Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 April 20

= April 20 =

09:26:23, 20 April 2020 review of submission by 2A01:4B00:E40D:4000:ACEA:385F:12FF:10C4
I am requesting a re-review because I have made the required changes that I understand needed to be implemented. I have ensured that all information is factual and not promotional. 2A01:4B00:E40D:4000:ACEA:385F:12FF:10C4 (talk) 09:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * You seem to have ignored DGG's advice, which was to not resubmit. Unfortunately nothing substantial has changed: this is a promotional profile for a non-notable individual. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 11:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

09:46:30, 20 April 2020 review of submission by Sworrubt
I've been advised that this article isn't notable, but the eight other departments in the Faculty of Science and Engineering at The University of Manchester have Wikipedia articles - this is the only one without one.

Sworrubt (talk) 09:46, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , Please see WP:INN Sulfurboy (talk) 02:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

12:27:00, 20 April 2020 review of draft by WikiMacaroons
I'd like help with improving this page. It was the second I created and the second to be rejected for one reason or another. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bill_Stickers_is_innocent

WikiMacaroons (talk) 12:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , What did you need help with? Sulfurboy (talk) 15:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Sulfurboy I was told my article perhaps did not qualify for Wikipedia due to the cites. What do you think? WikiMacaroons (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , You only have one source and it's an entry on a phrase dictionary. That isn't enough to pass any of our notability guidelines. I would recommend reviewing the links in the decline message that Kylie already provided on the draft page. Sulfurboy (talk) 17:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Sulfurboy Thanks for your guidance. Do I send you a barnstar? Sorry I'm a bit of a newbie, only like a hundred edits WikiMacaroons (talk) 11:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

14:59:07, 20 April 2020 review of submission by 106.204.207.43
106.204.207.43 (talk) 14:59, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Did you have a question? Sulfurboy (talk) 15:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

15:26:44, 20 April 2020 review of submission by Muneer19
Muneer19 (talk) 15:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

can i know why is it rejected i can i first looked his all the documents and then i started to make this page he has his page on instgram also namely as mb_enterprises_ you can ask him for documents or details so can you please help me in making this page

17:13:26, 20 April 2020 review of submission by Rohitmadanjha
Rohitmadanjha (talk) 17:13, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * It includes a lovely photograph (probably not copyright free though), the subject is not shown to be notable. Facebook is never a reliable source and cannot be used to establish notability and Wikipedia only has articles about notable topics that have been reported on in depth by multiple, independent reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 17:34, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

17:14:06, 20 April 2020 review of submission by Rohitmadanjha
Rohitmadanjha (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , Did you have a question? Sulfurboy (talk) 02:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

19:32:26, 20 April 2020 review of submission by MissRight44
While creating this article I looked up that article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Esports_Federation, it has less appropriate references than I added to my work. And I am really annoyed with the fact that my work was rejected. Don't you consider "The Herald" as a good news source? Please, give me some advice, so I can have my article published. I have proofs-articles from such websides: The Herald, The Chronicle, Pindula, Zimbabwe News. I'm looking forward for hearing from you!

MissRight44 (talk) 19:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , It is abundantly clear that you did not read the linked policies that were provided six or seven times over. If you had, you would have learned that The Herald article would be considered WP:ROUTINE coverage. The article has been rejected which means it will not be considered further. I would recommend going forward that you edit pages of existing articles that may interest you as to familiarize yourself with our processes, as creating new pages is one of the most difficult tasks you can do on Wikipedia. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:30, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

20:50:19, 20 April 2020 review of draft by 151.20.130.162
Hi, why this page has been rejected? Thanks

151.20.130.162 (talk) 20:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The reviewer left a decline message on the page itself, are you able to see that? Did you have a specific question about those linked policies? Sulfurboy (talk) 02:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

23:56:32, 20 April 2020 review of submission by Gkatt655
Gkatt655 (talk) 23:56, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

So I delete it myself or let you do it?
 * An admin will come along and delete it shortly. Going forward I would recommend editing already existing articles about topics that interest you. Creating new pages is a very difficult task. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:25, 21 April 2020 (UTC)