Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 October 10

= October 10 =

07:18:43, 10 October 2019 review of draft by Sumaiya.mobility
I have submitted an article in the month of August 2019. It got declined saying that the language was not proper. I edited and resubmitted for review in the few days span. Till now I haven't received any update on my article. Is there a way to know how to improve my content so that it gets accepted faster? Apart from that, is there a way to know the current status of my article (if someone is actually reviewing it or if I need to work on it again so that it matches the level and gets approved)? Thanks in advance.

Sumaiya.mobility (talk) 07:18, 10 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi . Some reviewers concentrate on recent submissions that can be disposed of quickly, which may explain the initial quick decline. The draft was resubmitted 5 weeks ago. The current backlog is 4-5 months, so you can anticipate another review by the middle of January. Most businesses are not notable (not suitable for inclusion - the second reason it was initially declined), so the draft may never be accepted. You may find WP:BFAQ informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:42, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

08:26:22, 10 October 2019 review of submission by Gerard-Odonovan
I requesting a re-review because I made some changes to the page context. I wanted this biography to be live in wikipedia.

Gerard-Odonovan (talk) 08:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * No reliable sources, and the topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 11:20, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

10:47:21, 10 October 2019 review of submission by CheatCodes4ever
I think you should accept this. I just wanna be part of Wikipedia and be a good editor. You should be helping pages get fixed, not deleting them because they are not perfect. I want you to, instead of doing this, help me with this page. I hope you understand this. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 10:47, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Your drafts have no sources, let alone in-depth reliable ones, the subjects are not notable enough for articles so they have been rejected or declined as appropriate. Theroadislong (talk) 11:18, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

15:50:54, 10 October 2019 review of submission by Alexander Andronkin
Alexander Andronkin (talk) 15:50, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

15:55:42, 10 October 2019 review of submission by Alexander Andronkin
I supplemented the article about SSLS company and now the article looks much better. Alexander Andronkin (talk) 15:55, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * It is just an advert with one source, their own website. Theroadislong (talk) 16:02, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

16:40:12, 10 October 2019 review of submission by 2402:8100:3986:4C77:F84F:F3C9:F905:EAD7
2402:8100:3986:4C77:F84F:F3C9:F905:EAD7 (talk) 16:40, 10 October 2019 (UTC)