Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 February 4

= February 4 =

00:59:05, 4 February 2020 review of submission by 24.179.124.27
24.179.124.27 (talk) 00:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Most YouTubers aren't notable I'm afraid. Unless the media has taken interest in them, they usually don't warrant a page. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 02:05, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

01:28:29, 4 February 2020 review of draft by 47.219.19.95
I was given reasons the draft was rejected (i.e. costs converted to today's dollars, removed pictures of current property, removed list of events) but it still got rejected. All I'm doing is recording the history of a structure that no longer exists. IF someone wishes to rewrite the article by all means do it. I'm not a formal writer so my style is how I write. I'm not trying to "sell" anything. Please advise.

47.219.19.95 (talk) 01:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I've commented on the draft. If you are the primary author of the draft, remember to sign in to edit, it facilitates communication. --Worldbruce (talk) 20:08, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

11:20:03, 4 February 2020 review of draft by Xsider
My page checked and user give some tasks to change information. I update page, can someone check this? Xsider (talk) 11:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

12:07:29, 4 February 2020 review of submission by Jonashgs
Hello

I added third-party sources now - the psysical papers we wrote to keep scores for the tournament.

They are located in the tournament planners office

Kind regards

Jonashgs (talk) 12:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , it still isn't verifiable, as there is no practical way for any user to access the papers.  Alex Noble    - talk  12:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your response

But the sheets are physical, like a paper and not online.

So what do I do?

Kind regards


 * Google shows nothing for "John Poysti Classic", just two tweets for #JPCPPT from 2012, and no mention even on the school website https://www.holsby.org/. Just looks like something some students make up in 2012 and the rest is just fantasy. Deleting as a hoax is probably in order. KylieTastic (talk) 11:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

12:10:34, 4 February 2020 review of submission by 95.251.55.231
Draft:Sigismund Thalberg International Piano Competition

95.251.55.231 (talk) 12:10, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

I am the president of the Sigismund Thalberg international Study Centre The Sigismund Thalberg International Study Centre was founded in Naples in June 1996 by Principessa di Strongoli Francesca Ferrara Pignatelli, grandniece of the great Austrian pianist, and by me. The Study Center organizes a series of initiatives aiming at increasing the knowledge of the figure and the music of Thalberg. In October 1996 it organized the 1st International Congress entirely dedicated to Thalberg. The Study Center organizes too the Sigismund Thalberg International Piano Prize since 1998. Over the past 22 years the Prize has been won by some pianists who have subsequently won other prestigious awards like Sofia Gulyak first prize at Thalberg Competition and then first prize at the Leeds International Piano Competition or Michail Lifits third prize at Thalberg Competition and then first prize at the Busoni Competition in Bolzano and many others. We have done a page for Wikipedia - Draft: Sigismund Thalberg International Piano Competition - but it has been refused for several reasons, some of which are not true; for example "This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia". We are talking about a Piano Competition that has been held for 22 years and which is dedicated to one of the greatest pianists who lived in the 19th century. What can we do to get this entry accepted on Wikipedia? Thank you Sigismundthalberg

12:59:31, 4 February 2020 review of draft by 2406:3003:204D:CF:56E1:ADFF:FEC4:9C37
hi, my article got rejected. may i know 1. how to contact the person who rejected it to get more info (if possible) 2. what does this mean, "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia." 2406:3003:204D:CF:56E1:ADFF:FEC4:9C37 (talk) 12:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The user that declined your draft is named in the red box at the top of your draft, if you click the "talk" next to their name, it will take you to their user talk page where you can communicate with them. The passage you put simply means what it says- your draft does not have independent reliable sources to support its content.  Wikipedia is not for posting a resume or list of accomplishments, it is for summarizing what reliable sources say about the subject. 331dot (talk) 13:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

hi may i know why it got rejected? can i get more details? thank you

2406:3003:204D:CF:56E1:ADFF:FEC4:9C37 (talk) 13:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Please don't create additional sections of this page, simply edit the existing section. I've answer your question above, and told you how you can communicate with the editor that actually declined your draft. 331dot (talk) 13:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

13:35:08, 4 February 2020 review of submission by CleanBeautyDefined
HI there, we would like to know why our page was rejected and what we can do to change it in order to publish.


 * It was declined because the draft is just you telling about what I presume is your company's products as a blatant advertisement. That's not what Wikipedia is for- Wikipedia exists to summarize what independent reliable sources say about subjects that meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability. I'll add that you will likely need to change your username, please do so at Special:GlobalRenameRequest. 331dot (talk) 13:37, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure how to respond to your response, so I will try here. Without our link to how we define clean beauty by our company (which we are happy to take out), clean beauty is now very much in the zeitgeist and a burgeoning section of the beauty industry that lacks definitive description. Brands more and more across the board are using the phrase clean beauty as equivalent with non toxic skincare that doesn't have any association with a particular brand. And in our view it begs to be defined, and if not by us, it will be soon by someone else. There are also pages for 'organic,' 'holistic', 'green' etc... which are unregulated terms, but again, very much in the zeitgeist and used across the board in the beauty industry.,

CleanBeautyDefined (talk) 13:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I guess I was confused in that I thought you were writing about a specific company's products. Still, if you are in the beauty product industry, you should review conflict of interest. Your draft merely explains the term and does not summarize what independent sources have said; you would need to show with coverage in independent reliable sources that this term is in widespread use, see WP:NEOLOGISM. (place any response below this comment) 331dot (talk) 14:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Okay, so may we re-edit and resubmit to you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CleanBeautyDefined (talk • contribs) 14:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * You may edit and submit it again(not necessarily to me). I would advise you to read Your First Article and use the new user tutorial.  Again, if you work in the beauty products industry, you need to comply with WP:COI. 331dot (talk) 14:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

15:36:10, 4 February 2020 review of submission by KTA2019
KTA2019 (talk) 15:36, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , Howdy hello! We don't write about everything, and I'm afraid this company doesn't make the cut. Our standard is [WP:NCORP|notability]], shown by significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources, and this organization does not meet that. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

I would like to publish a Wikipedia page for Kerry Taylor Auctions but have had my draft rejected twice due to my citations. I'm a bit stuck and would appreciate some guidance please as to what I need to include.

16:38:11, 4 February 2020 review of submission by 2604:2000:15C0:4011:1D27:28CD:B7E0:3B16
2604:2000:15C0:4011:1D27:28CD:B7E0:3B16 (talk) 16:38, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The article is highly promotional and has been rejected. We do not exist to promote our subjects. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

17:18:13, 4 February 2020 review of draft by WPisarnik
My page - Draft:UICR Professional Driver World Championship https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:UICR_Professional_Driver_World_Championship - was twice declined, why, I did not breach any copyrights, yes I wrote it in MS-Word first and then copied it into Wikipedia 'Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere'

How can I get the copy I have in MS-Word into my page?

I had the country flags next to each Country name and this flags I got from Wikipedia is this reach of copyrights?

Please help LG Walter

WPisarnik (talk) 17:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Your draft has no independent sources and an inappropriate list of contact email addresses it looks promotional I can't see any copyright issues. Theroadislong (talk) 17:34, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

18:59:30, 4 February 2020 review of submission by Sukoner
Sudip Koner 18:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Do you have a question about your draft? The only content so far is "Sudip Koner (born 1st July, 1990)". Theroadislong (talk) 19:05, 4 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Your draft currently only consists of a name and a date of birth. There isn't an article here for us to publish.


 * However, please don't write an article for us to publish. Writing an autobiography in compliance with all Wikipedia standards is practically impossible, especially for new users. Also, take into account An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing, even if you could isolate your writing from yourself, and only summarise what the sources say.


 * Alex Noble   - talk  19:11, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

20:09:48, 4 February 2020 review of submission by Authorvednishad
Authorvednishad (talk) 20:09, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

why my article I LOST MY SOUL is deleted? i need to know why the wikipedia can not be created for ved nishad?

a publish author, poet and well known critics, can not create a pge in wikipedia?
 * Courtesy link: Unless it also was deleted from another location without notification, user is referring to User:123.252.231.175/sandbox, which was speedily deleted after I had tagged it per WP:CSD.  I do not have time at the moment for a detailed reply, but user appears to be attempting to promote himself and his own self-published novel.  --Finngall talk  01:01, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Request on 21:19:50, 4 February 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by 2001:8F8:1629:9A54:9CEB:DC2D:8DD4:B116
2001:8F8:1629:9A54:9CEB:DC2D:8DD4:B116 (talk) 21:19, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * This page has numerous issues. For one, it duplicates itself. For two, it has no sources or inline citations. It is also incredibly bare bones. Please do some more research and add more content. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC)