Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 November 18

= November 18 =

10:15:04, 18 November 2019 review of submission by Mpastorleary
Mpastorleary (talk) 10:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , This draft lacks reliable sources which prove notability. The specific criteria seems to be WP:NCORP, which requires at least 3 reliable and independent sources with significant coverage of the subject. The existing sources don't show that. But to be honest, I suspect there may not be enough sources on this subject, and you may be better served by working on another page. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

18:20:35, 18 November 2019 review of submission by 130.0.29.114
I'm the manager of Kiameti. I think now it deserve to review. Kiameti now it's famous on Shkodër AL. AND HIS RECOGNITIONS IS GROWING UP DAY BY DAY

130.0.29.114 (talk) 18:20, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * This person does not seem to have any media coverage, which means they aren't notable. Furthermore, if you this person's manager, you have a conflict of interest and must disclose that per WP:PAID. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:38, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

18:26:21, 18 November 2019 review of draft by TheoMax42651
If the article focuses more on the lawsuit vs Lt Col Sam Schism would that address the concern? Also, the information about his career were drawn from two different books that were published and his primary military records; therefore, guidance on how to reference those items would be helpful.

Thank you,

TheoMax42651 (talk) 18:26, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , More content from the lawsuit could be good. More content in general, and more sources are needed. I also recommend you use an infobox in the article, as the current way of listing awards is not at all standard. Take a look at George S. Patton (a featured article), which has an example of an excellently done infobox, as well as being a perfect guide for the shape your article should take. Clearly, you article won't be anywhere near as long, but you get the general idea. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 18:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

19:57:30, 18 November 2019 review of draft by 106.78.169.77
What more can I add to improvise this draft?
 * More sources, which give the subject significant coverage and not just passing mentions. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 18:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

22:43:57, 18 November 2019 review of draft by Wearetriumphant
Hey not sure what you want me to do here. Provided plenty of references.

Wearetriumphant (talk) 22:43, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , Wikipedia is not a reference. References must be reliable and independent sources, think news articles, books, that sort of thing. You'll need at least 3 good sources with significant coverage to ensure an article, maybe more. Also, the article needs more prose.
 * Additionally, your username implies a conflict of interest. If you are associated with the subject, you should declare that. If you have been paid or compensated by the subject in any way, you must declare that by following the guidelines at WP:PAID. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 01:56, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

23:32:10, 18 November 2019 review of submission by PapayaWiki105
I am requesting a re-review because similar production companies have Wikipedia pages which are similar to our draft, and yet we are getting rejected over and over again. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated as to what I can do to get this page approved. For your reference, I've included links to Wikipedia pages for similar production companies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_Film

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Free_Productions

Can you please tell me what I can do?

Happy to discuss via this medium or even on the phone.

Thanks, Okey

PapayaWiki105 (talk) 23:32, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , You have not followed the advice of any of the several reviewers. The issues they raised remain. Read their feedback. Change the article accordingly. If you have a question about how to implement a specific piece of feedback, please ask here. We will not re-review it until substantial changes have been made.
 * As a final note, be careful about comparing your article to existing ones. Many of the articles on WIkipedia were created before we began the rigorous Article for Creation process. That means a lot of ...honestly junk articles were created, and many of them have slipped through the cracks. You can read more about the logical fallacies involved in article comparison at WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The production company articles you linked are very, very bad, and not a good comparison. Although to be honest, I couldn't find a good production company article. The closest good one I could find was Walt Disney Animation Studios, but understand that might not be super valuable. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 02:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)