Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 February 3

= February 3 =

02:58:10, 3 February 2020 review of submission by Ckfasdf
Hi.. I recently created draft article about National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups or NITAG in general (NITAG in the US is known as ACIP, and in Canada is known as NACI). Some NITAG already has its own article such ACIP, JCVI, and STIKO. I thought it would be proper to have article about NITAG in general (not country specific). Kindly someone please review the draft and accept if it is acceptable. Thank you.Ckfasdf (talk) 02:58, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , we don't typically review drafts on request here, however, because it isn't a bad article, and because I can't really see a reason why you submitted it through AFC, I've accepted it.  Alex Noble    - talk  13:28, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

06:10:14, 3 February 2020 review of submission by Jamporter
It is a page describing one of Australia's largest importers of European bathroom and kitchenware. Whilst many details are currently missing, it's creation will help guide people, particularly retailers, who have heard the name, know what Argent is.

Do I need to incorporate more of Argent's origin story? I can find that out.

Jamporter (talk) 06:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi . Wikipedia may not be used to "get the word out", "raise a profile", or any other form of promotion or public relations. The draft was rejected because the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). Most businesses are not notable. You may find WP:BFAQ informative. No amount of editing can fix the problem of notability. Rejection is meant to be final, to convey that volunteers do not intend to review the draft again. Pick a different topic to edit. We have more than 6 million to choose from, and 98% are assessed as less than "good" by the community, so there is much room for improving existing articles. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

11:04:39, 3 February 2020 review of submission by Bethany m m
Edits have been made - can this article be submitted for review again, please?

Bethany m m (talk) 11:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No changes since rejection? "a British based company that specialises in providing ventilation solutions" is just blatant advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 11:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

14:03:42, 3 February 2020 review of submission by Bethany m m

Then why do these have one? -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vent-Axia surely it shouldn't be one rule for one and another for another?
 * Please read Other stuff exists. Our standards have previosly been laxer, and that page probably shouldn't exist either.  Alex Noble    - talk  14:36, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

19:57:26, 3 February 2020 review of submission by YoonCheong
Hello, This page was declined for being "not sufficiently notable for inclusion". I wanted to ask for advice on how this page can be included in Wikipedia. David Amber is a very prominent figure in the global K-pop industry, writing and producing for top K-pop groups. I'd like to request a re-review. If the content of the page is concerning, please let me know so I can make changes. If David Amber is believed to be insufficiently notable for inclusion despite his contributions and achievements, also let me know. Thank you.

YoonCheong (talk) 19:57, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Subjects that are notable must have Reliable sources. Please read general notability guidelines to help you understand our criteria. Lapablo (talk) 09:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

20:27:33, 3 February 2020 review of submission by 70.15.42.220
70.15.42.220 (talk) 20:27, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

. Your page was declined as not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia because it fails to meet our General Notability Guidelines, they're no Reliable sources found online for the subject as well. Lapablo (talk) 11:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

20:57:45, 3 February 2020 review of draft by Yesness89
I'm not sure how to update my draft so that it gets approved.

Yesness89 (talk) 20:57, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

As the red banner at the top explains in the decline reason, you need to add reliable independent in-depth sources. WP:NSPORTS may provide more insights, however per WP:NSPORT, clubs and associations don't really have any extra "rules". In short, without multiple sources, we cannot accept the article. — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 17:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

23:49:09, 3 February 2020 review of submission by ABRG72
Hello! I have made edits to my original article and included information that explains this individual's notability as well as improved on the citations. Will this article be re-reviewed? Thank you for your time! ABRG72 (talk) 23:49, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * It does not look like any of the sources you have added pass WP:GNG as previously mentioned they should. It does not look like the subject is notable and I'm afraid there's nothing to be done. — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 00:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)