Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 March 25

= March 25 =

05:30:44, 25 March 2019 review of submission by Srinath kandala
Srinath kandala (talk) 05:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * What is your question? --Worldbruce (talk) 12:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

14:46:47, 25 March 2019 review of draft by Ksaraf
Draft:American Capital

This article was rejected by reviewer User:Hell_in_a_Bucket (before the article was even completed). I have completely revamped the article according to the reviewer comments. But reviewer is now retired and this draft is just sitting abandoned. I am requesting someone to take a look and provide commentary or approve the article. Thanks. Ksaraf (talk) 14:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Ksaraf (talk) 14:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * A few things, please see [] this is the edit just previous to my review and this is the edit review []. If you look carefully from that first link is 11/27/18 the big green banner at the top said awaiting review which lasted until my edit declining it 12/17/18. I was labeled as semi-retired until just recently although I am not active a lot. If the article is ready resubmit it and wait out the process. It can be frustrating to wait but it will happen. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

17:20:30, 25 March 2019 review of submission by Scharrlib
Scharrlib (talk) 17:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * As written it is promotional with very little detail as to how it is important and having it sourced. The concept is good but maybe take a look at similar articles before resubmitting. An example of how to write an article like this would be Auraria 9th Street Historic District. State the fact not the mission and the minute details. Report what can be sourced. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

18:09:05, 25 March 2019 review of draft by Infofan001
The draft entry on Jenny Dixon - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jenny_Dixon - was last reviewed and declined on October 15, 2018. The reason given was "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources." The sources that support the submission include: The New York Times (nytimes.com), the winner of numerous Pulitzer Prizes; Artnews (artnews.com), the website of an art magazine founded in 1901 and winner of numerous national, regional, and local awards; artnet news (https://news.artnet.com/), the first on-line only news and critical magazine about art; the New York Daily News (nydailynews.com), a well established New York City newspaper; Ford Foundation Annual Report (fordfoundation.org); WNYC.org, New York City's public radio station

Please advise on what sources would be considered reliable if not these or what could be submitted in terms of substantiation.

Infofan001 (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * From your post it appears you did not read the reviewer comments. The page is close to, or now ok. Legacypac (talk) 18:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Request on 18:49:37, 25 March 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by EklerBettina
I simply don't see what is wrong with my submission

EklerBettina (talk) 18:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * It's not formatted or sourced appropriately in a manner ready for publishing. See WP:MOS and also maybe the help section for citation help so it shows correctly. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 18:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Help:Referencing for beginners is more relevant. Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

19:14:37, 25 March 2019 review of draft by Joanne at Sogetsu
I inserted in my draft(Ethel Blanchard Collver) a photo which yesterday I uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. The File name in Wikimedia Commons is entitled "Self Portrait by Ethel Blanchard Collver". However, even though the file name and caption appeared in the right hand corner of my draft, there was no photo. The file name was in red and when I clicked on it, there was direction on how to upload a photo. I thought I had alreday done that? I do not understand why the photo was not inserted? What am I missing? Thank you for any assistance with this. Joanne at Sogetsu (talk) 19:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Joanne at Sogetsu (talk) 19:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . I've fixed it for you. The file type,, needed to be at the end of the file name where you used the image on a page. If you have more questions about using images, see the tutorial Help:Pictures. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

19:42:44, 25 March 2019 review of submission by Sudesh D Ingale
Sudesh D Ingale (talk) 19:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi . Editors may create a user page to share limited autobiographical information for the purpose of collaboration with other editors. If that was what you were trying to do with Draft:Sudesh Ingale, then you do not need to submit it for review. Simply write at User:Sudesh D Ingale.


 * It is draft articles that need to be submitted for review before being published as encyclopedia articles. If that is what your draft submission was intended as, then please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). --Worldbruce (talk) 19:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

20:07:38, 25 March 2019 review of submission by 41.115.121.152
41.115.121.152 (talk) 20:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Your draft is blank? Theroadislong (talk) 20:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

21:29:27, 25 March 2019 review of submission by MoeeyAchived
MoeeyAchived (talk) 21:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * - this is clearly not suitable (or perhaps not truly intended) to be a Wikipedia article. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)