Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 November 14

= November 14 =

02:06:45, 14 November 2019 review of draft by StarFremwell
I wish to add an Infobox on my draft article for a book. I'm not sure how to create one with an image, or what categories should be in it. I also wish for some advice. StarFremwell (talk) 02:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , Firstly, please make sure you have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic first. If you can't find this, then the book can't have a Wikipedia article, as it would be impossible to verify the contents.
 * To answer your question, Template:Infobox book is used to add an infobox. There are details of the parameters on that page. To add it to an article, you add
 * and so on to the article.
 * and so on to the article.
 * and so on to the article.


 * As an image for the book will be copyrighted, you can only add an image to the infobox once the article is published, under the provisions of fair use - see WP:NFCI for details.
 * I don't really know the details of categorisation, so I'll let someone else answer that one.
 * Thanks,  Oxon Alex    - talk  09:35, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks,  Oxon Alex    - talk  09:35, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks,  Oxon Alex    - talk  09:35, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

05:50:04, 14 November 2019 review of submission by Crocatoot
What is wrong with this page and why has it not been approved? Crocatoot (talk) 05:50, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , Not enough reliable sources that review or cover the game. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:45, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

06:40:59, 14 November 2019 review of submission by Olimbek zayniddinov
Please explain that my project does not fit the article Olimbek zayniddinov (talk) 06:40, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , Your article was rejected, as there was no content other than a sandbox test message, and some section headings. If you wish to write an article about Samarkand economy and service institute, you should either write an article and submit it to AFC, or ask at Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences.
 * However, to have an article, any subject requires significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. If you don't have this, please don't attempt to write an article, as it would not be possible to verify it to Wikipedia's standards.  Oxon Alex    - talk  09:28, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * However, to have an article, any subject requires significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. If you don't have this, please don't attempt to write an article, as it would not be possible to verify it to Wikipedia's standards.  Oxon Alex    - talk  09:28, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

14 November 2019 review of submission by FairlyFlatFoot
I have been working on a draft for Adrienne Haslet >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Adrianne_Haslet<<. I submitted it for review to go live, but the reviewer still believes there is not enough coverage to maker her notable enough for an article. I dont understand this, and disagree. I came across many articles in reliable sources that are completely focused on her, and are not at all passing mentions. Please see my draft and look at the many sources that support the content. If you agree that the article is not yet worthy of submission into Wikipedia, please tell me what more I need to do. And if you think this woman will never be Wiki worthy, then perhaps I should give up? Thanks so much for your help.FairlyFlatFoot (talk) 06:55, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

FairlyFlatFoot (talk) 06:55, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

09:46:53, 14 November 2019 review of submission by Olimbek zayniddinov
How do I know if this DRAFT (project: Samarkand Institute of Economics and Service) has been rejected or accepted? Olimbek zayniddinov (talk) 09:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * You should expect to wait roughly two months for a review.  JTP (talk • contribs) 15:14, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

15:35:51, 14 November 2019 review of submission by RWNYC19
Hi, I noticed you have reviewed this page and declined it again. I wonder then how we can add an English version to an already existing Hebrew Wikipedia page? Thank you. Please can you give me some more information.

RWNYC19 (talk) 15:35, 14 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The guidelines and policies that Hebrew Wikipedia has are their own and not necessarily the same as those on English Wikipedia. We can only really advise you about English Wikipedia. You would have to follow their procedures for creating articles. However, it's highly doubtful that they would accept an English version of an article. — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 15:42, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

16:34:25, 14 November 2019 review of draft by 2600:1702:1410:AA20:853C:9ED7:E2B2:2C4C
Need help submitting draft for review. Each time I try to submit for review, I am redirected to a page that directs me to press the Publish Changes button, but the button is not active.

2600:1702:1410:AA20:853C:9ED7:E2B2:2C4C (talk) 16:34, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Are you clicking the blue button which says "Submit your draft for review" ? Theroadislong (talk) 17:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I have submitted it on your behalf. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 17:50, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

18:20:28, 14 November 2019 review of submission by Wowletmebe
Draft:DK

Please review and confirm if any adjustments are necessary to make this article compliant. I believe I provided sufficient information alongside the appropriate references and the individual in question is notable.


 * I do apologise for the pasted content genuine mistake.

Please review the draft article if you have time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wowletmebe (talk • contribs) 18:47, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Captains note: The whole article was copy pasted here, I have undone that, as that not how we do things here. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 18:44, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I have submitted the draft to AfC on your behalf. Please be patient and wait for a review. The process takes an average of 8 weeks at the moment. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 18:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Can you please check the additional sources and resubmit this draft for review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wowletmebe (talk • contribs) 04:09, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

18:37:20, 14 November 2019 review of draft by TheFallenMoon
While waiting for this draft to come under eventual review, I wanted to know if there is anything I can currently do to improve it. The same applies to Draft:Name and Number EP. Thank you for any help you can supply. TheFallenMoon (talk) 18:37, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , Peters 1914 is...way too short. There is basically no information or sources. You need at least 3 reliable and independent sources that give the subject significant coverage. For Name and number, same thing: need sources. You have to prove that both meet the WP:MUSIC notability requirements. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:07, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

21:06:33, 14 November 2019 review of draft by MemeTrooper
Hello, I had submitted a draft artivle and it was declined due to not having significant coverage with reliable, secondary sources. May I please have help with knowing what a reliable secondary source is so I know what else I have to include? This is the submission https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:MediBang Thanks.MemeTrooper (talk) 21:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , Can you show me the best 5 sources you have for the article? They should be reliable, independent, and give significant coverage to the subject. Leave a note on my talk page preferably. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:47, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

MemeTrooper (talk) 21:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Request on 22:50:02, 14 November 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Tina Rosco
Article draft for creation currently being re-reviewed. The first time I submitted it, it was declined within hours. This time, it has been days. Is this normal? I know it says I may have to wait 8 weeks, I just want to know if the hours vs. days review time is normal. Thanks.

Tina Rosco (talk) 22:50, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , Howdy hello! The amount of time before a review is quite random, its somewhat unusual to get feedback within hours, so be thankful. Drafts are reviewed in no particular order, and there are about 3,000 of them waiting for review. The average wait time is 8 weeks currently, although volunteers are working hard to reduce that time. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you Captain Eek! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tina Rosco (talk • contribs) 03:47, 15 November 2019 (UTC)