Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 November 25

= November 25 =

08:28:37, 25 November 2019 review of submission by RanaJapan
RanaJapan (talk) 08:28, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

09:05:08, 25 November 2019 review of submission by Aliso4ka2013
Hello! Why my article has been rejected? I added more trustful references and did't understand the comment that it's a promotional page. What I can do for improve my article? Thank you! Aliso4ka2013 (talk) 09:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The article as it currently stands really reads like a resume. As it was declined multiple times for the same reason without improvements, it was rejected. Maybe reading WP:ARTSPAM and WP:NPOV may help in cleaning up the article. Best, Taewangkorea (talk) 20:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

11:15:54, 25 November 2019 review of submission by DiplomatTesterMan
A user messed up the draft and removed cites after which the draft was rejected it. I didn't see this in time. Please could the article be reviewed again; i have manually reverted it back to what it was. If it still bad and doesnt pass AFC then nevermind. Thanks. DTM (talk) 11:15, 25 November 2019 (UTC) DTM (talk) 11:15, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

12:26:37, 25 November 2019 review of submission by Mirjami Kuusela
Mirjami Kuusela (talk) 12:26, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

15:28:43, 25 November 2019 review of submission by MarcoLaudato
Hello :)

I have amended the draft according to the reviews. In particular I have added two secondary sources (from European Mathematical Society) and I have removed the mission statement section. Moreover, I have eliminated all the external links in the draft body. Please, let me know if now it is acceptable!

Kind regards, Marco

MarcoLaudato (talk) 15:28, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

17:33:33, 25 November 2019 review of draft by Tonyswan18
Hi, Today I got message that my substitution was declined due to lack of reliable sources. I tried to support all facts that I used in my article. But if it's not enough, could you please give me to know what exactly parts of my article I need to support by reliable sources? I hope it will help to improve my draft. Thank you, Tony Tonyswan18 (talk) 17:33, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

19:34:43, 25 November 2019 review of submission by TDuVal
This is not a press release. It is an article on a company of interest that includes the history of the creation of a patent-pending system. This is notable, as evidenced by the articles in 401(k) Specialist Magazine, Entrepreneur, Forbes, etc. This article is similar in tone and construction to the article on Acorns, which is in the same industry. I would welcome constructive advice on how to make the article more befitting for inclusion in Wikipedia. TDuVal (talk) 19:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

21:06:01, 25 November 2019 review of submission by Jeremiah Editorial Lee
This is a major landmark and tourist destination in Helsinki, Finland. Smaller Ferris wheels are listed on List of Ferris wheels

Jeremiah Editorial Lee (talk) 21:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The rejection reason provides a link to the relevant guideline. None of the sources in the draft meet the requirement set out by WP:GNG. Wikipedia articles are not based on popularity, but in-depth sourcing. Similarly, articles are not created based on other articles, but only on their own sources. — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 21:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

21:44:12, 25 November 2019 review of submission by JohnGabrielRulz
I want my submission to be reconsidered. I'd like this entry to be part wedding reception gift for my good friend, next January. After that it can be denied or taken down. I'd appreciate your help on this matter.

Thank you,

D.R. JohnGabrielRulz (talk) 21:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * That isn't what Wikipedia is for. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 21:51, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

22:09:50, 25 November 2019 review of submission by Jeremiah Editorial Lee
I have added media coverage from Sweden, the UK, and the United States about the opening of this landmark. It is a symbol for Helsinki. Search for Helsinki skyline and you will see so.

Jeremiah Editorial Lee (talk) 22:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ based on additional references provided. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:46, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

22:49:47, 25 November 2019 review of submission by Wikiabc123wiki
I have asked for a re-review but have not received one for a long time, and the page is still waiting for the re-review. The rejection of the publication was due to the absence of citations, and as can be seen, many notable sources have been added for every fact stated. Thank you and hoping to receive a re-review soon! Wikiabc123wiki (talk) 22:49, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

22:55:54, 25 November 2019 review of submission by Wikiabc123wiki
Hello! I wrote a short article on the Inan Family of Turkey ( a very wealthy family associated with construction and real estate as their business) and it has been rejected due to the absence of sources. I have added many notable sources now, but have not recieved a re-review for a long time and still did not have one. Could you please make sure it gets re-reviewed as the family's company is one of the biggest construction companies in Turkey. Thank you very much! Wikiabc123wiki (talk) 22:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , The subject is not notable. I suggest you focus on editing already existing pages. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)