Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 April 5

= April 5 =

00:07:04, 5 April 2020 review of submission by Adam Naa
Adam Naa (talk) 00:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Adam Naa, see the comment I left before (I'm pasting here for transparency): if you're asking why your article was rejected as not notable, please provide three sources you think prove that the company complies with WP:GNG. Sam-2727 (talk) 14:45, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

15:28:19, 5 April 2020 review of draft by Whirly12
Whirly12 (talk) 15:28, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

This is my first submission so I'm not familiar with the shorthand and can't seem to find anything that tells me what they mean. My review feedback was "Adv,Bio." Hoping you can point me to a page that will help me understand what those mean. Thanks
 * I'm guessing they stand for blatant advertising and non notable biography? Theroadislong (talk) 20:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

16:43:12, 5 April 2020 review of submission by Aakashsingh1999
Can You give me some advice on how can I tackle the problem as I am new to Wikipedia article writing?

The Page is about the Privately Held Company in India which provides many services to the customers and also is currently developing many new products in their R&D, They make students do the development work so students can learn new things. They Conducted like soo many workshops, webinars in different colleges across the country providing students to learn new skills.

Aakashsingh1999 (talk) 16:43, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

16:57:28, 5 April 2020 review of submission by Ara.ahmad.na
Ara.ahmad.na (talk) 16:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * For the archive: 23:38, 5 April 2020 Dreamy Jazz talk contribs blocked Ara.ahmad.na talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ahmadarana. Also promotional editing.). Victor Schmidt (talk) 09:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

16:58:44, 5 April 2020 review of submission by Bojan PLOJ
You said that I need secundary souce. I have many invited talks (for example at IBM Research, Zurich, at EPFL in Lozana) I was also invited speaker at IBM Unconference 2018 in Zurich. Is this primary or secondary source. Bojan PLOJ (talk) 16:58, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Talks by you aren't secondary sources (assuming you have a close connection to the subject). Look for review articles or articles by people besides you to include in the article that mention the subject of the article significantly. Also don't state opinion as fact, as you did with the phrase "has many advantages." Sam-2727 (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

17:04:42, 5 April 2020 review of submission by Aakashsingh1999
May I know what kind of sources I need here? Aakashsingh1999 (talk) 17:04, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Independent and in-depth. Not routine listings or press releases. Theroadislong (talk) 17:06, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

20:07:37, 5 April 2020 review of submission by Mushupechkar
i want to make article on wikipedia and this official article and when this article will succeed i will help others to make articles and editing this is my first article

Mushupechkar (talk) 20:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Writing about yourself is never recommended and not a good idea. Any article has to follow the Golden Rule. Are you notable? . If you are, then someone will eventually write about you. You shouldn't. -- Alexf(talk) 20:14, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

20:14:53, 5 April 2020 review of submission by Mushupechkar
Mushupechkar (talk) 20:14, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Assuming this is about User:Mushupechkar/sandbox, please do not write about youself. Please note that an Wikipedia article is not nesessarely desireable. Based on the Birthdate there you might also want to have a look at Advice for younger editors. All things you publish on the internet are pretty much accessible for everyone, and its nearly impossible to get things out of the internet once there in there. Please understand that unlike other websites like Facebook, Instagramm or Twitter, Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia (read that article to find out more). If your only purpose is to publish an article about youself, please consider alternative outlets. I see you have been blocked for a week, I suggest you use that time to familarise yourself with the Rules, including, but not limited to WP:5P WP:NOT and WP:V. Victor Schmidt (talk) 09:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

20:24:41, 5 April 2020 review of submission by Dugro
My article Draft:Anal_torture is pending for review since 2 months. I know even older articles are pending for review, but my article is on an unconventional topic, so I fear it can be overlooked by reviewers. It has all the required citations, so pls review it. Dugro (talk) 20:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , It will be reviewed when someone gets a chance to. Us giving undue weight to review yours now would not be fair to others that have been waiting longer. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:52, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

23:54:55, 5 April 2020 review of submission by XA45Y3$
Hello, i request a re-review because I think the article is helpful for people searching about RMJS. It's easier to find the information they need when seeing all of it on Wikipedia.

Have a great day. XA45Y3$ (talk) 23:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Your draft has been rejected, meaning that there is little chance it can be improved to meet standards. Wikipedia is not for merely providing information, even if helpful; Wikipedia only summarizes what independent reliable sources state about article subjects that meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability. Please read Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 01:23, 6 April 2020 (UTC)