Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 May 27

= May 27 =

03:16:43, 27 May 2019 review of submission by Lolos2508
How can I improve this page to make it better.

Lolos2508 (talk) 03:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The draft has no references and no indication as to why it might be notable. Theroadislong (talk) 11:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

08:45:06, 27 May 2019 review of submission by Mifriend3
I have removed any information that would suggest this is a "Promotional article in disguise" as indicated by the previous reviewer. Please take a look again. Thanks!

Mifriend3 (talk) 08:45, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The topic is not notable and has only a single (spam) reference. Theroadislong (talk) 11:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

14:34:05, 27 May 2019 review of submission by Dinakarr
Hi CASSIOPEIA,

Many thanks for your suggestion. Actually I did click on the "Resubmit" button you mentioned but instead of giving me a confirmation of submission, it takes me to the page with the following title -

<>

So I am not sure if the article is now being reconsidered. Is there a way to confirm this?

Also many thanks for your Talk-page. It looks like a place where I can learn lots of new things!

Regards, Dinakar Dinakarr (talk) 14:34, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I just submitted a completely revamped page for "Widow of Silence" with credible references and citations on this award-winning film. While I did click on the "Resubmit" button, I am not sure if the revised article has gone for the review process. Would you please check and let me know?

Thanks, Dinakar Dinakarr (talk) 09:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Dinakarr (talk) 09:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Greetings. You have not yet to submit the draft for reviewed. Pls click the "Resubmit" button on the left bottom pink panel on top of the page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

10:44:30, 27 May 2019 review of submission by LLcentury
LLcentury (talk) 13:48, 27 May 2019 (UTC) !-- Hi! Nice to meet you! I've done my best, could fine nothing more about him, if declined, deleted or rejected I will take it positively as experience as beginner on editing. Thank you so much. Best wishes. --LLcentury (talk) 13:51, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

16:38:45, 27 May 2019 review of submission by Gesielgbernardes
Hi, The Hogzilla IDS was marked of "not notable". And I don't understand why. The Hogzilla IDS is the main software usabled as concept of IDS using machine learning and big data. The Hogzilla IDS was plublishided in many cientistics articles and Master's and PhD theses around the world. In references is including various link's that confirm this. Please note that Hogziila IDS is NOT COMERCIAL, and developed by University of Campinas (Unicamp).

Gesielgbernardes (talk) 16:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

21:27:19, 27 May 2019 review of submission by Jessiecarbone3
Hi - I am having trouble understanding why my article is still being reject. Do you have advice on how I can improve this to make it more notable?

Jessiecarbone3 (talk) 21:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

22:08:40, 27 May 2019 review of submission by 89.164.167.75
My article was rejected as it does not show significant coverage... Many current Wikipedia articles on Croatian architects don't show significant coverage (especially in English) see for example Hinko Bauer and Nikola Bašić yet no one should question their notability. Ivan Vulic (along with several other major Croatian architects) was mentioned in Vasko Lipovac and Split Airport article so I decided to submit short article about him. Croatian architects are generally poorly represented on Wikipedia and those that are have poorly written and referenced articles. 89.164.167.75 (talk) 22:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

23:50:07, 27 May 2019 review of draft by AminNash
Thank you for taking the time to review my draft.

I am writing an article on Evelyn Shakir's "Remember Me to Lebanon". The book was published by Syracuse Press in 2007 and won the Arab American book award in 2008.

I referenced a link to the Award website on my page.

My article was rejected due to references. Here are links to scholarly articles that discuss the book:

http://ccl.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ccl.idm.oclc.org/docview/897936818?accountid=10141

http://ccl.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ccl.idm.oclc.org/docview/203711805?accountid=10141

http://ccl.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ccl.idm.oclc.org/docview/356821662?accountid=10141

These are from ProQuest and there are also articles available on JSTOR and World Cat.

Please instruct me on how to properly add these references to the article. This book has been studied and I am trying to write this article without any sense of bias.

AminNash (talk) 23:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . The draft already uses the template cite web to cite one source. I've added examples of how to use other templates in the same family, cite news and cite journal, to cite the Boston Globe obituary and a JSTOR article, respectively. ProQuest urls are not very useful in citations because they are library-specific, and few Wikipedia readers use the same library as you. A free url is available for the obit, so I've used that instead of the ProQuest url. The MELUS article is also on JSTOR, so it can be cited in the same way as Modern Fiction Studies. For the thesis, use the cite thesis template and leave the url blank (sources needn't be available online). I hope that helps. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:04, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Worldbruce (talk)


 * Hi ,

Thanks for the details as well as the instructions for citing the articles properly. Also, thanks for locating the free URL for the ProQuest links - I didn't know that they were library-specific.

I'll try to make the appropriate edits to the article as well as locate some better sources.

Thanks again - AminNash (talk)