Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 February 28

= February 28 =

13:11:01, 28 February 2019 review of draft by BING DA DA DING DIG DNG DUNG DING
What more does this need? It's more noteworthy than dozens of galleries that have their own page - the Jack The Ripper museum two streets down, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_the_Ripper_Museum BING DA DA DING DIG DNG DUNG DING (talk) 13:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * , I notice it was just established last month, so thee may not be many sources yet. The two sources you did list do not really count as reliable sources for the purpose of notability--reviews in appropriate art magazines or major newspapers would do  it.  DGG ( talk ) 19:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * for the reasons explained on the draft (basically the same thing DGG, Theroadislong, and Bkissin said). --Worldbruce (talk) 19:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

13:49:38, 28 February 2019 review of submission by OlaniyiMoses2008
{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Please, I need to resubmit an article Draft:InterswitchSPAK after disapproved 2 times. But I could not find the submit button again. I have improved on notability of the article. Please, tell me what I must do submit again.

Best Regards.

Thank you

OlaniyiMoses2008 (talk) 13:49, 28 February 2019 (UTC) {{SAFESUBST:Void|

14:10:36, 28 February 2019 review of submission by Diggerty
I came across this draft article that had been rejected a few weeks ago and think that it is excellent and feel that a lot of people in the UK will learn something from it (as I have) and I feel it is unfair that it has been censured by somebody who is obviously living in the USA and has no knowledge or interest in the subject and is now stopping people from reading it. He has not even made constructive comments on how it can be improved to make it acceptable to him. I worked very hard on this revision, editing it into a neutral article and making it easier to read. In my opinion having studied many published Wikipedia pages on this subject and many others it does not offer any more unsubstantiated views than many others do. Also all the so called 'views' mentioned are merely interpretations of the facts that have been established by the authorities cited and as such ARE substantiated. Wikipedia states that the rules are not supposed to be 'made in stone' but in my mind rules are being unfairly bent in this instance in rejecting this article in this fashion. I know a lot of people who would want to have the opportunity to read this article and it should be freely available for them to do so on Wikipedia which is supposed to be for everybody and this article very much has a place on it. Diggerty (talk) 14:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * As the "somebody who is obviously living in the USA" I would like to respond to Diggerty. The draft in question purports to be about a movement within the UK to achieve Brexit on certain terms. As a draft about an organization, one would expect it to define the organization: its founding, its history, its leadership and membership, and its achievements. However, the draft in question is an expression of the group's manifesto with none of that other material that one would expect in an article about the organization. I rejected the draft on those terms (as a violation of neutrality). Others are free to re-review the work and see if their mileage varies. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:14, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

14:37:10, 28 February 2019 review of submission by Arzumio
Arzumio (talk) 14:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

I didn't put any sources because me and Lil Chang himself made this because there is nothing talking about him.
 * If there's "nothing talking about him" then we won't either. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

18:18:57, 28 February 2019 review of submission by 89.216.104.134
Hi! This article is not at all about the football player. This is about totally different Stefan Marinković, a legendary release manager, ie. software engineer responsible for new code releases in many major companies in Italy, Serbia and Malta. Stefari is so famous and well known that many fun clubs (closed membership though, private clubs) dedicated to praise his work exist. Stefari is so huge.

89.216.104.134 (talk) 18:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * , are there publicly avail sources for him,  substantial 3rd party independent published reliable sources?  If all the information is private, it may not be possible to make an article.  DGG ( talk ) 19:25, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

18:38:19, 28 February 2019 review of draft by Theprophetdavid
where can i put a link to the website as a reference?

Theprophetdavid (talk) 18:38, 28 February 2019 (UTC)