Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 March 17

= March 17 =

Request on 04:51:21, 17 March 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Mrphilip
SOMEONE USED G12 Deletion three hours after you first left word on my first submission of this article. That review took less than 24 hours, no where near the proposed timeframe of up to 8 weeks given when submitted. WOW. Can't we fix this so I may continue to work on my article about a new part of the NIH which fact under the LGBT WIKIPROJECT Umbrella. Also, how do I add that link t my article? I forget. Mrphilip (talk) 04:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

17:14, 16 March 2019 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Sexual and Gender Minority Research Office (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://isgmh.northwestern.edu/2017/01/20/21st-century-cures-act-calls-for-expanded-nih-focus-on-sexual-and-gender-minority-health/, http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/DBASSE_191476.PDF) (thank) I WON'T THANK THEM, I WISH TO REPORT THEM FOR ABUSING G12 WHEN EARLIER VERSIONS SAVED THAT VERY DAY EXISTED WITHOUT THE NORTHWESTERN MATERIAL AND THE ARTICLE COULD HAVE REVERTED TO ANY OTHER POINT IN ARTCLE HISTORY. THE NORTHWESTERN TEXT WAS ONE OF THE VERY LAST ADDITIONS TO THIS ARTICLE. THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES REFERENCED MATERIAL WAS ALSO ADDED ON FRIDAY. If they had a problem with copyright, you revert before delete. I know this and I am a novice on WIKI. Mrphilip (talk) 04:56, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Mrphilip (talk) 04:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)


 * You got speedy service. Some pages take 8 weeks to get to. Don't post copy vio. Don't go to User:RHaworth's page and YELL at him for deleting your illegal reposting of content. Legacypac (talk) 04:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

08:11:48, 17 March 2019 review of draft by 2604:2000:E010:1100:11EA:267:1884:8E5E
I keep on trying to submit a draft for review. But it does not work. Can you please do it? The draft is Draft:Gamal Aziz. --2604:2000:E010:1100:11EA:267:1884:8E5E (talk) 08:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

2604:2000:E010:1100:11EA:267:1884:8E5E (talk) 08:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm going to accept it. Subject is notable before the current criminal charges. Legacypac (talk) 08:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you. For some reason the categories don't appear. And there is stuff in code at the bottom of the page when you open it up for editing that I am guessing should not be there. 2604:2000:E010:1100:11EA:267:1884:8E5E (talk) 08:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * FYI, I corrected those errors. There was an open-ended comment just below the references section that was hiding all that content when the page rendered normally, but you could see it clearly in the code. Everything should be good now. Great job on the article! You should consider creating an account! - Paul T [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psantora&action=edit +]/C 16:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

10:55:52, 17 March 2019 review of draft by HolmanPark
I cannot understand why I am unable to load images that are in my ownership and were taken by myself. Please help.

HolmanPark (talk) 10:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

12:13:14, 17 March 2019 review of draft by Ugneszewski
Hello, is there any process to fast-track the review for this well-referenced article, thanks: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:William_Nanda_Bissell

Ugneszewski (talk) 12:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * What's your hurry, and what is your connection with him? I have removed a lot of promotional trumpery for you.Theroadislong (talk) 12:27, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

13:18:33, 17 March 2019 review of submission by PortlyJackson
I have modified the article to correct a citation to the principal notability reference. It now uses the correct magazine template. I have made statements concerning notability on the article's Talk page, specifically claims for 1st and 3rd notability inclusion criteria. Appreciate if you could re-review on the basis of the Talk page and updated article.

PortlyJackson (talk) 13:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

14:46:05, 17 March 2019 review of draft by Pequena Princesa
Very well I will not post the photo now and just try to get the draft approved by increasing the number of sources first. But I would never publish it without a photo, when all the artists have one: it would be insulting to the artist. So the issue is still live. By the way, the Voice-Tribune of Louisville have a great photo of Marisa in concert there which they took themselves: clear copyright. But they want to sell it for US$18. Does Wikipedia have a budget for that? If so, please tell me how to submit the claim for the Voice-Tribune. If wikipedia don't have a budget, wikipedia really need to change their policy and allow any photo already published where the publisher does not object to its use on wikipedia.org. Pequena Princesa (talk) 14:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)


 * - Wikipedia doesn't buy copyright photos. Our photo rules, excepting a few fair use cases which don't apply here, have to have a broader license than I think would be the case if we opted just for the cases you propose. This is to let us make our information globally reusable - anyone is allowed to copy Wikipedia's data, and license changes would prevent that. Nosebagbear (talk) 07:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

17:02:46, 17 March 2019 review of draft by Lioninthewild
I am writing to inquire whether I have submitted the draft successfully or not. Lioninthewild (talk) 17:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Clearly meets WP:NPOL so will accept. Well done. Legacypac (talk) 21:33, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

17:34:26, 17 March 2019 review of submission by Rumbidzainokutenda
Hi, i'm requesting for assistance because i'm new and i'm still learning. I have made some changes on my first article (Draft), i really wanna know if there is other parts i should add or correct or just some advice you want to share with me

Rumbidzainokutenda (talk) 17:34, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that as the note on your draft says "This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia." You have no independent reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 19:00, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

18:52:37, 17 March 2019 review of draft by Isegarth
Isegarth (talk) 18:52, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

I have submitted an article (Ludwig Loewe -DWM) and have copied the list of footnotes that has now finished up in wrong position and not formatted correctly. I would be grateful for a link with simple-- i9nstructions on how to format footnotes. Thank You! Patrick Isegarth (talk) 18:52, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * You will find help with formatting sources here WP:REFB. Theroadislong (talk) 19:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)