Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 May 2

= May 2 =

01:45:19, 2 May 2019 review of draft by INeedSupport
I'm having trouble finding a secondary reliable source that is outside the main location of the restaurant—which is Indiana. Based on what John from Idegon said, I have at least one reliable, secondary source in it. Is there a way to find more? Thanks!  I Need Support  :3 01:45, 2 May 2019 (UTC)  I Need Support  :3 01:45, 2 May 2019 (UTC)


 * - depending on what your search issue is, you might try either adding keywords or blocking out others (e.g. "-KEYWORD"). Blocking out the local newspaper that you already have might make others come to the fore.


 * It's unlikely, but always take a look at google book search etc, not just the "All" and "News" options.


 * The chain may well just not have enough notability yet, at least to meet the higher requirements of corporate notability. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:17, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 *  I Need Support  :3 02:31, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll just post another review of draft instead of pinging the user instead.  I Need Support  :3 13:21, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

02:41:33, 2 May 2019 review of submission by CruzBebe
I've updated the page addressing all the errors you've provided me. CruzBebe (talk) 02:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * - The subject simply isn't notable. He fails wikipedias guidelines on notable musicians. Being nominated for the "Rap / Hip Hop Artist of the Year" in Western Canada simply isn't notable. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:00, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

05:30:14, 2 May 2019 review of submission by Krutika Samnani
My draft Crave Eatables, had previously been declined included with following source: https://www.zaubacorp.com/company/CRAVE-EATABLES-PRIVATE-LIMITED/U15122MH2012PTC235346

Now in Haldirams, following source is included: https://companycheck.co.uk/company/03522846/HALDIRAMS-FOODS-LIMITED/companies-house-data

Just check this out,as both sources are similiar in nature; so why my draft was not accepted? And that's fine but please guide that my above mentioned source is reliable or not? Krutika Samnani (talk) 05:30, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * These sources are just routine listings and of no use, we require in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 16:48, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Request on 08:51:36, 2 May 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Webplanet12345
Hello,

I need your assistance on getting my newly create page approve. The page is about David J. Maloney, and it's the second time that the page was rejected, the first time the editorial board cited no reference source & citation, which I've corrected but the second time nothing give for the rejection.

koya (talk) 08:51, 2 May 2019 (UTC)


 * - it was rejected on notability grounds because none of the sources provided were suitable: The point streaks site (which appears to just duplicate the SPHL site) couldn't be independent because they're talking about a now-owner, and they also only spend 4 lines on Maloney himself, most of which are his quotes. The 2nd isn't about him, so doesn't provide notability (it's also a primary website, so Maloney's wouldn't count, though it might help with basic facts) and the 3rd is a press release, so is inherently non-independent.


 * Remember, sources have to satisfy all 4 of: "in-depth, reliable, independent and secondary" Nosebagbear (talk) 10:23, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

15:50:14, 2 May 2019 review of submission by Abovingdon
Thanks for your feedback on my recent submission for an Audiens page. This was needed to sit alongside the existing Bango page. I specifically wrote it as a factual, non business view of the company. I am looking to add more independent sources as requested.

I agree it should list my connection with the company - I have added that. Is there any way to have the words independently reviewed to ensure factual accuracy? We don't want to pay for someone to add these facts.

Looking for guidance.

Abovingdon (talk) 15:50, 2 May 2019 (UTC)


 * - thank you for adding the connection.


 * With response to your factual accuracy, putting it through AfC means a degree of review will occur. I'm a tad confused - are you not satisfied with your own factual accuracy?


 * I would ask that, on the talk page, you state the four best sources that talk about the company itself that are "in-depth, reliable, independent and secondary". Please don't focus on the seed capital/VC ones, and remember that interviews without analysis aren't independent. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:01, 2 May 2019 (UTC)


 * - thanks for your input.


 * Yes, I'm very satisfied with the accuracy. I was simply wondering if an independent review would resolve any outstanding concerns about conflict of interest etc.?


 * I have added more citations, but not sure if they meet the criteria. I'm struggling a bit to gauge compliance. I will look to add the 4 best sources to the talk page. Abovingdon (talk) 15:50, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

17:37:03, 2 May 2019 review of draft by Barry Bernas
I received a comment to my submission that it needs to be wikified. I searched for what that meant and found nothing of help. What do I need to do to wikify my submission?

Barry Bernas (talk) 17:37, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Wikifying is to format the article by using Wiki markup - see Help:Wikitext. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

22:47:00, 2 May 2019 review of submission by DanStallman
I have removed what I think the Reviewers are indicating is "Memorial". Please let me know if this is acceptable.

Thank you, DanStallman (talk) 22:47, 2 May 2019 (UTC)