Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 February 23

= February 23 =

03:50:59, 23 February 2019 review of submission by AutoProf
I am trying to find out why ARTICLE WAS REJECTED AND MARK CORRECTIONS. THANK YOU AutoProf (talk) 03:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Welcome to AfC help desk. I believe this is the article you mentioned above - User:AutoProf/sandbox. You submit the article for review only with article name and without any content. The reviewer marked "test edit/submission". Pls read WP:Your First Article and referecing on how to write an article and how to provide inline citation (sources). Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:24, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Request on 06:56:19, 23 February 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar (talk) 06:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Dan arndt As like the other companies i have created the article about Goldi Solar, there isn't any element that reflect towards any promotional activity. I have put simply company details in the article like Vikram Solar. if my article shows the promotional activity then what about Vikram Solar?


 * Both the Draft and your username are promotional. You will need to change your username and the Draft will be deleted. Don't waste your time promoting your company here. Legacypac (talk) 11:46, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

06:56:22, 23 February 2019 review of draft by Amitavanath12
Why my article "Singling at Sikim" which I have submitted for review on 22 February is not visible in Wikipedia search bar

Amitavanath12 (talk) 06:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Big backlog. It meets WP:GEOLAND and I have accepted it. It may take some time to show up in Google. Legacypac (talk) 11:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

08:18:20, 23 February 2019 review of submission by Singerkirankaur
Singerkirankaur (talk) 08:18, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Page rejected. See the notes on the page. Legacypac (talk) 11:32, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

11:08:47, 23 February 2019 review of submission by Amitavanath12
As I saw my submitted article "How bird is identified" has been renamed as"Bird Identification", is there any thing for me to do now? Amitavanath12 (talk) 11:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The page was rejected because it is not in the form of a wikipedia article but in the form of a how to guide. Legacypac (talk) 11:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

12:39:23, 23 February 2019 review of submission by Talktrue17co9
FIRST TELL US WHY YOU ARE REQUESTING A RE-REVIEW ON THE LINE BELOW THIS LINE. Take as many lines as you need. -->}} I am requesting for this review to show that the edit is authentic and true. thanks. Talktrue17co9 (talk) 12:39, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . True is a good thing for a draft to be, but information is not included in the encyclopedia just because it is true. To be included in Wikipedia, the subject must be notable. To demonstrate notability, the draft would need to cite independent, reliable, secondary sources. It cites no independent sources, only ones where the content has been written by YSJ. See WikiProject Albums/Sources for where to get information about a musician. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

17:02:11, 23 February 2019 review of submission by Eusebius28
I have added numerous reliable sources, based on various articles on academics / academic institutions which are on Wikipedia I believe these should be sufficient.

Eusebius28 (talk) 17:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

20:06:50, 23 February 2019 review of submission by Olivia browny
Olivia browny (talk) 20:06, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * As you have been notified, "This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia". Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Soundcloud are NOT reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Another example why we need to take the Ask for Advice button off the Reject. Legacypac (talk) 20:39, 23 February 2019 (UTC)