Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 December 13

= December 13 =

01:58:26, 13 December 2020 review of draft by XY04
Looking to get this draft reviewed for publishing. Made additional contributions since the original July submission and would like it to be reviewed again. Is there a way to improve the article?

XY04 (talk) 01:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The first suggestion would be to establish which of our notability criteria she meets. WP:GNG, which is not yet demonstrated, or WP:NACTOR, which is not yet demonstrated. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

03:41:12, 13 December 2020 review of submission by 70.114.31.252
70.114.31.252 (talk) 03:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * You didn’t ask a question but your draft has been rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. Eternal Shadow   Talk  20:59, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

03:56:13, 13 December 2020 review of draft by Nohajack
Nohajack (talk) 03:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I've fixed the problems on citations for you. You had relied exclusively on the Constitution of Kuwait, which is a primary source. I have formatted it correctly, and added two reliable secondary sources. I also added some content. I left one sentence of yours, which has claims I cannot verify. Please see and address them. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 06:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

05:30:15, 13 December 2020 review of draft by Solvz
I am not sure about inline citations, i read the article on what it is but still didn't understand. My draft got rejected because of not having citations, can anyone help me?

Solvz (talk) 05:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)


 * , I've left an example for you at the end of your first line. That said, I think the more serious hurdle for you is establishing that Aathira Rajeev is notable (see WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR). I don't think she meets the requirements of either. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 06:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

19:05:05, 13 December 2020 review of submission by SageLavineWRB
Hello, thank you for your review. Can you please advise which areas of my article need more credible links? Also is there specific wording that comes across as promotion that I can remove/change?

SageLavineWRB (talk) 19:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Your draft was rejected, meaning there is nothing you can do, Wikipedia isn't a venue for self promotion. Theroadislong (talk) 19:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

22:40:00, 13 December 2020 review of draft by ChannelSpider
I have submitted Draft:Unleashed (TV series) a month ago. I have received only a comment after that. I know reviewing takes a while but it's a bit too long for a new extended confirmed user. ChannelSpider (talk) 22:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

ChannelSpider (talk) 22:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * As noted on your draft, "This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,449 pending submissions waiting for review." Reviews are conducted by a limited number of volunteers, who do what they can when they can, and in no particular order. Your user rights level is not relevant. You will need to be patient. You are, if you are extended confirmed, able to move the draft to mainspace yourself, but you run the risk of not having others look at it first. It would be  assumed you know what you are doing, and if errors are found, they will be treated more harshly. 331dot (talk) 23:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)