Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 May 15

= May 15 =

01:57:37, 15 May 2019 review of submission by Aosmali
how and where this article looks like an advertisement ?!!!!!!!!!!!! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:MadinahScript Aosmali (talk) 01:57, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

05:39:30, 15 May 2019 review of draft by Yche3321
I have checked the link that the editors provided. The article is called Artemisia absinthium, which only has a lttle about uses but for my article, it paid more attention on it， so it is different for our subjects of articles.

Yche3321 (talk) 05:39, 15 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Greetings. Please add/merge the info from your article to Artemisia absinthium as you have been informed by 3 different reviewers at your sandbox  by User:Bkissin  User:Curb Safe Charmer and User:Praxidicae  and  by Bkissin (again) and I to merge / add info to existing article Artemisia absinthium and kindly do so. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:05, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

11:17:55, 15 May 2019 review of submission by Wp4321
Hello, I posted an article about celette that was rejected due to some reasons I do not fully understand. I used all the appropriate links and information that was all correct. Wp4321 (talk) 11:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . The draft cites press releases, trade journals, and a newspaper article in which an executive says a few words about the company. Such sources do nothing to demonstrate notability (suitability for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:10, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

11:56:44, 15 May 2019 review of submission by Papi Paul Poeme
I am requesting a re-review because i want to make money Papi Paul Poeme (talk) 11:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)


 * , Please see What Wikipedia is not. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:04, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

16:31:41, 15 May 2019 review of submission by Kranthi Kumar Mukkera
Kranthi Kumar Mukkera (talk) 16:31, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

17:08:48, 15 May 2019 review of submission by Kranthi Kumar Mukkera
Kranthi Kumar Mukkera (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

20:06:29, 15 May 2019 review of submission by Jessie Trapp
I made updates to keep things purely factual as my intent is not to promote MoxiWorks, but to merely define what it is. Jessie Trapp (talk) 20:06, 15 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi . Even mentioning the company on Wikipedia is likely to be seen as promotional, especially when the draft cites zero independent, reliable, secondary sources containing significant coverage of the company. You may find WP:BFAQ informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:04, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

20:30:30, 15 May 2019 review of draft by Asherdbwiseman
So this was rejected because I copied and pasted the episode description from Channel 4s website? Would erasing that help? What's that stuff about reliable sources? it really is a TV show that airs on Channel 4.

Asherdbwiseman (talk) 20:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . Just because something exists does not mean it is a suitable subject for an encyclopedia article. To demonstrate notability (suitability for inclusion), multiple, independent, reliable sources are needed that contain significant information about the topic. The channel's website (as well as the show's, the producer's, the star's, etc.) may be reliable, but are not independent - they have a vested interest in promoting the show. Reliable and independent sources would be something like reviews in The Guardian or The Times, or a scholarly book that contains a page or two about the show. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:58, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

22:50:33, 15 May 2019 review of submission by Ryan Mindo
Ryan Mindo (talk) 22:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)


 * - this both completely lacked sources, so couldn't demonstrate notability, and was heavily promotional. As such the review was right to reject it Nosebagbear (talk) 15:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)