Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 June 27

= June 27 =

00:33:23, 27 June 2019 review of submission by 148.75.165.78
Found and referenced additional significant coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject

148.75.165.78 (talk) 00:33, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * - hi there, as this was, it should have been declined, not by rejected by your reviewer.


 * In any case, I've reviewed it again and passed it - very impressive to find reviews that good for a film over a century old! Nosebagbear (talk) 08:10, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

01:55:14, 27 June 2019 review of draft by Joshua at mixi Inc
Hi there! I requested the creation of a COI article to be made in my stead, but it was declined because there were insufficient reliable sources, and also for the reason that it read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia.

We are now attempting another request on the Japanese Wikipedia, hoping that we can provide more reliable sources in Japanese. However, we are unsure if the addition of links to the app's awards will help increase the number or reliable resources, or instead make it read more like an advertisement. I would be very grateful if you could give me your opinion as an experienced editor!

Thank you very much for your time, and I look forward to your reply. Joshua @ mixi

Joshua at mixi Inc (talk) 01:55, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi if you can find good sources in Japanese, or any other language, you can cite them here too. The English Wikipedia accepts sources in any language. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

12:20:21, 27 June 2019 review of submission by PilotSuggs
The article has been updated to reflect the recent extreme adventure that Paul Suggitt has completed, a first on the actual route he took. It also draws note on the firsts he has completed over the last few years that are documented in the media. Any help / tweaks to get this published will be so gratefully received.

PilotSuggs (talk) 12:20, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, the draft currently relies almost entirely on local sources. If you can reference good sources from outside the Hartlepool area it might improve the chance of acceptance. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

15:23:35, 27 June 2019 review of draft by 2600:1700:93B0:1350:B5F7:9119:E9C9:92FB
so a poster surfaced on the web and it could mean that Ash will be in Galar and will travel with Gloria but there was no confirmation from ShoPro or TV Tokyo.

2600:1700:93B0:1350:B5F7:9119:E9C9:92FB (talk) 15:23, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

15:27:59, 27 June 2019 review of draft by PamMusic
Thank you for the initial review. The reviewer's comment was to add headings. Is this all I need to do? Is there also a problem with essay vs encyclopedic tone, as described in the introductory text?

I realize I still have some more work to do, including an external link to the ensemble's website and adding links for text items that refer to entities with their own Wikipedia articles.

PamMusic (talk) 15:27, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

15:34:14, 27 June 2019 review of draft by Coffeeandsmoke
Hi! I recently submitted an article for re-review Draft:Queens Night Market. I'd love to add some pictures, assuming the article is reviewed and ultimately accepted. Should I wait until a decision is made in order to upload pictures? Also, since I have a COI, are there special guidelines I should follow with respect to which images I submit for the article? I suppose the pictures should also somehow be neutral in tone, but not sure how to accomplish that as easily with pictures. Would love to get your advice. Thanks! Coffeeandsmoke (talk) 15:34, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Coffeeandsmoke (talk) 15:34, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi . There's no rush, the presence or absence of pictures will have no effect on whether the draft is accepted. For an article of this length, a single image would be enough, and any more would be excessive with the current text. But you may upload more than you can display immediately, in the expectation that the article will eventually grow and be able to accommodate more images. Manual of Style/Images gives some pointers.


 * With respect to COI, let other editors choose which image to use from among those uploaded. There are many excellent photographers in New York who will donate images. So consider what you can contribute that would be unique. That might be historical photos, photos of non-public parts of the facility, or photos for which you had to make special arrangements (a view of the market from a private area of an adjacent building, for example). --Worldbruce (talk) 03:18, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

17:39:46, 27 June 2019 review of draft by WillRowActor
Hi, I received an email that an edit had occurred. I am unsure what the edit was or how it aleffexts my pqge? Will Rowlands 17:39, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * - if you click "view history" on your draft (move the dots on the left to select which versions you'd like to compare) you can see. The three edits made on the page since you last altered it are:


 * 1) Moving it from your sandbox to a draft 2) Adding a couple of tags 3) A different editor declining it from AfC - as Wikipedia can't self-cite. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:01, 27 June 2019 (UTC)