Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 November 15

= November 15 =

08:16:43, 15 November 2019 review of submission by 2409:4062:19B:1D17:2933:352E:B259:61DD
2409:4062:19B:1D17:2933:352E:B259:61DD (talk) 08:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * We are WP:NOT a lyrics database. This would not be approved in its current state. Such an article needs reliable sources, and prose in English. As is, it seems purely promotional and will likely be deleted, especially as it says "Find our song", showing a clear conflict of interest. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 08:45, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

10:39:12, 15 November 2019 review of draft by 92.21.222.252
92.21.222.252 (talk) 10:39, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Please review the draft and tell me if the sources meet the notability criteria.
 * The queue is over eight weeks long. Please be patient.  JTP (talk • contribs) 15:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Sorry wrong context I am not trying to skip the queue please advise on my sources and whether they meet the notability criteria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wowletmebe (talk • contribs) 18:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

14:06:32, 15 November 2019 review of submission by Aliso4ka2013
Hello! I tried to publish my article 3 times. The main reason why the article has not yet been published is in reliable references. I think I fixed this problem by adding more references showing significant coverage. Could you kindly check the article, please? Do I need to add more references? Are there any options for the article to be reviewed earlier? Thanks in advance!

Aliso4ka2013 (talk) 14:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , Your article is in the queue and awaiting review. Please be patient, as the average review time is about 8 weeks at the moment. I'm afraid there is no way to be reviewed earlier, as that would unfair to the other people who have been waiting in the queue. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:09, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

15:50:19, 15 November 2019 review of submission by SM1844
Hello. This is my first time creating a wiki page. I kept resubmitting it after making some changes to see what exactly needed to be changed but it was a little confusing. Could I get more specific advice and examples on what needs to be fixed and how? The neutral tone requirement was my biggest issue-- I tried to be as neutral as possible so if this is still the issue could I get some help with that? Any other critiques are welcome! Thanks so much. SM1844 (talk) 15:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , As I see it, you are lacking sources. Few of the sources seem to give the subject significant coverage. The prominent collectors section is entirely unsourced and is also unencyclopedic, I suggest that it go. The external links should not be in the body, they should either go at the end, or be formalized as references. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:51, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice! I will do just that and resubmit it for review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SM1844 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

16:53:45, 15 November 2019 review of submission by Interstellarity
I am working on the sections Background and Mixed martial arts career. I found this source and am having trouble expressing this in my own words. Can you help me please? Interstellarity (talk) 16:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC) Interstellarity (talk) 16:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

19:45:10, 15 November 2019 review of submission by Jacknickels
Jacknickels (talk) 19:45, 15 November 2019 (UTC) We feel that this page should be submitted into Wikipedia
 * , Who is "we"? Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:39, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

19:55:19, 15 November 2019 review of submission by Jacknickels
Jacknickels (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC) We believe as Wisconsin Soccer Experts currently employed by USA soccer Associated, that this wikipedia article Samuel Abreu should be reinstated as a current wikipedia article. Abreu is currently up and coming in the soccer world, and is very well known with over 1 million social media followers. Thank you very much, Jack Nickels USA Soccer Associate
 * , Lotta issues here. For starters, accounts are individual use. There is no "we" behind an account. Only one person is allowed to use an account. If you have been paid by a subject, or received any form of compensation (such as being an employee of USA Soccer and were expected to make these edits in the course of your work) relating to the edits you have made, you must disclose that per WP:PAID. Furthermore, to prove notability, you need more and better sources. Coverage in newspapers, the media, etc. As is, it seems that the subject is likely not notable. There are 8 billion living people, and thus very very few are actually well known enough to be included. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:06, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

22:19:34, 15 November 2019 review of submission by Tedfmyers
Hello! Thank you for taking the time to review this article. Please forgive me if I have made any mistakes, as I am new to contributing to wikipedia and may not be aware of all the rules regarding article creation and editing.

My latest submission was rejected on the basis of WP:NCORP. I've reviewed the page on notability for corporations and organizations, and believe that it should pass these guidelines. To back up this claim, I found nine (out of the nineteen references in the latest article version) that pass the guidelines of being significant, independent, reliable, and secondary. These are the references I believe fulfill these categories:

(references 7,8,9,11,13,14,16,17, and 19 in the original article)

Please let me know if you agree with me, or if I have made any mistakes in my reasoning. It should also be noted that I have added a few references since the article was rejected.

Tedfmyers (talk) 22:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)