Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 February 8

= February 8 =

08:17:27, 8 February 2020 review of draft by JogiAsad
This university was announced, then foundation stone was laid, and at that time I had started a draft for that university, and someone probably reviewer suggested to resubmit when the university starts functioning. but still I don't see any newsreference about it whether its functioning or still in process.JogiAsad (talk) 08:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

JogiAsad (talk) 08:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , If few or no references discuss the subject, then it is not notable. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

10:08:44, 8 February 2020 review of submission by 2409:4042:2010:1460:FCD0:AEFC:969A:2408
2409:4042:2010:1460:FCD0:AEFC:969A:2408 (talk) 10:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

16:07:42, 8 February 2020 review of submission by 2409:4043:717:2E40:92F3:AEBC:A936:934C
2409:4043:717:2E40:92F3:AEBC:A936:934C (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The article is quite promotional in tone. Our articles present our subjects nuetrally, without embellishing. Your wording makes it sound like a promotional piece. If you have more specific questions, please ask them. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

16:30:45, 8 February 2020 review of draft by Reewrites
My article keeps getting rejected. This is my first article, and I am trying to write a page about a musician. He has several newspaper articles as references. Could you kindly let me know why the article is getting rejected?

Reewrites (talk) 16:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * You have been given some answers to your questions in your draft itself, at the top. In short, it is not clear that this musician meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable musician. The sources offered do not appear to have the significant coverage required- brief mentions, routine announcements(such as the announcement of the release of a single), and so on are not acceptable for establishing notability.  If you haven't already, please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

19:03:20, 8 February 2020 review of draft by Katerinapartlova
Katerinapartlova (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, what do I do when certain references are simply unavailable online?
 * References do not need to be online, BUT you do need to declare your clear conflict of interest on your user page, before you make any further edits. Theroadislong (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

20:46:13, 8 February 2020 review of submission by Erin miller2020
Erin miller2020 (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * As you have been told in the draft itself, it is an advertisement for what I assume is a product that you are associated with in some way. Please review conflict of interest and paid editing for some required formal disclosures you must make if that's the case. 331dot (talk) 21:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

23:55:54, 8 February 2020 review of submission by Jonashgs
Hello

I added our published sources.

Our sources are all offline and on physical paper.

Do I need to bring them online to get verified, or what do I have to do?

Please let me know, because usually physical papers are reliable sources - right?

Please help

Jonashgs (talk) 23:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Is this "Holsbybrunn" page 1 supposed to be a reliable source? Google shows nothing for "John Poysti Classic", just two tweets for #JPCPPT from 2012, and no mention even on the school website https://www.holsby.org/. Just looks like something some students make up in 2012 and the rest is just fantasy. Deleting as a hoax is probably in order. KylieTastic (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)