Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 June 8

= June 8 =

00:40:18, 8 June 2019 review of draft by Imperial Numismatics
I need help to become a reviewer. Any help?

Imperial Numismatics (talk) 00:40, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * You cannot review your own draft article. David notMD (talk) 01:41, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

09:26:40, 8 June 2019 review of submission by Scharrlib
I would like this page reviewed again as I think I've made the correct changes in line with Wikipedia's remit. The page refers to an international school of health research, and it comparable to other schools that are published on Wikipedia. The University of Sheffield has a page on the iSchool and The Management School, The School of Health and Related Research is also a university school, with international esteem and high impact in the field of health research. It started at the same time as the York Centre of Reviews and Dissemination - both inform NHS policy and deliver high impact research and teaching. ScHARR is a bigger department and publishes more high impact research. ScHARR also has notable ex staff and alumni.

Andy

Scharrlib (talk) 09:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

11:29:47, 8 June 2019 review of submission by Eel6529
I have added more information pending for your review. Please let me know if this is competent enough to be published. Eel6529 (talk) 11:29, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . Rejection is intended to be final, to convey that the subject is not notable, so no amount of editing will make the draft publishable here. You may wish to consider alternative outlets that have different inclusion criteria. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:06, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

13:32:07, 8 June 2019 review of submission by 196.126.26.10
Hello, Why the Ian Foote Wikipedia page has not sumbited ? There are all sources about this football referee. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.124.75.161 (talk) 19:05, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

196.126.26.10 (talk) 13:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

15:00:45, 8 June 2019 review of submission by TroyMPGA
The reason given was contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia...I am a 20year PGA teaching pro that was trying to publish an informative article to educate people on the importance and vital part of golf instruction which is GOLF TRAINING AIDS. There is little no information on this on wiki. Golf training aids are as important to Golf as a golf club or any other piece of equipment because clubs, balls, putters are useless unless someone knows how to use them which brings me back to my first point which is golf instruction. I tried to write it as general as possible and wasn't selling any particular training aid but presenting facts that golf training aids can accelerate the golf learning process and the should be employed by all golfers...so please elaborate on why this article is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Thank you TroyMPGA (talk) 15:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . Wikipedia may not be used to advocate for, or "get the word out" about, anything. The draft is not an encyclopedia article summarizing what reliable secondary sources have written on the subject, but an opinion piece encouraging the use of golf training aids. So it is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. If you want to help build an encyclopedia, see Community portal for ways to participate. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:03, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

15:53:11, 8 June 2019 review of submission by Michaelkallys
Hi,

I humbly ask a re-review on this because I would like you to consider the hard work this 3 year old genius is doing. She’s very famous in Nigeria, the post popular Nigerian kid. I did provide an article to read. You can also google her name to see more. I also provided her Instagram page just so you see how huge her following / interaction is.

If there’s further information you need me to provide, please advise. I’m trying to give my daughter the recognition she deserves. Safaree started generating her own income from age 2. She’s loved by her fans.

Michaelkallys (talk) 15:53, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Request on 18:14:33, 8 June 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Sushilweb
Please let me know the reason for rejection and what improvements I need to do to get the acceptance from Wikipedia.

Thanks, Sushil

Sushilweb (talk) 18:14, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

18:15:30, 8 June 2019 review of submission by Sushilweb
Please let me know the reason for rejection and what improvements I need to do to get the acceptance from Wikipedia.

Thanks, Sushil

Sushilweb (talk) 18:15, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * You need to provide references to articles written about the subject in unrelated, independent journals, magazines, books, etc. We have no interest in what they say about themselves. The topic doesn't appear to be notable. Theroadislong (talk) 18:46, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

21:04:22, 8 June 2019 review of submission by Taiwanbro101
Can someone help me improve my draft "Marshall M.H Shen"

Taiwanbro101 (talk) 21:04, 8 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, the message by means that there is nothing you could do to fix the problem. The article subject is not notable enough, an issue (over)simplified in WP:42. Please do not spend more time on this. If you would like to contribute to Wikipedia, please see The Wikipedia Adventure and our community portal for new ideas. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:16, 9 June 2019 (UTC)