Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 February 14

= February 14 =

03:29:19, 14 February 2020 review of draft by 216.10.217.148
216.10.217.148 (talk) 03:29, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * For a person to have an article here, they have to have received significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the topic. Your subject has not received this coverage, therefore can't have an article here.
 * Also, if you are being paid to edit, you are required to disclose this. I've left a template on your user page with the details.  Alex Noble    - talk  11:27, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, if you are being paid to edit, you are required to disclose this. I've left a template on your user page with the details.  Alex Noble    - talk  11:27, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

04:03:36, 14 February 2020 review of submission by Tempehislife
Hi user,

Please re-review this and let me know if I need to change anything for this.

Thank you, Tempehislife

Tempehislife (talk) 04:03, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

- I believe it's been re-reviewed shortly after resubmitting. To clarify, the current sources are insufficient. Some are primary and/or non-independent (e.g. LinkedIn), or unreliable (Crunchbase) or don't actually talk about the subject himself in any real detail, focusing on the company. Notability can't be inherited from a business to its owner/CEO etc. As a note, even if the Crunchbase source was accepted, a lone source couldn't demonstrate notability for the individual. Thus, hunt more sources that are secondary, independent (which rules out interviews), reliable and talk about Wilson in some depth (c 10+ lines, not including quotes). Nosebagbear (talk) 09:56, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

10:53:32, 14 February 2020 review of submission by Thinkthank2
Please Advise on how to edit the article and move to main article space as par cited source. The given source is enough for the one-liner Wikipedia article and shall grow afterwards with time. pls, advise.Thanks Thinkthank2 (talk) 10:53, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Your draft has been rejected, the topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia, no amount of editing is going to change that. Theroadislong (talk) 11:12, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

14:01:49, 14 February 2020 review of submission by Matthias.galler
The draft has been declined > I have added citations; online sources are in German language mostly, the only available English online source being the ENB's homepage, however

What else could be done to improve it?

Thank you very much.

Matthias.galler (talk) 14:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , References don't have to be in English, but for any business to have a Wikipedia article, they have to have received Significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the topic - see wp:42, which your draft currently doesn't demonstrate. For example, links to the firms own website aren't independent, and the details at stipendienlotse.de aren't significant coverage.  Alex Noble    - talk  21:07, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

16:25:53, 14 February 2020 review of submission by Catture
Hi there. I have now added a full discopgraphy to the page, to submit more of the artists work. Please advise what else I need to do to make this page live. Catture (talk) 16:25, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , the problem is notability. For anyone to have an article here, they have to have recieved significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the topic - see wp:42. The criteria at WP:MUSICBIO give a general idea of what musicians are typically notable.  Alex Noble    - talk  21:09, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

17:14:31, 14 February 2020 review of draft by 81.106.105.222
2020 is missing its details about Japanese television.

81.106.105.222 (talk) 17:14, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

18:02:05, 14 February 2020 review of draft by 2600:387:B:5:0:0:0:28
Hi there. could you help me better understand the feedback on this article? the sources I used are not paid/pr based. they are reputable industry trade publications.As a new editor I appreciate that insight. thank you.

2600:387:B:5:0:0:0:28 (talk) 18:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

2600:387:B:5:0:0:0:28 (talk) 18:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi . Cision PR Newswire and Business Wire are distributors of press releases. Citing such sources does nothing to establish notability. Trade publications, such as Insurance Business Magazine, New Food Magazine, Insurance Journal, and Insurance News Net are presumed to lack independence because of their often too-cozy relationships with the companies in their industry. That, combined with their narrow audience, means that such publications generally do not help to demonstrate notability. Comstock’s Magazine is an independent, reliable source, but it doesn't contain significant information about the company, only quotes someone who works there. You may find WP:BFAQ informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

18:06:40, 14 February 2020 review of draft by Timofeytv
Hi there! :) Could you please point on non-reliable references we used in this article? Referencing publications seems very reputable?

Thank you in advance for your help!

Timofeytv (talk) 18:06, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Who is "we"? Wikipedia accounts are to be used by one person only.  JTP (talk • contribs) 18:10, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

19:31:41, 14 February 2020 review of submission by Jcollinsycc
Hi- I believe I have the inline citations correct this time, but I want to make sure that the entry as it is meets the standard for Academic entries. I'm not sure how else to make it fit. Thank you for any help! Jcollinsycc (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

19:42:10, 14 February 2020 review of submission by Keith Fallico Musical Artist
Keith Fallico Musical Artist (talk) 19:42, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Dear Kylie,

This submission is 100% autobiographical and 100% true.

I know because I, Keith Fallico, wrote it myself. I lived it. I remember it all vividly.

I would not want to publish any untruths that might come back to haunt me.

Please rest assured.

Thank You

Respectfully,

Keith


 * Hi Keith Fallico Musical Artist Wikipedia has a policy No original research also see Conflict of interest - You may know your telling the truth, but you could just be making it up. Articles generally require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 19:47, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Got it

Kylie,

Does Wikipedia offer a service to research and cite for me all that I already know to be true? In such a manner, of course, that will pass your review?

Please advise

Thank You Keith Fallico Musical Artist (talk) 19:54, 14 February 2020 (UTC)


 * All Wikipedia editors are volunteers, so there aren't any "services" as such. If there are pressing matters or problems, they are generally attended to quickly. But in this case there are thousands of pending drafts and most need a lot of work, and there are very few editors who have time or interest to work on them. We have many help and advice pages written over the years. But we can only provide you with general advice about a draft here, and actual writing of citations for the article will likely remain up to you. Wikipedia strongly discourages you write this that you know to be true and only use material from reliable sources. Also make sure to WP:DISCLOSE and conflict of interest you probably have. — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 22:13, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

20:54:41, 14 February 2020 review of submission by John BG Johnson
John BG Johnson (talk) 20:54, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Now, if the issue with copyright of images has been resolved, can anyone help me finish this article? Thanks.
 * The draft has been rejected as not notable, the fact that you keep removing the rejection notice will not change this.Theroadislong (talk) 15:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)