Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 September 11

= September 11 =

10:17:13, 11 September 2019 review of submission by UseTheWiki
Hey, Any tips for making this article better? I believe I have found enough citations. I am still learning the ropes of writing new articles. UseTheWiki (talk) 10:17, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The draft has been rejected, he is not notable in Wikipedia terms, IMDb and Soundcloud are not reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:08, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

14:49:17, 11 September 2019 review of draft by Tonyswan18
Hi, I tried to post the article "DoULike", but it was declined because it looks like an advertisement. So now, I would like to know what exactly seems in my text like advertisement. I'd like to improve it, but don't know in what way. I tried to use only facts and all reference sources that I have. Maybe you could help me and focus on what I need to change or in what parts I need to use additional references. Thanks, Tony

Tonyswan18 (talk) 14:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * "ALL aspects of the draft read like an advert, "targeting the needs of a multi-national audience" "the platform became more popular" "model is dependent on several essentials: advertisement featured on the website and premium subscriptions on top of the free usage model." "present in social media: Facebook, Twitter and Instagram"etc,etc. etc. Theroadislong (talk) 15:05, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

16:29:50, 11 September 2019 review of submission by Abhayjaxen73
Abhayjaxen73 (talk) 16:29, 11 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Assuming this formatted properly, it still wouldn't be a suitable encyclopedic article. If nothing else, because it doesn't assert a reason as to why you are notable (by wiki standards, that is). It would also need multiple reliable, independent, secondary sources. Please have a read of why we discourage autobiographies. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:40, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

17:21:51, 11 September 2019 review of submission by Neelpurohit19
Hey,

I think my page should be allowed to be on wikipedia as I am a very notable person (not famous) but notable in Dubai, especially amongst all the schools. I have 1400 instagram followers which doesn't sound like alot but all of them are mainly from Dubai and the school students all know me. I think I should have this page even if it is for a short amount of time as I am doing it for a school project + personal interest.

Please do allow it.

Neelpurohit19 (talk) 17:21, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

17:23:22, 11 September 2019 review of submission by Akpodeyoh
Akpodeyoh (talk) 17:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * 22:40, 11 September 2019 SuperMarioMan talk contribs deleted page Draft:Isaiah O. (G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban) (thank) - go on, nothing more to see here. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 14:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I have written up a draft for artist Laurent Dareau and have submitted it under the article wizard. My question is what is my next step to get the post approved and published? Thank you
draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Laurent_Dareau

18:42:57, 11 September 2019 review of submission by Dareaujulia
Draft:Laurent Dareau

JD 18:42, 11 September 2019 (UTC)


 * - hi there. What in particular can we help you with? Nosebagbear (talk) 21:43, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * On your behalf I've submitted the draft for review. There is a huge backlog, so it may be five months before it is reviewed. You may continue improving it while you wait, or see Community portal for other ways to help improve Wikipedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:41, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

18:59:14, 11 September 2019 review of draft by Wcg98
The page created provides more detail on the product CodeSonar mentioned on the GrammaTech page. Other static analysis products such as Polyspace, Coverity, Klocwork have similar pages. In fact, the page List of tools for static code analysis includes CodeSonar yet the link to the product is conspicuous by its absence.

What else is needed to prove this product is "notable."

Wcg98 (talk) 18:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)


 * - currently there is only one reliable, independent, secondary source - it needs at least 2 and preferably 3. While it's worth reading WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS which shows why the existence of one article doesn't support another, however those articles do include more suitable sources. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:40, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

21:46:23, 11 September 2019 review of submission by Namrathacivil
Hi recently my article civil engineering systems was declined saying the content matched civil engineering, although it is a lesser known fact that civil engineering systems is different. Namrathacivil (talk) 21:46, 11 September 2019 (UTC)