Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 July 3

= July 3 =

01:36:06, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Arman-BCSEA
I am seeing that the page is rejected due to being "not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia." BCSEA has been cited on the Climate change mitigation page where a dedicated article is missing and BCSEA is also mentioned in the History of green policies in Vancouver. I am confused about the decision. A dedicated article can help complete the two pages. Also, organizations of the same type that we have worked with frequently in the past like the Sierra Club Canada have a page. Can you please Re-Review or let me know if there is anything I can do about this decision?

(disclaimer as my account says: I am a volunteer for the organization). Arman-BCSEA (talk) 01:36, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

02:49:59, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Gipsyblues
Gipsyblues (talk) 02:49, 3 July 2019 (UTC) Draft writer/editor: Gipsyblues Draft: DVEO This question or request is for advice is for a page I am writing for DVEO which was rejected by DGG on June 9, 2019,as looking more like an ad than a wikipedia article Unfortunately that remark is NOT helpful because there is no definition about the ad characteristics which the draft has which makes it look more like a commercial.

I hope that experienced editors will help newer editors by not only describing an article is looking like a commercial but explain why an article looks like a commercial.

I am writing about a DVEO - a company which has contributed to the success of NASA's efforts to educate the general public as to what is happening in the Space program by supplying a key component to the video production section of the airborne equipment to help NASA send very high quality video streams from Space to the NASA facility on earth to re broadcast those images and activities to the general public on earth.

I have since then done a number of re edits. In the History of company section, I have re-written the first part as prose as opposed to using a bullet format to explain activities in specified dates. I have intentionally left the second half of the History using the bulleted date format. Please comments will be very helpful

I had a section for key products which I have deleted completely and retained at the end of the draft, a list of awards DVEO has received. I could use some help in that section too

I would also welcome other advice and how to organize this draft to make it look or meet the conditions of a wikipedia article

Sincerely

Gipsyblues

04:56:53, 3 July 2019 review of draft by GouravSWS
May I know is there any changes required in this page and I want to know how much time it takes for verification. I am waiting for your response.. Thanks in Advance GouravSWS (talk) 04:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * the review backlog is currently about 3 to 4 months. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 06:36, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Request on 06:39:34, 3 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Craig-SG-Wright
Hello. I have had an article about a product called Paligo rejected. I have been given the codes for the reasons why, but I am unsure what parts I need to change or remove in order to get the article accepted. Is it possible to get more detailed information on what parts are deemed unacceptable?

Thanks Craig-SG-Wright (talk) 06:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)


 * There is an almost total absence of references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. Yhe only substanial refernces is a interview where the head of the firmjust says   whatever they want to . This is PR, not an trully independent source.  If the product is truly important, there should be better sources.  DGG ( talk ) 09:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

09:05:13, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Jordi Scott
for page of Jeffrey Feinman, the list of external links was edited.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jeffrey_Feinman

pls review and advise if it is acceptable.

thx Jordi Scott (talk) 09:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Hopelessly promotional article on a homeopathic veterinarian, described epeatedly in hearticle as "Dr. Jeff.", just asit would be in his advertising. If he isnotable, which I doubt, atotal rewrite would be needed by a editor with a neutral point of view.  DGG ( talk ) 09:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

09:37:09, 3 July 2019 review of submission by 95.185.199.156
95.185.199.156 (talk) 09:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * This draft was approved and has been moved to mainspace. If you created it, Congratulations! Jannik Schwaß (talk) 05:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

11:23:31, 3 July 2019 review of submission by S4satishverma
S4satishverma (talk) 11:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

14:28:00, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Kbradley26
Please provide me with assistance and what I can do to get my submission approved. What do I need to change and do differently?

Kbradley26 (talk) 14:28, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

16:29:32, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Rgb326
As you can tell from my article. Rory Diamond is very notable for his work as CEO of K9s for Warriors (the nations largest service dog provider for veterans who suffer from PTSD). Rory is also a city councilman for Jacksonville and serves as the vice chairman for the rules committee. Rory has appeared on many news stations including Fox News, CSPAN, and Washington Post. Rory Diamond also received a distinguished service award in 2001 from President George Bush for his work in the White house during 9/11. As you can can tell, Rory is a very notable person. If you need any more information please feel free to reach out. Thank you for your reconsideration. Rgb326 (talk) 16:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

16:42:50, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Sarahmpalmer.0
This is my first time posting to Wiki. I did not intend to advertise my topic but recieved a rejection based on that. Was there something specific that was unacceptable about my post? I understand that my links need to be from other sources other than the creator of my topic.... is that correct? Sarahmpalmer.0 (talk) 16:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC) Sarahmpalmer.0 (talk) 16:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

19:03:31, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Texacomexico
Texacomexico (talk) 19:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)