Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 January 1

= January 1 =

00:53:12, 1 January 2020 review of submission by Vesta82601
Removing all content from sources that give only passing coverage to the subject, as well as talks or content the subject has authored. Bare minimum stub that says why this person is notable, pattered off of the other co-founder Eric Ries. If insufficient, mark for deletion; thank you.

Vesta82601 (talk) 00:53, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

12:34:04, 1 January 2020 review of submission by Boltonyl
I am unsure as to why this has been rejected on notability grounds. In terms of notability, this person is ultimately a representative of Her Majesty the Queen, a British Government official, Charity CEO and one of the roles is Military based.

Boltonyl (talk) 12:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , We don't write articles about everyone, only those who have received significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. Many people are representatives of a head of state, but we don't write about every one. While this lad is certainly interesting, he does not yet rise to the level of notability required for Wikipedia. The sources do not show signficant coverage. The sources give only brief mentions, or are not reliable and independent. I think this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. Give it a few years, and this person may become notable. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 00:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

16:28:56, 1 January 2020 review of submission by Contentlinguistic
There are number of issues and solution for Fisheries sectors in most of the country and the solutions using different technology and process are initiated by this company which is awarded by indian central government (Meity). Contentlinguistic (talk) 16:28, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , The article was written like an advertisement. Wikipedia does not exist to promote its subjects. Please work on editing something else. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 00:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

16:41:35, 1 January 2020 review of submission by Nuggems
Please re-review this article. I have now edited this article to take a more neutral voice and remove any elements that can be construed as advertising and self-promotion. I have also added references and links to other Wikipedia Articles, making this Article now more notable.

Nuggems (talk) 16:41, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , The style and tone is still far too casual. It should read formally, from a disinterested perspective, and using encyclopedic terms. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 00:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

18:06:56, 1 January 2020 review of submission by Johnchhana
Review says I need reliable sources, but this is a union in a very discrete part of India. Does that mean I cannot get my article published if all my facts are not covered on the news? But I see many very short articles out there. Johnchhana (talk) 18:06, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , We only have articles about things that have been covered in multiple reliable and independent sources. If something is not covered by sources, we do not cover it. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 00:22, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

18:18:23, 1 January 2020 review of draft by OLIarchNY
To whom it may concern,

Although the resubmission included several additional references from the initial submission, the feedback remained the same and is therefore not conducive for improving the article.

In advocation of accepting this submission, I wanted to bring to attention that this article contains nine references to date; within the same category, there exist several pages with no more than two references (i.e. Mancini%E2%80%A2Duffy or SLCE_Architects) or incomplete references (i.e. SO-IL).

Please consider this as sufficient evidence for publishing this article. Thank you.
 * Be careful about comparing your article to existing ones. Many of the articles on Wikipedia were created before we began the rigorous Article for Creation process. That means a lot of ...honestly junk articles were created, and many of them have slipped through the cracks. You can read more about the logical fallacies involved in article comparison at WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Of the page you've linked, Mancini duffy should probably not exist, and SLCE needs more refs. I think the SO-IL article is questionable too.


 * In looking at your sources, they do not provide significant coverage of the subject. It is also overly promotional. Wikipedia does not exist to promote its subjects. You need to find sources that cover the company in depth.


 * Furthermore, you need to disclose any affiliation with the subject per WP:COI. If you have been paid by them, compensated in any way, or are an owner/employee, you must disclose that by following the guide at WP:PAID. Captain Eek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 00:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)