Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 December 27

= December 27 =

00:19:52, 27 December 2020 review of submission by Textor Alector
Inclusion of 2 new independent reliable sources that comment on the article subject directly.

Textor Alector (talk) 00:19, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 2 new? ✅
 * independent?
 * reliable? ❌
 * Random blogs do not meet WP:UGC. And I can't even tell what devex.com does, but it is not a reliable mainstream news source or similar that has a clear editorial oversight. I don't know what one has to do to have a profile posted there, but their "advertise with us" button makes me think it's not that hard to do. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Random blogs do not meet WP:UGC. And I can't even tell what devex.com does, but it is not a reliable mainstream news source or similar that has a clear editorial oversight. I don't know what one has to do to have a profile posted there, but their "advertise with us" button makes me think it's not that hard to do. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

04:38:59, 27 December 2020 review of draft by Lindonlulgjuraj
Hello, Why am I getting this message on my wikipedia submission that states "Warning: This page should probably be moved to the Draft namespace." What do I do or call the draft?

Lindonlulgjuraj (talk) 04:38, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

07:31:52, 27 December 2020 review of draft by Shivsa008
Can anyone tell me which club come under notability in Indian football

Shivsa008 (talk) 07:31, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * See WP:NFOOTY and WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs) 🎄  16:43, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

07:38:49, 27 December 2020 review of submission by Montazeris31
Montazeris31 (talk) 07:38, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

07:45:47, 27 December 2020 review of submission by Lindonlulgjuraj
Hello, My page for Lindon (Rapper) was declined by you. I am just wondering what citations are not valid? What exactly do I have to change or remove for this page to be accepted? Thank you Lindonlulgjuraj (talk) 07:45, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Lindonlulgjuraj (talk) 07:45, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Please review the autobiography poklicy as to why writing an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. To succeed, in essence you need to forget everything you know about yourself and only write based on the content of independent reliable sources with significant coverage of you.  Those sources must show how you meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable musician.  The sources you have offered are not significant coverage of you.  Such coverage does not include brief mentions, interviews with you, or other primary sources.  See Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 07:50, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

17:44:16, 27 December 2020 review of draft by Blue Bunting
My first draft was rejected due to lack of references in The Times or The Telegraph. I have added three references to brief articles in these two newspapers. I have also added references to 10 other newspaper articles about Taunton Elliott Viney DSO. I would like advice on whether these added references will be sufficient. Blue Bunting (talk) 17:44, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Blue Bunting (talk) 17:44, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Request on 17:46:59, 27 December 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Barejsha02
Dear editors,

I have corrected almost all the comments I could.

But

''This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject''

This remark is incomprehensible to me. How can I correct the article to bring it into an encyclopedic format? When writing, I was guided by articles about other Russian scientists in Wikipedia, for example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhores_Alferov

As to independent, reliable, published sources, they are given in article section "Publications about L. A. Sosnovskiy"

If possible, give the citation numbers from Google Scholar or equivalent

If possible, please give me a link to an article by some scientist on Wikipedia, so that I can see with an example how to do it correctly.

Sincerely

Barejsha02 (talk) 17:46, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

19:34:43, 27 December 2020 review of submission by 50ironclad50
I've elaborated more information on the company as well as adding some references to news articles other than in the Japanese language. It seems it has been occasionally covered by news outlets for past two to three years especially by those specialised in the display industry when it let out press releases or updates on the production schedule, for its unique manufacturing technology and the prospect of an OLED monitor. It certainly receives enduring attention and has notability at least in the OLED market. 50ironclad50 (talk) 19:34, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Product announcements and other routine business announcements do not establish notability. Please review WP:ORG, the notability criteria for businesses. 331dot (talk) 19:40, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the quick reply :) Actually this is not a draft I initiated so if I had known a rejected one has no chance for being re-considered I would've not contributed it sporadically spending my time. That's my bad. As for the issue regarding notablity, I don't believe the scope of the coverage of this company has been limited to routine press releases or brief mentions. The establishment of this company was covered with a detailed analysis in a Reuters piece and multiple news sources have been following this company for the reasons I mentioned. So the criteria for notablity seem nebulous to me in this case. Is there a guideline for submitting another draft on a subject that has been rejected? I'm not pledging on starting a new one but I might sometime if that was possible. 50ironclad50 (talk) 20:58, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I believe that in general it is okay to wait six months or more before submitting a draft on a previously rejected subject. If you have appropriate sources now, you should bring that up with the reviewer that rejected the draft. 331dot (talk) 21:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I have added the submit template for you, feel free to submit and I'll leave it for another reviewer to take a look. Theroadislong (talk) 21:22, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Got it. Appreciate your help! 50ironclad50 (talk) 09:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

20:21:50, 27 December 2020 review of draft by Bztwiki
Hi,

I'm asking help because I don't understand what modifications are asked for the page "Scalable Screen Font". I also can't see any add comment nor reply comment links, and I find it difficult to keep in touch with the moderators. One of them added some comments on the talk page, but sadly without direct links I could use. He suggested to use this interface, that's why I'm asking here. Sorry I make trouble for you. Bztwiki (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * You've been told repeatedly that Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified and notability established. Theroadislong (talk) 20:36, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Talk pages are edited just like any other page. There is no "add comment", just "edit". 331dot (talk) 20:52, 27 December 2020 (UTC)