Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 September 20

= September 20 =

00:06:30, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Talkfir
hi, i wanted to know, why u declined my page psybient, and psychill? lot of people dont know this, so i want that it will be exist, so they can learn more... thanks tal

Talkfir (talk) 00:06, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . Draft:Psybient was declined because it is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The encyclopedia is not the place to "get the word out" about anything. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

06:15:14, 20 September 2019 review of draft by Tonysy191
Hi! Good day!

I would like to ask for more information or help, so that I can publish this draft of mine? Your feedback will be gladly appreciated.

Thank you!

Tonysy191 (talk) 06:15, 20 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you for submitting the draft. Unfortunately, it was declined as the draft in its current state does not cite any reliable sources (WP:RS), and so fails the general notability guidelines. Perhaps WP:GNG and WP:NCORP will help. Taewangkorea (talk) 02:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

07:48:50, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Dickel1
I want to make edits on the article in order to respect Wikipedia terms and conditions. This was my first time posting an article and I was still not comfortable with the referencing part. I want to try again.

Could you please let me do the required edits?

Thank you Dickel1 (talk) 07:48, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

10:32:28, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre
Hello Team,

As suggested by the team, we have made a few changes by adding some strong and reliable source of reference articles in the draft. I request the team to go through the updated draft and let us know your view on it.

Thank You! Chirag-Behre (talk) 10:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Who is "we', Wikipedia accounts are strictly for single person use, please declare any conflict of interest. Theroadislong (talk) 10:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

14:58:03, 20 September 2019 review of submission by MS KHAN K
MS KHAN K (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a venue for hosting your CV I'm afraid (like most of us) you are not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 15:48, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

16:11:46, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Bharat1
On what basis we have this article created: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumbini_Gardens

Bharat1 (talk) 16:11, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

16:42:05, 20 September 2019 review of draft by Francis schichtel
Dear Wikipedia:

This wikipedia entry has been waiting to be posted for many more than 8 weeks. Is there some problem? Is there anything I can do to speed up this process?

Thank you Francis

Francis schichtel (talk) 16:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . The draft has been in the pool to be reviewed for 4 months, but the current backlog is 5 months. You may continue to improve it while you wait. I notice that it cites Goodreads and the Daily Mail, neither of which is a reliable source. Removing or replacing those sources would be a good start. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:38, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

18:47:36, 20 September 2019 review of draft by Kenpj
My project has been reviewed once. When will it be approved?

Kenpj (talk) 18:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)


 * - this specific draft doesn't seem to have been reviewed before. In any case, it was submitted at the beginning of july - about 11 weeks ago. There are drafts 6 weeks older, as the submission rate is so much higher than it was last year. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

19:44:38, 20 September 2019 review of draft by Harrylangham
I want to know whether my article on Jean Jones has been submitted for review. Harrylangham (talk) 19:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No it hasn't... you need to click the blue box that says "Submit your draft for review". Theroadislong (talk) 21:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

23:31:25, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Wikicraigbez
Hi, I made changes to address all of the reviewer comments and thought I resubmitted for a re-review. This is my first article so I'm not familiar with the system. It's not clear to me what state the article is in. Is it in the queue to re-review or do I need to do something else to get that to happen? Thanks. - Craig Wikicraigbez (talk) 23:31, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No, it's not in any queue right now. I could tell you how to resubmit it, but first I want to ask on what he thinks and if his plan was really to reject the draft, because this looks rather like a decline reason. @Dan arndt if your intention was indeed to decline, it looks like an odd bug in the script for me. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:08, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , you are correct in your assumption- it wasn’t my intention to reject the draft but simply to decline it. Unfortunately there is/was a bug in the assessment script. Happy for the draft to be resubmitted if the issues about notability have been addressed. Dan arndt (talk) 05:15, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I have changed the template so that it looks and works like it was intended. @Wikicraigbez If you think the draft is ready for re-review, there is a blue "Resubmit" button. Yust click it. The rest you should already know. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)