Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 February 5

= February 5 =

00:22:29, 5 February 2019 review of draft by Mccreacr78
I am trying to write a page for an academic researcher that I admire. She works in social work and researches relationships and co-parenting in divorce. First i included her works to support her noteworthiness as an academic author. Then feedback said that I needed more third party support her notability. So I removed some of her works and then included references by other authors- then the feedback said that it read more like an advertisement. Can you let me know what to do so that I can get a page made that represents her? Mccreacr78 (talk) 00:22, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

01:33:31, 5 February 2019 review of submission by Nicoledomingo.newscorp
Nicoledomingo.newscorp (talk) 01:33, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

04:07:08, 5 February 2019 review of submission by Cb912
Hello! I'm requesting a re-review because I feel that the subject meets the requirements for WP:COMPOSER, specifically point # 2, for work on "All The Kids Are Doing It", and #1 for writing the music and lyrics to the albums "Love Me Love Me Not", and "Young Kind of Love". In addition, subject is frequently covered in Playbill Magazine and BroadwayWorld, two of the most prominent news outlets for the musical theatre industry, which I feel would qualify for point #1 under 'Other'.

Regarding reliable sources, the subject is frequently covered in Playbill & BroadwayWorld, as well as notable LGBT news outlets, The Advocate & Out Magazine. The coverage is not passing mentions, but rather articles directly related to work that Mr. Contreras has developed or is working on. Any other thoughts or advice is appreciated! Thank you for your help!

Cb912 (talk) 04:07, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I think there is a good case for notability. Legacypac (talk) 08:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

06:19:59, 5 February 2019 review of submission by WayneBu
I drafted the article in my own space. The button to submit for approval was always there and when I was ready I pressed it. I got this message back "Resubmit when you're set, There's tag showing this is a work-in-progress page." Where is this tag? How do I change it?

Thanks

WayneBu (talk) 06:19, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, Welcoem to AfC help desk.I have moved your article to Draft:LEGO WeDo. At the top of the draft article there is a pink panel, at the very bottom of the pink panel there is the "Resubmit" button. Click the button and it will forward the draft article to the pool for reviewing. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:52, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, many thanks for your help. Cheers, WayneBu (talk) 07:03, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, I am not sure you request your draft article to be deleted as I could not find the edit you made on this. However, I am here to inform you that your draft page has been deleted under G7 - see HERE. If you would like to continue to edit or you did not make this request, pls click "Refund" and follow the instructions accordingly.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:17, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

08:07:15, 5 February 2019 review of submission by 49.130.130.78
Dear Editor,

So what should I do if I really wanted to create the topic of O’Darien Bassett, as we notice that this person who is professional basketball living and existing, and those information I found to describe him were corrected and by trusted  significance media reports. Why could this application still consider as rejected? Please just tell me, what else do I need to do right now?

Many thanks!

Regards, Tszyeung1988

49.130.130.78 (talk) 08:07, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Refently found not to pass our notability guidelines for basketball players. See comment on Draft Legacypac (talk) 08:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

09:17:45, 5 February 2019 review of submission by Xadji
{{SAFESUBST:Void| The history of nukus state teachers’ training institute refer s to the year of 1934. First in Turtkul, the former capital of Karakalpakstan there was founded a higher educational institution directed to train teaching personnel for the public education system. Lots of the local authorities, distinguished education workers, workers of the national economy, culture and science used to study at different periods of time at Nukus State Teachers’ Training Institute. Its graduates live today in different regions of Uzbekistan, in neighboring Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and in other republics of Central Asia and of the whole post-Soviet area having made a big contribution in the matter of upbringing the younger generation of their society. The Institute is very proud of its honored graduates – 6 academicians    and  5 Heroes of Uzbekistan. After the foundation the Institute passed several stages of development. Firstly it existed as the Teacher’s Institute and then it was renamed into Karakalpak State Teacher-Training Institute. The organization kept functioning in this status till the middle of the 70-es when in 1976 KSTTI was reestablished into Nukus State University, and later – into Karakalpak State Berdakh University. In 1991, after the declaration of Uzbek Independence there begins to develop intensively a new approach to training of the teaching personnel and improvement of the quality of education ( the Law on Education and the National Program on Personnel Training) in Uzbekistan. As a result, at that very time in Nukus, the capital of the Republic of Karakalpakstan there was established on the base of the university Nukus State Teacher-Training Institute which in 1992 was named after Ajiniyaz – the distinguished philosopher of the Aral  Coast Area of  the middle of the Х I Х -th century and one of the classics of the Karakalpak poetry. The educational process in Nukus State Ajiniyaz Teachers’ Training Institute is based on a multi-level system. 9 faculties of the Institute are involved in training of the highly qualified teaching personnel in 19 fields of baccalaureate and in 13 specializations of master’s degree. There is also the special correspondence department in the institute. A big attention in the Institute is paid to research work. The scholars of the Institute are engaged in research work in the field of history, archeology and ethnic culture of the Karakalpak people, its folklore and literary heritage. Besides, they study the reason of the Aral Sea disaster and develop scientific methods directed to improve the ecological situation in the region and to preserve its flora and fauna. The Institute has all necessary conditions to train new generation of teaching personnel: – the qualified professorial-teaching staff consisting of 1 academician; 17 doctors and professors, 107 candidates and docents. They are known as the state grant recipients, distinguished scholars and public education system workers, laureates of state awards and professionals awarded with medals for achievements  in the sphere of education; – material-technical base meeting the requirements of the up-to-date higher school; scientific and academic laboratories, Internet rooms, lingua-phone rooms, multi-media equipment, information-resource center, regularly renewed library fund, sport complexes, well-equipped canteens and student’s dormitory. The students of Nukus State Teachers’ Training Institute are the winners of the republican Olympiads in the Karakalpak, Kazakh language s and literature, they are the finalists of the Presidential and the tate Ulugbek and Navoi Stipend Programs  as well as of the International Mendeleev Stipend Program and the State Scholarship Program    « Kelajak Ovozi »; the finalists of the students’ intellectual contests, the champions of “Universiad” and of  other republican sports tournaments in volleyball and football. The women’s volleyball team of Nukus State Teachers’ Training Institute participates in the final league of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The students’ amateur choreographic group of the Institute “Tumaris” every year takes part in the activities connected with the all-republican holidays of Navruz and Independence Day held in the capitals of our republics, the cities of Nukus  and Tashkent Xadji (talk) 09:17, 5 February 2019 (UTC) {{collapsebottom}}

09:51:10, 5 February 2019 review of submission by Priyajain5553
Priyajain5553 (talk) 09:51, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

11:01:57, 5 February 2019 review of submission by Siouxchief
Hi, just wanted to reach out to see what I needed to do to get this article live? Some of these websites like Belfast Telegraph which I added today who referenced us are big newspapers here in Northern Ireland. Let me know what you need or if this is enough now?

Thanks

Siouxchief (talk) 11:01, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Greetings. the source you provided only provide passing mentioned of the subject instead of talks about the subject in length and in dept. Pls read the notability and type of sources requirements here - Notability (organizations and companies). Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:11, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

12:10:35, 5 February 2019 review of draft by Joefhall
Joefhall (talk) 12:10, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

12:11:42, 5 February 2019 review of draft by Joefhall
Hello, I feel the reasons given for declining the draft of the page I created are a little unfair.

It isn't a one-off event: it was a two-year inquiry. Other inquiries e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grenfell_Tower_Inquiry are included on Wikipedia.

I take the point that some people might not think this is news. However, it was featured in national news articles in the Times and the Guardian. And it was covered a number of times in charity/NGO sector news outlets -- this sector is the real audience for it, and I would think it's valid to include something that's of real interest to a particular audience (and would think that quite a few Wikipedia articles would be similar?)

I appreciate the article could be better written -- it's my first time writing on Wikipedia so I'm a newbie. If you have any tips of things I could do to make this more publishable that would be much appreciated. Thank you.

Joefhall (talk) 12:11, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

12:32:46, 5 February 2019 review of submission by BONGINKOSI
Moloi 12:32, 5 February 2019 (UTC) Why Every Time I Post My Are Articles Are Dclined??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BONGINKOSI (talk • contribs) 12:32, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Because you're writing about yourself. This isn't Facebook. Cabayi (talk) 18:36, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

14:00:00, 5 February 2019 review of draft by DondeEstaElBurro?
DondeEstaElBurro? (talk) 14:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Are there any other submissions about the 2019 Paris apartment fire competing with mine?
 * Topic was rightly declined and I have declined it again. See reasons on draft. Not a viable topic. Legacypac (talk) 23:11, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

16:00:47, 5 February 2019 review of submission by Leahernandez1
I am requesting a re-review, because I am a new contributor for this person. I am not sure why it was she was rejected the first time, but she is someone who is trying to make a name for herself and she is trying to create an Instagram around her brand, but for that to happen, she needs a Wikipedia page. So it is important for her to have a Wikipedia page that helps improve her brand. This page will really help her with building her career and create opportunities for her to go a long way. She is inspired by the contributions of this site that has helped others with building or keeping their brand alive. Being on this page is not just a goal, but a dream. Leahernandez1 (talk) 16:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * presumably you are referring to Draft:Sarajuana? From what you have written above I think you are not understanding the purpose of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a repository of accepted known information about notable topics, it is not for building careers or developing a brand.  If, and only when, Sarajuana becomes known and there is information in reliable, verifiable and independent sources then she may have the notability to warrant an article.  In a nutshell once she gets written about then she gets a Wikipedia article but you don't use Wikipedia for garnering the reputation in the first place.  Please read the links that were put on your talk page that discuss these issues in greater depth. Nthep (talk) 17:03, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * What you are saying is that you are trying to create an article about a person in order to promote her. Wikipedia policy does not permit such promotional editing. That is not the reason which was given by the reviewer for rejecting the draft, but it is another good reason why it is not suitable. Also, the reviewer who declined your submission gave the reason as "This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia", and that reason included a link to Wikipedia's notability guideline, which yo can read if you wish to understand better why the draft was rejected. If you wish to help to make a person who is not yet well-known better known then good luck in trying to do so, but that is not what Wikipedia is for, so you will need to do it somewhere else. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:04, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

16:20:56, 5 February 2019 review of submission by SteveGraham0
SteveGraham0 (talk) 16:20, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

17:23:19, 5 February 2019 review of draft by Yovraj123
Yovraj123 17:23, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


 * - there aren't any actual sources in this draft, as the reference just says "Bihar legislative Assembly". Articles need good, reliable, sourcing Nosebagbear (talk) 16:15, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

22:46:13, 5 February 2019 review of submission by 日・本
日・本 (talk) 22:46, 5 February 2019 (UTC) Draft:Breakfast in Japan is my pagename.

(I accidentaly sent this do my reviewer, should have put it here. :P)

Hi,

I'm a bit confused why you turned down my article. You noted that said articles only have a passing mention of my page Draft:Breakfast in Japan, but the external articles I chose are specifically about breakfasts in Japan. Can you please help with that?

Also, you seem to have noted that the webpages in citing must be independent from the subject. That makes sense if it is a business or such, but no one can actually own a breakfast style, so I can't help that.

Thanks,

--日・本 (talk) 22:46, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . Quora is user generated content, so it is not a reliable source. Serious Eats is a blog. Blogs usually aren't reliable sources. You might be able to argue that the founder is a subject matter expert, but even then caution should be exercised with such sources. The topic is already covered (and covered better) in Breakfast. That article section cites a book from an academic publisher, a much better source than the draft's. WikiProject Food and drink/Tools/sources lists other good sources to use when writing about food. If you want to write about the topic, start by improving the section in Breakfast. Don't create a separate article unless the section grows beyond 500-600 words (2-3 times its present length). --Worldbruce (talk) 23:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC)