Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 June 28

= June 28 =

03:47:52, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Soundwavepulseblaster
I'm requesting a re-review because this rapper needs an article on Wikipedia. I hope I followed the terms this time as well.

Soundwavepulseblaster (talk) 03:47, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * - the reviewer was correct to decline, as the draft needs more sources. Please take a look at the musician notability list of criteria. Fragmentationous would need to meet at least one of those, usually criterion 1 (multiple sources). Currently the only source doesn't appear to be about him so doesn't count. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

04:22:52, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Farhinvohra07
Farhinvohra07 (talk) 04:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Why my article is rejected? Can you please help me out finding my answer?Farhinvohra07 (talk) 04:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Farhinvohra07 (talk) 04:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * As the big pink box at the top of Draft:Sajid Mirza 07 - Sensation TikTok Star says, the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). --Worldbruce (talk) 02:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

What if I change the topic of article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farhinvohra07 (talk • contribs) 04:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

09:08:39, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Guru1313
how do i submit the original draft, it appears am submitting a duplicate draft. Please i need some help. thanks

Guru1313 (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * - I've submitted the original draft found here to AfC for you. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:11, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

09:35:52, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Shantiwong
My review said my article was contrary to the purposes of Wikipedia. Some explanation of why this is would be helpful. Shantiwong (talk) 09:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * - it's not clear what the draft is intending to talk about. It links to a couple of pre-existing articles and has a few weblinks, so doesn't appear to attempt to be an article. If you want to add those links to those articles then you can go there to do so (if they're appropriate)


 * If there's something we're missing than please let me know on my talk page (see the "talk" button in my signature) Nosebagbear (talk) 12:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

10:01:28, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Kendoma
Hello guys I don’t know why that article was denied. All i wrote about that person is real. He is a new rocking teenager in uganda so there is no that much references about him so I request your help Kendoma (talk) 10:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * See the large pink box at the top of the draft. Wikipedia aims to cover people who are notable, who have attracted significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, as demonstrated by significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources. A second reason the draft was declined is that it makes statements that cite no source(s). If there is "no that much references about him", then he is not a suitable topic for an encyclopedia article. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:38, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

10:41:33, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Kendoma
Hello Am asking for assistance on that article because all i wrote in the article is true. I got everything from the main source when he was interviewed. This person i wrote about is a new fashion rocking teenager In uganda so he doesn’t have that much references online about him because he just made his breakthrough. This person was discovered on instagram. Thanks for your assistance Kendoma (talk) 10:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * I don't understand why you linked G. K. W. Perera in your question. Are you asking about User:Kendoma/sandbox (Ssentongo Faizo, better known as Fai Styles)? What do you mean by "got everything from the main source when he was interviewed"? Do you mean Faizo told you personally? Do you mean an interview with Faizo was published somewhere, and you drew your information from there? The draft is unacceptable because it cites no published, reliable, secondary sources independent of Faizo, that contain significant coverage of him. If he "just made his breakthrough", there may be no such sources, or too few such sources, in which case he unsuitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:25, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

11:13:30, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Sucharita Sen
My article has been cancelled by the reviewer and the reason showing is lack of references. But I have given IMdb website and a person's personal website for reference. But it's not acceptable according to wikipedia rules. This is a Script Writer's biography so please help me ehich type reference or citations will be accepted?? Sucharita Sen (talk) 11:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * - hi there. Notability in Wikipedia is demonstrated by the use of sources that are: secondary (newspapers, books etc); reliable (good editorial control, trustworthy); independent (no reason to be biased, which means most interviews are out) & have significant coverage (at least a few paragraphs about the individual).


 * best thing to do is take a look at a few good articles in Wikipedia to see the sources there. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

12:10:11, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Moonsoftwizz
Moonsoftwizz (talk) 12:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

12:40:56, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Hosseini.1991
I would like to know what changes I need to make exactly in order to have this article accepted. I do not understand why it is contradictory to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Thank you for your help.

Hosseini.1991 (talk) 12:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

13:44:40, 28 June 2019 review of submission by Samrt tech

, I consider the article possibly acceptable as is, but it would more clearly show notability by WP:PROF with a list of his 4 or 5 most widely cited papers, giving citation counts.The moresignificant problem is a promotional tone:  It should   avoid statements  such as "Raunser commits himself to the development and understanding of the molecular ... " and  the adjectives in "The Raunser group provided the first high-resolution structure of an actin-tropomyosin-myosin complex, bringing about new insights into this important macromolecular complex." need to be omitted. (And note that we can claim "first" only if there is a reliable Third Party source that justifies that claim Its usually better to rewrite to avoid the explicit claim).  DGG ( talk ) 09:20, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Request on 13:44:40, 28 June 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Samrt tech
Samrt tech (talk) 13:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

15:34:27, 28 June 2019 review of submission by BigBigL
BigBigL (talk) 15:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Why bother with a service like this if you're going to allow incapable reviewers to make assumptions about COI. My article was declined because of COI so I reviewed the COI rules and fail to understand how I have a personal conflict with this listing. I'm just trying to enrich your community of info but if your site is so slanted to not easily allow actual real contributions then perhaps I should stop using wiki altogether. I'm out here trying to contribute meaningful info and some hack declines it. This is beyond ridiculous, considering I just spent over 2 hours making a listing that should have already existed on this site.
 * Entirely aside from any concern regarding COI; given it appears sections of the article have been copied directly from the organisation's website  , in addition to the complete lack of reliable secondary sources, leads me to concur with the decision of User:Jeff G. to decline the article. --Jack Frost (talk) 15:58, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

15:54:15, 28 June 2019 review of draft by Pgk707
As you suggested, I have merged both versions in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ERCIM Is there any possibility to delete https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:European_Research_Consortium_for_Informatics_and_Mathematics and resubmit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ERCIM ? thanks for your help

Pgk707 (talk) 15:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * You are not the only substantial contributor to Draft:European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics, so you may not delete it, but if it is abandoned it will be deleted after 6 months. To submit Draft:ERCIM, add  to the top of the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

17:27:55, 28 June 2019 review of draft by Superbrickbro
What would I need to add to this page to make it notable? I am just a beginner, so can someone tell me specific things I need to add to this document to make it able to be notable for and article status? Superbrickbro (talk) 17:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * At least three reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject and contain significant coverage (not mere passing mentions) of the subject are needed to demonstrate notability. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:43, 29 June 2019 (UTC)