Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 February 9

= February 9 =

00:42:57, 9 February 2019 review of submission by IWAAD NATION
I would like to re-edit and resubmit....is this possible....?

IWAAD NATION (talk) 00:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . The topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing will get an article on the subject accepted. This is an encyclopedia, not a place to write about yourself or to advertise, promote, or "get the word out" about anything. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

01:09:54, 9 February 2019 review of draft by Hawaiiaces
What additional information is needed to have this article published? How do we know which statements need inline citiations?

Hawaiiaces (talk) 01:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Sources. See WP:V. Unsourced BLPs will be deleted. ― Abelmoschus Esculentus  ( talk •  contribs ) 01:24, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

01:31:55, 9 February 2019 review of submission by Lurain11
Please explain clearly what is needed to get the page published. I have a few more edits to make and would like to submit. But before I do so, I want to make sure the page will meet Wikipedia publishing criteria.

Also previously, I receive a message from Worldbruce asking about conflict of interest. Please know that I have no external relationship with the organization.

Thanks. Lurain11 (talk) 01:31, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Please read Your first article. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:17, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

02:23:00, 9 February 2019 review of submission by Garyrich
Garyrich (talk) 02:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Why is my article about heat exchangers for diesel fuel rejected
 * It is not an article just a question. Legacypac (talk) 04:25, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

04:22:32, 9 February 2019 review of submission by Handigan
What can I fix to get this article published? This is my first article and I am new to the process. Handigan (talk) 04:22, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:AUTOBIO, WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BLP. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

12:16:08, 9 February 2019 review of submission by E-Stylus
Thank you for reviewing the above draft. I'm responsible for 1 of the 4 draft submissions and added my COI disclosure to the talk page before editing. Per the stop sign icon, I'm requesting a re-review of the references in relation to WP:NCORP guidelines. Specifically, please see The Robot Report, Robotics Business Review, [https://6river.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Goods-to-Person-Robotics-by-Styleintelligence-February-2018-v1.3.pdf. Styleintelligence Report] and Technology and the Virtues. These articles, report and book seem to have significant coverage of the subject and appear to "include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject". If these references establish notability, there is also coverage of the subject in multiple RS to verify some of the article's content. Please see The Boston Globe, Boston Business Journal, MIT, Bridgewater State University Undergraduate Review, WBUR, Washington Post, The New York Times and NASA Spinoff. Any feedback you can offer would be appreciated. Thanks. E-Stylus (talk) 12:16, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm going to accept it. A lot if RS coverage. Legacypac (talk) 02:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you . E-Stylus (talk) 03:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

15:01:49, 9 February 2019 review of draft by RonanODriscoll
Hi, I am trying to get a page reviewed and it was initially rejected. Now there is no more input after my improving the page. Can I appeal the decision to have it left in draft as the initial editor is no longer interested?

Here is the page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tralibane RonanODriscoll (talk) 15:01, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . Tralibane was moved from mainspace to draft (here the term "rejected" is used for something else). Now it's in the pool to be reviewed, which you can expect to happen within the next two months. You may continue improving it while you wait. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi . Thanks for responding. Is there any way to know how much more editing is needed? I would hate to wait 2 months to have it rejected again (call it what you will, it was still rejected) and be left wondering what the reasons were.
 * Articles for creation is an iterative process. It's unfortunate that the backlog is as large as it is, but don't let that discourage you. Contrast the draft with Banagher and Lurgan. The draft need not be as long as them to be accepted, but those examples may give you ideas about the range of sources to look for and what else you might be able to write a paragraph about. Consider asking for advice at the talk page for WikiProject Ireland. That project is also a good place to find existing articles to improve while you wait for the draft to be reviewed. See Community portal for more ways to help. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

16:42:32, 9 February 2019 review of submission by Appushere
Hi Dan, As per your suggestion, I have removed the youtube and wikipedia links as citation. I have included more reliable citations and references. Request a re-review. I sincerely hope the article will be published. If there are any more corrections to be made, please let me know. Thank you.

Appushere (talk) 16:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC) Appushere (talk) 16:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

18:26:47, 9 February 2019 review of submission by M416p
hello sir! this article is available on other languages as well, so i think it confirms the natability. M416p (talk) 18:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

19:17:11, 9 February 2019 review of submission by RobertGerrard
ROBERTGERRARD 19:17, 9 February 2019 (UTC)