Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 May 4

= May 4 =

01:09:21, 4 May 2019 review of submission by ShyhBCRaps
ShyhBCRaps (talk) 01:09, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Because i want it to get approved how do i make it better


 * Hi . The musician is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). Rejection of the draft is meant to be final, to convey that no amount of editing will make the topic acceptable here. You may wish to consider alternative outlets, with different inclusion criteria, for what you've written. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

05:40:05, 4 May 2019 review of submission by Abnerclymer
Abnerclymer (talk) 05:40, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

08:26:43, 4 May 2019 review of submission by Swatians
Swatians (talk) 08:26, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that this topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 08:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

09:49:03, 4 May 2019 review of submission by Wordsfrombimpe
Wordsfrombimpe (talk) 09:49, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

What can I do to my article published on Wikipedia?


 * Hi . The musician is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). Rejection of the draft is meant to be final, to convey that no amount of editing will make the topic acceptable for publication here. You may wish to consider alternative outlets, with different inclusion criteria, for what you've written. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

10:12:12, 4 May 2019 review of submission by Adamszala
I have searched the relevant sources and made the hyperlinks and the account detail like company information (Wunwun) also updated in Hello Alfred Wikipedia page, and now I hope it's full fill the wiki terms. Adamszala (talk) 10:12, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 14:10, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

19:25:36, 4 May 2019 review of draft by HirmizM
The webpage keeps saying I need to add inline citations, however, I already have multiple citations in the page. Not sure what I'm doing wrong here.

HirmizM (talk) 19:25, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


 * - hi, as far as I can tell, you haven't been declined since January. At that point, your sources weren't inline but instead were general - that is, you had a list of sources at the bottom that applied to the whole page, but not linked to specific statements (which appear as the blue numbers).


 * You've now done that, so that decline reason wouldn't apply.


 * You do need to resubmit it, and then it will be reviewed in the fullness to time (there's currently a long backlog I'm afraid - the yellow box will indicate roughly how long, though some are done much more quickly). Nosebagbear (talk) 19:31, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


 * It would benefit from more independent reliable sources. The New York Times source is only a passing mention and the Daily Mail is not a great quality source. The 2 Times-Picayune sources are OK. -Lopifalko (talk) 10:35, 6 May 2019 (UTC)