Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 November 20

= November 20 =

03:17:44, 20 November 2019 review of submission by TopBanana12
TopBanana12 (talk) 03:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , Subjects require notable coverage, that is multiple reliable and independent sources that give the subject significant coverage. This article lacks any such sources, and such sources do not seem to exist. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:55, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Request on 08:26:22, 20 November 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Helloajnabi
Helloajnabi 08:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

This page is belong to famous motivational writer and I can provide more references for the same. So I am requesting you to please do not delete this page.

08:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Sanjay Sharma08:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

09:38:19, 20 November 2019 review of submission by 194.243.213.83
Can someone help me for the publication of this page .... Vincenzo Ferdinandi was a famous designer in the 60s in Italy. There are also official news and photos attached, but this profile remains a draft. I hope for a welcome help. Thanks anyway.

194.243.213.83 (talk) 09:38, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Some cleanup needs to happen before the page can be published. Reference links to just photos should be removed, as they are not sources. Since many of the sources are just photos, you need some more sources that are actually textual. They can be Italian language, but do need to be reliable and independent of the source. I will also help you resubmit it for re-review. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

15:33:25, 20 November 2019 review of submission by DylanFaraci98
DylanFaraci98 (talk) 15:33, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , The article has been rejected as there do not seem to be enough sources in existence to justify an article. I reccomend you turn your efforts to existing articles, such as may be found at WikiProject Rugby Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:59, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

15:53:20, 20 November 2019 review of submission by SM1844
Hello. I've taken your advice and made the suggested edits. How can I resubmit for review? I don't see the resubmission button. Thank you. SM1844 (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , Your draft has been rejected as it is not notable. I do not see enough improvement, and note that much of the article remains unsourced. I rejected it outright as I do not believe enough sources exist to give this person an article. If you can find more sources and change my mind, do. But I recommend you turn your efforts to improving existing articles about other topics you are interested in. Creating articles from scratch is very difficult, and requires a good grasp of Wikipedia, which can be gained by editing in other areas. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

18:25:58, 20 November 2019 review of submission by Trannguyent
This draft was rejected recently. I am hoping for some help pinpointing exactly on which section/aspect I should focus my efforts to increase the chances of it being accepted. I recognize some of the formatting mistakes, and I would like to know how I can improve the content. Thank you for any help.

These are the comments left by the reviewer: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Trannguyent (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , Wikipedia is not a resume. The content should be presented from a neutral point of view, and like an encyclopedia article. Better sources are also needed. The subjects website, and any sources close to her, should not be used. I also suggest that you read the notability guidelines for academics, which will inform you what information you'll need to prove an article on her is warranted. As is, I do not see how she meets those guidelines. She may still be too early in her career to warrant a page. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

19:56:46, 20 November 2019 review of draft by MVaughanK
The Widener University School of Law wikipedia page is incorrect and misleading. The Widener University School of Law no longer exists. It split apart in 2015 into Widener University Commonwealth Law School and Widener University Delaware Law School. Since the schools are separate and distinct they should each have their own wikipedia page just like Penn State Law and Penn State Dickinson Law School when they split in 2014. The current Widener University School of Law wikipedia page is confusing to the reader and presents incorrect information. How do I go about creating new wikipedia entries for the two separate law schools? When I submitted the one for Commonwealth Law School it was denied because it said it was a duplicate entry. I would also like to create a new wikipedia page for the Delaware Law School.

MVaughanK (talk) 19:56, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , I have created the article for you. Please work to clean up the existing Widener University School of Law article to reflect the fact that there is now a distinct article. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:17, 21 November 2019 (UTC)