Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 July 1

= July 1 =

Request on 05:02:54, 1 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Nilomimehta
Nilomimehta (talk) 05:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Please find that we have not used any copyrighted material illegally or unethically. The website IAGD has granted us rights to use the information published on their page. Please help us get this article published.
 * Who is "we"? Wikipedia accounts cannot be shared by multiple people. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 07:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

08:50:14, 1 July 2019 review of submission by 77.247.249.172
77.247.249.172 (talk) 08:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 09:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

10:49:09, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Gopal jha bjp
Gopal jha bjp (talk) 10:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Request on 12:13:59, 1 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by 65.242.187.146
Thanks for the note. I’m sorry the page came across as promotional. We modeled it after the UCaaS wiki page. Can you be more specific regarding what was promotional about it? We’re more than happy to add/delete/edit with your guidance. Thank you.

65.242.187.146 (talk) 12:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * who is "we"? If you are getting paid to edit Wikipedia, you must disclose it. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 15:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

13:18:31, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Mohammadk97
The reason for the rejection, which was "not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia", was not very clear. I don't see any reason for it not being accepted, even after reviewing all the rules of submission. The person of the titled article is well known in the automobiles business in Lebanon, and is looked upon by so many people interested in the industry. I've edited the intro and added his Guinness Word Record breaking.

Mohammadk97 (talk) 13:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * we do not consider Guinness as evidence for notability, especially when its for as minor and specialized a matter as here.There are just not sufficient accomplishements, which accounts for the lack of references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources  DGG ( talk ) 09:33, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

15:16:06, 1 July 2019 review of submission by HillsOne
HillsOne (talk) 15:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

15:29:09, 1 July 2019 review of draft by 2600:1700:93B0:1350:30AC:F6D2:572C:63BC
So there was going to be a announcement during September and we have to wait.

2600:1700:93B0:1350:30AC:F6D2:572C:63BC (talk) 15:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

15:38:03, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Farhinvohra07
I am sking for re-review because i have written this content by myself. And for the person i am writing is famous person he is a creator of 07 team a famous tiktok team which has million of followers in India as well as worldwide.

If there is any mistake in content or title is not suitable please advice me I will change the content and title. Farhinvohra07 (talk) 15:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

16:01:42, 1 July 2019 review of submission by O'Hagan22
Hi, This is my first time publishing a page so I have a lot to learn, my recent attempt to publish the above page was declined and I am unsure what I should do in order to move forward. My recent note was 'references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage' The page I'm trying to create is information on a novel which has been published in several countries and languages, has been reviewed by a number of notable newspapers and magazines, NY Times, Guardian, Telegraph and so on and It was published by a well known and reputable publishers Faber & Faber and is sold in most high street book stores. The author in question has a number of novels some of which are on schools curriculums. Having looked at other contemporary authors and their novels pages I can't see any notable difference in my content. Could you please advise? Thank you :)

O&#39;Hagan22 (talk) 16:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

16:49:52, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Vishnubharathan002
vishnu bharathan is a notable person in malayalam short films, his works are famous beacuse of its humour. it was widley got critical and audience appreciation, so here request you to please re think about this decison Vishnubharathan002 (talk) 16:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

19:01:45, 1 July 2019 review of draft by Pi314m
It could very well be that the publication itself (HRO Today) is not notable, in which case I can easily understand that it has no place in Wikipedia, _BUT_
 * the awards they put out, (Baker's dozen, Top RPO (Recruitment process outsourcing) Provider, and other CapitaLized AcroNyms), get attention.


 * HRO Today is cited both in Wiki articles and in NYTimes articles that follow awardees of HRO Today's awards
 * Question: Should the article be flipped- named something like HRO Today award series and then just have a minor section about the magazine, which still does seem notable for-
 * an article titled "Insourcing, Outsourcing? How about Self-sourcing?" that


 * mined Wikipedia's history of a pair of banks that merged decades ago as Standard Chartered and, after September 11, rebuilt its personnel department in an innovative way.
 * as for a pair of words, "selfsourcing" or "self-sourcing" : I have no source that they were first, so I wrote that the article was an "early user of."

To repeat and summarize: Am I better off "flipping" the orientation to awards - since that's what gets attention? Pi314m (talk) 19:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Pi314m (talk) 19:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

22:36:52, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Beth A. Farrell
Beth A. Farrell (talk) 22:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Page Name: Beth Farrell

User Name: Beth A. Farrell

Hi! I was notified that my submission was declined because it appeared to be a "test article". I don't understand what that means. I'm trying to submit my information/article as a legitimate, recognized and published artist. Any advice on how I can do that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, Beth Farrell
 * Beth A. Farrell I wouldn't of denied it as a test edit. However I do see two problems here. First off it seems to be a autobiography which are strongly discouraged here on Wikipedia. Secondly you only have a link to your personal website for a reference which is a primary source. Wikipedia requires several secondary sources for inclusion on Wikipedia.  Whispering ( t ) 22:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)