Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 April 30

= April 30 =

00:17:05, 30 April 2020 review of submission by Dynamiccloser
I have taken out all personal promo verbiage from the article. Dynamiccloser (talk) 00:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi . I have removed the violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, and some of the material for which no reliable source is cited. There isn't much left. Valdes does not appear to be notable (suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). --Worldbruce (talk) 13:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

00:19:19, 30 April 2020 review of submission by Dynamiccloser
I have remove all person and promotional language from the article Dynamiccloser (talk) 00:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , For starters, it is unsourced. That won't fly. But, the guy just doesn't seem to be notable anyway. He's an average individual like you or I. If he was notable for his crimes, then we probably shouldn't cover him unless the crimes were really somethinge else, see WP:BLPCRIME, which they don't seem to be. Its time to edit another subject, perhaps one that exists already. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

02:44:35, 30 April 2020 review of submission by Mattyrobson
I am requesting assistance because I am trying to give wikipedia updates on the TV show, My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic. My article somehow got deleted, even though I added some sources to this information. I would like you to give me help on how to not only get the deleted page back, but also manage to put the information where it tells what I found, and convince them that a 10th season of the show really IS happening. Mattyrobson (talk) 02:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , Well you'll need to find some reliable sources that claim there is a 10th season. But as many folks have told you, no such sources currently exist. There isn't a tenth season happening. I would change my mind if you gave me an article in a reliable newspaper or website that says there is a tenth season. Unless you provide such sources, you are on a fools quest, as there is no way that article will get approved. Wikipedia relies soley on such sources, and accepts no other form of information. Based on this edit by you, I think you've simply misintrepeted what the extra episodes are. They seem to be merely a bonus, not actually a whole season. Also, if your source is the FIM Wiki, that isn't reliable, just as Wikipedia is not a reliable source, because its content is user generated.  CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

08:14:41, 30 April 2020 review of draft by Brian.mcdonald01
The reason give for rejection of the submission was that it didnt have a compatible licence. The source material does have a compatible licence, please see https://cccmcluster.org/legal How do I resubmit the article with the above evidence? Many thanks for your help.

Brian.mcdonald01 (talk) 08:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , we don't permit non commercial licenses here. As the encyclopedia itself is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike, we can't have any licensed content here more restrictive than that, so don't permit non commercial or no derivatives licenses here.  Alex Noble / 1-2 / TRB  12:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

08:38:14, 30 April 2020 review of submission by Brandonbibby
Brandonbibby (talk) 08:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , films don't have articles here until filming has commenced. See WP:NFF. You have been told this several times. You have also been told that if you continue a discussion as to a topic ban may occur.
 * Please stop trying to move this article.  Alex Noble / 1-2 / TRB  13:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Please stop trying to move this article.  Alex Noble / 1-2 / TRB  13:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

12:22:16, 30 April 2020 review of submission by 2A01:4B00:8710:9E00:18AB:6DBC:BAB8:4F1B
2A01:4B00:8710:9E00:18AB:6DBC:BAB8:4F1B (talk) 12:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

12:38:49, 30 April 2020 review of submission by Startupfortune
Startupfortune (talk) 12:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , Wikipedia is not for promotion. If you want to promote yourself or someone you know, contact an ad agency. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

12:44:59, 30 April 2020 review of submission by 49.36.131.174
49.36.131.174 (talk) 12:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)


 * - with no sources, this draft is automatically unable to demonstrate notability. The content of it indicates that it is probably impossible to do so, even if all sourcing that is available was added. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

16:05:41, 30 April 2020 review of draft by GoldenEar13
I'm just wondering how to differentiate the sidebar and the discography sections in an article I'd like to publish.

GoldenEar13 (talk) 16:05, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * using the wikitext editor, you can add section titles by adding 3 equals signs around your title, and subtitles by adding 4 equals signs.
 * On the visual editor, click on paragraph, and then you can select the different types of headings.
 * Thanks,
 * Alex Noble / 1-2 / TRB 20:05, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks,
 * Alex Noble / 1-2 / TRB 20:05, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

16:42:38, 30 April 2020 review of draft by Sbarclay000
I would like to delete my draft "Adam Eli" which was rejected for publishing. How do I do that? Right now it's publicly searchable :-(

Sbarclay000 (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , I've tagged it for deletion, however, drafts should be found easily - there aren't set to be indexed by search engines, and unless you are looking for drafts, it isn't easy to find them via Wikipedia's search.  Alex Noble / 1-2 / TRB  20:03, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Request on 16:57:34, 30 April 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Naomisargeant
I have entered this page as a friend for a living bio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Fahad_Badar

It was live but then removed with wikipedia citing that it has been removed for violation. This is the exact message: This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require clean-up to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

This is not the case and I need to know how to resolve this matter, awaiting your kind asistance.

Naomisargeant (talk) 16:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * While I cannot reveal what I know publicly, there is indeed reason to believe that you have been paid to edit. If this is not the case, you will need to offer a plausible explanation as to why others might think that you were paid, if you were not paid. 331dot (talk) 17:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

17:26:03, 30 April 2020 review of submission by Realquacktaped
Hello, I hope someone sees this. Just yesterday I attempted to create a page for a company specializes in making a Japanese toy called a kendama. My page was promptly declined with a message that said Wickepedia does not allow advertisements (or something along those lines). I am I no way associated with the company and had no intention to use that page as an advertisement. I simply passionate kendama enthusiast who wants to create a brief articles for different kendama companies with a short history of each one to add to the knowledge of wikipedia. It doesn't make much since to me why restaurants are able to have wikipedia pages but not kendama companies. If someone could either help me approve my page or further explain why that page can not exist I would very much appreciate it. Thank you!

Realquacktaped (talk) 17:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Your draft does little more than tell about the company; that's why it was considered to be an advertisement. Wikipedia articles should do more, they should summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about the company, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company.(please review)  You may find it helpful to read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 17:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

17:49:32, 30 April 2020 review of draft by Jadelsb1
Why is Spotify not considered a reliable source? Jadelsb1 (talk) 17:49, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't think the issue is whether or not Spotify is a reliable source, it's that your draft in general does not have enough independent reliable sources with significant coverage, showing how Oskar meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable musician. 331dot (talk) 17:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

I'm confused about why the page was rejected. Griffin is a well known producer who is featured a such on the page entitled "Boomiverse". Jadelsb1 (talk) 19:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Please make further replies or follow up comments in this same section, instead of creating a new section. As I said, your draft in general does not have enough independent reliable sources with significant coverage.  If he meets the Wikipedia definition of either a notable musician or a notable creative professional(producer), that's only one step- Oskar must have significant coverage in independent reliable sources.  If no reliable sources write about him, he would not merit an article at this time. 331dot (talk) 20:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

I just added 3 reliable sources to his page. Am I missing anything else @331dot? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadelsb1 (talk • contribs) 22:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I see that you added three links, if these are sources, you need to properly cite the information the sources are supporting; please see this page to learn about citing sources. 331dot (talk) 07:31, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

I just properly cited them. Please let me know if there is anything else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadelsb1 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

18:53:19, 30 April 2020 review of draft by Mrn helmers
Can someone here please take a closer look at Draft:Bruce Flatt? The draft was recently rejected because of a lack of significant coverage. But there is plenty of significant coverage cited: a New York Times profile, a Globe and Mail profile, a Bloomberg Businessweek profile, Financial Times and more. These are long articles all about Bruce Flatt - not interviews or trivial mentions - from some of the most reliable and prominent news outlets in the world. Pinging, who edited the draft extensively last month and is not, as far as I know, affiliated with Brookfield as I am. Thank you, Mrn helmers (talk) 18:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Mrn helmers (talk) 18:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , Its rare that we would approve these articles, but there is certainly significant coverage. As a note of caution, since you have a COI, you should not make any direct edits to the page in the future. Any such edits should be proposed on the talkpage instead. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

21:06:16, 30 April 2020 review of submission by WhiteStone98
WhiteStone98 (talk) 21:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , This seems to be an average person like you or I. She could be notable someday, but shes not there yet. If you are this person or know her, you probably shouldn't be writing about her anyway. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for taking the time to take a look at my article. I'd like to improve it and hopefully have it published. Do you have any recommendations on what information I could add, or any specific sources I could draw from to deem this artist notable? Thank you.

21:37:24, 30 April 2020 review of submission by QuincyBalius
Hello! I submitted a draft for review and was told that it appeared to be written to praise the subject, which was unintentional. The draft was for Mike Clark. Please let me know how to improve this.

QuincyBalius (talk) 21:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , Please understand that the tone of an encyclopedia is very formal. We write about subjects from a neutral and ...almost uninterested point of view. We state facts, without the traditional cruft of news articles or books. For example, "during his fifty-year-long career" is an unnecessary detail which is just trying to make him look more important. Same goes for "He was one of the first in his family to go to college", "Within a few years," and many others. In general, I would go through the article and rewrite in as neutral a tone as possible. If you need further help, please ask again. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

22:12:08, 30 April 2020 review of submission by Halliegrace
Hi, I've worked super hard to make this page devoid of any blatant advertising or promotional language and just have it represent the history of the company Bounteous. I'm not sure why it's still be rejected as too marketing-centric. Please tell me what needs to be removed to get this published.

Halliegrace (talk) 22:12, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The draft just tells about the company; Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. You offer a lot of sources, but they all appear to be press releases, routine business announcements, or brief mentions, none of which establish notability. Wikipedia is primarily interested in sources with significant coverage, coverage that goes beyond merely stating something about the company  Please see Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 22:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Request on 22:21:56, 30 April 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Per W
I have three references that it won the Jukola relay, which presumes that it is notable. What more should I add? Should I look for more newspaper articles about the same?

Per W (talk) 22:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , Hmmm it does appear to be notable based on the criteria. You'll have to forgive us, orienteering is pretty obscure, and your article is very short. I would try to add some more sources and content to the article. It might also benefit from some slight translation or context, as half of the words are non-english. I have no clue what a "by Hiidenkiertäjät" is, nor would I know that Uusimaa was in finland unless it said so in the text. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)