Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 July 13

= July 13 =

03:59:07, 13 July 2019 review of submission by Philippineshd
Philippineshd (talk) 03:59, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

04:51:32, 13 July 2019 review of submission by Andrew nyr
This article fixed the mistakes and is ready for re review. Andrew nyr (talk) 04:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

07:57:50, 13 July 2019 review of draft by Falconite007
Hello, I submitted my draft again after some revisions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Supernode_Proof_of_Stake It's been pending for about a month now. I'm just a bit confused since the last few times the reviews took about a week's time. Hope I did not make any mistake while submitting.

Falconite007 (talk) 07:57, 13 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi . The draft is in the pool to be reviewed. The current backlog is 16 weeks. Reviewers are volunteers and are not required to go through drafts in any particular order. Some fish among the newest, perhaps looking for ones that can be quickly failed or accepted. That may explain why your earlier versions were disposed of quickly. Check back near the end of October. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:10, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

09:41:49, 13 July 2019 review of submission by Resource2222
I have received a message about making changes to a page on Kalyn Ponga and a page on Article Creation. I did not make either of these edits. Resource2222 (talk) 09:41, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

15:47:43, 13 July 2019 review of submission by Daniel Unubi Ezekiel
Daniel Unubi Ezekiel (talk) 15:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Request on 18:41:11, 13 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Mizumakipswada
Trying to get an article published, added in quotes and properly cited the sources but no word on whether or not the page has been published as of yet.

Mizumakipswada (talk) 18:41, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
 * You have not submitted it for review yet, but before you do you will need to find a number of independent reliable sources, your draft Draft:Jean-Marie Haessle has none so far.

23:10:58, 13 July 2019 review of draft by GipsyG
GipsyG (talk) 23:10, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

hi. why so long to review this edition of the draft? thx.


 * Hi . The draft has been in the pool to be reviewed for 7 weeks. The current backlog is 16 weeks. Reviewers are volunteers and are not required to go through drafts in any particular order. Some fish among the newest, perhaps looking for ones that can be quickly failed or accepted. That may explain why your first version was declined on the day it was submitted. Work on something else while you wait (Community portal lists ways to help) and try to find solace in the fact that there is no deadline. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:58, 14 July 2019 (UTC)