Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 March 11

= March 11 =

05:21:25, 11 March 2019 review of submission by Mukesh Kumar Rao
I am requesting you, why you rejected this page. And tell me please what is the reason for rejection. Is I am violating any term or condition policy of Wikipedia. What is the thing should I follow to create this page. I am editing this page for a very geniue person. Who I am knowing personally, and He given me all the content which I write on this page, so there is no copyright issue arises. Please guide me to publish this page. Thanks in advance for Helping to create this page.

Mukesh Kumar Rao (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:PROMO, it is a resume, fails WP:N and totally formated wrong. Page deleted and user blocked Legacypac (talk) 05:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

05:28:11, 11 March 2019 review of submission by Ukunsumo
Can you help me to validate my own page in the sand box. See the link above Ukunsumo (talk) 05:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC) Hi all, I am a freelance web developer based in Japan. I wanted to create my own page in the sandbox as shown on YouTube. I received an error message: "Submission declined on 11 March 2019 by PrussianOwl (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources."

Can you give me some advices on how to resolve this issue. Cheers, Remi
 * Hi . Unlike Facebook, LinkedIn, or similar networking sites, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not a place to write about yourself. See Autobiography for more information --Worldbruce (talk) 05:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Request on 07:08:40, 11 March 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by RSMPAO
Good morning Sir, I am the Public Affairs Officers of the NATO Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan. I wrote Draft:Salvatore Camporeale's draft and I always tried to modify it by following your suggestions. You tell me that the text is copied from the Resolute Support website https://rs.nato.int. However, I ask you to approve my draft for the following reasons: - I modified the draft by quoting the source from which I got the information (ie the Resolute Support website); - I modified the text as much as possible, but better than that I can not do because it is a short biography of General Camporeale; - in my opinion there is no copyright infringement because I am the Public Affairs of Resolute Support Missione, I am the webmaster of the Resolute Support website and I wrote the biography of General Camporeale which is published on https: // rs. nato.int. Please, I ask you, kindly, to help me write the draft in order for it to be published. Thanks in advance.

RSMPAO (talk) 07:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)


 * , . Pls disclose your COI on your user page and the Draft:Salvatore Camporeale article talk page - pls see the COI info and instructions at your talk page. Also, pls note that Wikipedia highly discourage (not welcome) editor with COI to edit/create the affected page as content at times does not meet WP:NPOV. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Ma'am  CASSIOPEIA(talk), I followed your suggestion disclosing my COI on user page and on the Draft:Salvatore Camporeale. I try to be as neutral as possible, but the article is a simple biography. Please let me know if I have to do something else.
 * Thank you very much.


 * Greetings. Pls note the disclosure should be placed on (1) User page and (2) Article "talk" page and not article page. Pls read and follow instructions provided and rework. Please Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes .. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

07:17:07, 11 March 2019 review of submission by Savithashanmugam
Because there is no copyright content, or any kind of issues so that kindly re-review it. Savithashanmugam (talk) 07:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Copyright isn't the only issue. You need to provide in-line citations to at least three professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources that are specifically and primarily about Kamalakannan but not affiliated with him, not dependent upon him, and not connected to him in any way.
 * Soundcloud is not a professional-publishing site, it is user generated. At any rate, an interview with him is not independent.  The same goes for his Vimeo video.
 * This blog is also user generated. Don't bother citing blogs, the general rule is that they're not considered reliable (the exceptions to that rule are so rare that there's no point in looking for reliable blogs).
 * His production company's website is not independent.
 * The rest of the sources only mention him in passing. They are not specifically and primarily about him.  There's a potential case that the movie Madhubaanakadai might be notable, but not Kamalakannan.
 * You can find detailed but simple instructions on how to write an article here. If you follow them exactly, the resulting article should be approved with little trouble.  Ian.thomson (talk) 00:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

12:59:27, 11 March 2019 review of draft by Lpouliot
The title of my Wiki article contains an error. It now reads Blake pouliot. Both first and last names should be capitalized to read Blake Pouliot. I do not seem have the faculty to make this edit. Can you do this for me? Thank you. Lpouliot (talk) 12:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

✅ Legacypac (talk) 22:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

21:17:27, 11 March 2019 review of submission by Jordanslp312
After the helpful comments from DGG, all concerns raised were explicitly addressed, specifically showing significant coverage about Siraj's work in published, reliable, secondary sources (including a standalone piece in Forbes, among several others), as well as showing evidence that the scientific works referenced in the Wikipedia page is attributable to Siraj, given his first authorships. It is therefore puzzling what about the entry does not meet notability guidelines. It is also worth mentioning that Siraj appears in the Wikipedia entry on 'Oumuamua and on interstellar objects. Interstellar objects are a brand new field of astronomy; one of Siraj's works has pioneered the study of trapped objects, and another work has become one of the most-read Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society.

Jordanslp312 (talk) 21:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . Is there any criterion of notability guideline WP:SCHOLAR that you believe the subject meets? If so, which one? --Worldbruce (talk) 15:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

23:41:46, 11 March 2019 review of draft by April2019
I AM INQUIRING WHY THE CONTENT IS NOT CONSIDERED NOTABLE OR CREDIBLE SOURCES. THE SOURCES ARE FROM HUFFINGTON POST, CBS, NBC, AND OTHER NEWS MEDIA. WHAT INFORMATION IS CONSIDERED NOTABLE. THE COMPANY IS CONSIDERED VERY SUCCESSFUL IN LATIN AMERICA AND IS BURGEONING QUICKLY IN THE UNITED STATES. April2019 (talk) 23:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Step 1) Turn off your caps lock.
 * Step 2) Provide In-line citations to professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources that are specifically and primarily about Karen Hoyos International but completely independent of and not affiliated with KHI.
 * The sources you cited do not meet that standard. They are either about a walk that Karen Hoyos participated in (with no mention of KHI), or they're affiliated sources (such as this press release).  They are also just tacked on to the end, so nothing that's actually said in the draft is verified.
 * I recommend you start over, following these very simple instructions. If you follow those, the article will be approved with no trouble. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Responding to similar query found at the Teahouse. Not to dash anyone's hopes, but based on the sourcing that is there now, and what I was able to find with a simple Google search, there's not enough media coverage for Karen Hoyos International or Ms. Hoyos for an article. You have to avoid blogs and social media sites where she and her team control the content, and there's not much else. Sorry I couldn't be more encouraging. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  00:31, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

23:50:18, 11 March 2019 review of draft by Paramanjara
Hi, I am trying to find out why an short article I wrote wasn't deemed fit for adding. It is with regards to the film Rhythm Serenade starring Vera Lynn. Is it purely because I didn't cite IMDB for the cast and production team. I also have seen the film which I had noted didn't have it's own wiki entry for some reason. Thanks

Paramanjara (talk) 23:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * You need to cite at least three professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources that are specifically and primarily about the movie Rhythm Serenade but are not affiliated with nor dependent upon the movie's studio, distributors, actors, nor anyone else involved with it.
 * IMDB is written by fewer monkeys on typewriters than Wikipedia uses, so they're not accepted as a source.
 * Most Youtube videos are submitted by random users and not actually verification of anything.
 * You can find detailed but simple instructions covering everything you need to do to write an article here. If you follow those steps exactly, the article will be approved in no time. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)