Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 January 19

= January 19 =

02:45:06, 19 January 2019 review of draft by Bablu Baghel
Bablu Baghel 02:45, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

05:30:24, 19 January 2019 review of submission by Esports.achiever
if we could know the actual reason for our article to be rejected? for your information the article is about Mr India Pritam Chougule and information given is genuine as far as our concern. it can be verified as necessary using the contact details of Mr Pritam chougule given. Thank you Esports.achiever (talk) 05:30, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . Draft User:Esports.achiever/sandbox was rejected because the subject is not notable (does not satisfy the inclusion criteria for Wikipedia). --Worldbruce (talk) 06:10, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

06:10:02, 19 January 2019 review of submission by 2001:14BB:82:6985:9052:FF3:3ADA:593E
As per the Musician criteria I’ve further added - entries on National charts (three previous albums), one reaches #6 on Physical album chart. - three nominations for Jazz Album of the Year by International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (Finland) - two nationally live broadcasted feature concert under his own name: Finnish National Boradcasting Company YLE and Westdeutscher Rundfunk WDR (Cologne, Germany).

2001:14BB:82:6985:9052:FF3:3ADA:593E (talk) 06:10, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I have resubmitted the draft on the strength of the 3 albums charting on the Finnish national chart. It will be reviewed in due course. You can continue to improve it while you wait. For example, external links, links that take the reader away from Wikipedia, are not allowed in the text. There are three in the draft; they should be removed. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:26, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

20:31:58, 19 January 2019 review of submission by 76.89.243.88
The re-edit now includes references and citations.

76.89.243.88 (talk) 20:31, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The piece in The Victoria Advocate is a start, although some reviewers will discount it as an interview in Kelton's small hometown newspaper. All of the other sources are trivial mentions, which do more harm to the draft than good. Replace those five with two sources as deep as, at least as reliable as, and more arms length than The Victoria Advocate, and the draft might have a chance. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

20:57:59, 19 January 2019 review of submission by 49.15.234.239
49.15.234.239 (talk) 20:57, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

23:30:04, 19 January 2019 review of draft by Fraction7
I created a page for my movie, VIYCE. It was not biased or inaccurate. You stated that it was a joke or a hoax. It is not either. VIYCE is a real movie. I know because I made it. Please publish the article now. Thank you. Fraction7 (talk) 23:30, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . Don't create articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization, or products. Wikipedia is not the place to get the word out about anything. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:08, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh. So you'll write an article about my movie, then? Who's going to? Fraction7 (talk) 21:10, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * No, I don't create articles about films. Hundreds of volunteers do, though, and any number of them would write a Wikipedia article about your movie (although not necessarily to your schedule), if it were notable, in other words, if the world at large had already taken significant notice of it. Simply existing is not a reason to have an encyclopedia article about it. From what you've written elsewhere, I gather that there are no independent, reliable, secondary sources about it. That means it isn't notable (doesn't satisfy the encyclopedia's inclusion criteria). So there's no point in anyone writing an article about it here, because Wikipedia would not publish it.
 * There are talk page guidelines that you should attempt to follow. In particular:
 * As a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving a draft in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic, or statements based on your thoughts, feelings, or beliefs.
 * Fragmenting discussion by posting the same or similar questions in multiple locations is an unhelpful behavior known as forum shopping.
 * When you have a conflict of interest with regard to a topic, you are expected to respect the volunteer community's time and avoid making protracted or repeated requests.
 * Repeated violations of these behavioral norms may lead to being blocked from editing. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:38, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

23:41:20, 19 January 2019 review of submission by MarFad92
MarFad92 (talk) 23:41, 19 January 2019 (UTC) It was an accident. I slipped and my keyboard decided to make random sayings. Also perhaps my mouse as well.