Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 July 1

= July 1 =

Request on 03:17:21, 1 July 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by LiliyaBulgakova
Hello, First of all, thank you for your willingness to help! I'm writing about the submission of my article "Digital Finance" for review. It was not accepted because of the following reason: "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject". However, "Digital Finance" article has a reference #4 to an independent, reliable source (Washington Business Journal), which published an article about Digital Finance and its invention - floating rate debt instrument linked to the Bitcoin performance. Besides that, Wikipedia article "Digital Finance" has references to the SEC website, where you can see that Digital Finance was actually registered as investment advisor in the digital assets space and that it filed with SEC its innovative financial product. Besides that, Wikipedia article about Digital Finance mentions efforts of the firm with regard to Bitcoin advocacy. They organized a Blockchain forum with SEC Commissioner (it was the first time SEC Commissioner participated in the blockchain forum!) and educated American lawmakers on the Capital Hill.

That being said, I believe Digital Finance deserves a coverage in Wikipedia, as it was: 1) one of the first, if not the first investment advisor registered with SEC in the digital assets space; 2) invented a first of its kind financial product, which performance was linked to the Bitcoin performance; 3) organized blockchain forum, where SEC Commissioner participated, and educated American congressmen about digital assets.

The company is doing really important things in terms of the digital assets industry development, advocacy, and regulation. I firmly believe it would be great if people are able to find this information in Wikipedia. Thank you for your time and I look forward for your feedback!

Sincerely, Liliya LiliyaBulgakova (talk) 03:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

LiliyaBulgakova (talk) 03:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * ❌. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:26, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

09:58:03, 1 July 2020 review of draft by Agneslesti1
Hello, I have attempted to create the above page - Draft:Hopster - for Hopster, the preschool entertainment platform, however, it got rejected. I believe I've met the guidelines at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Common_sourcing_mistakes_(notability) but if there's anything specific I'd need to change/add, please let me know so I can make these changes. The company is recognised in the children's media industry, hence the industry-recognised article citations, and it has been nominated for the Children's BAFTA in 2018 and 2019 so I believe the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. I am keen to make any necessary changes to allow for its publication. Thank you in advance for your assistance, Agnes

Agneslesti1 (talk) 09:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Well Agneslesti1, best would be to ask the Reviewers DGG and CommonsDelinker directly - for example on their talk page - what you furthermore need to modify. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

10:17:14, 1 July 2020 review of submission by Olumide.Sobande
Thanks for the feedback, it is much appreciated. Could you kindly advise on what can be done improve the quality of this article. Olumide.Sobande (talk) 10:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Olumide.Sobande - I am afraid but as you can see your draft has been rejected and will not be taken into further consideration since the subject of your draft is not notable for Wikipedia. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:32, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

11:17:24, 1 July 2020 review of draft by Tabrez290
Tabrez290 (talk) 11:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * your draft currently has exactyl zero reliable sources and therefore fails the verifiability policy. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:22, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

12:40:42, 1 July 2020 review of submission by Glammazon
Glammazon (talk) 12:40, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

What must l do to correct that problem?Glammazon (talk) 12:40, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

12:55:45, 1 July 2020 review of submission by Glammazon
Glammazon (talk) 12:55, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Have corrected the mistake in the link to Comics Plus, where scans of Inferno's first appearance are located.

16:20:46, 1 July 2020 review of draft by BabsW
Thank you... My article on the Niagara Jazz Festival was declined twice. The second draft I edited substantially, and thought I had removed any 'tone' of marketing or advertising. But it was declined for the second time. Could you give me some advice? Many thanks. Also, I havent had any luck uploading photos (that I own). I've certainly read articles on 'how to' but again, I don't seem to be very lucky on getting it to work. barbara

BabsW (talk) 16:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

16:47:51, 1 July 2020 review of submission by Sirob75
What about any of these links? Would any be acceptable and allow for this page to be published?

https://www.improvementservice.org.uk/case-studies/improvement-service/spatial-hub https://www.ukauthority.com/articles/improvement-service-aims-to-extend-spatial-hub/ https://digit.fyi/spatial-hub-unleashing-local-government-data/ https://www.improvementservice.org.uk/news/november-2019/spatial-hub-wins-scottish-award-for-quality-in-planning https://mailchi.mp/571baf205337/spatial-information-service-spring-newsletter https://www.agi.org.uk/news/agi/1473-the-language-of-geospatial-are-we-missing-a-trick https://www.spatialhub.scot/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/infographic.html

Sirob75 (talk) 16:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Request on 19:46:28, 1 July 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Beth Wimmer
I would like to continue working on my article that has been moved to Drafts, but I can no longer find the "Edit" button.

On June 18th, Rich Smith moved my beginning/attempt at article of "Manfred 'Little' Konzett" (recording engineer) to Drafts. [] I appreciate that, and his feedback that on June 18th, I had not included enough references. I now have four active, full cover references I wish to add to my Draft/Article. On my talk page, Mr. Smith and Wikipedia Team mentioned I can continue working on my Draft, but i can no longer find the "Edit" button at the "top of the window", as mentioned specifically in the directions written to me: "If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window." In fact, I no longer see the 'edit' option on any page i visit? I have logged out, cleared caches, logged back in. I can no longer find the simple "Edit" tab anymore. I see "Edit Source" at the head of each section, but this is not how I have edited/contributed to other articles. Can you please help? Thank you very much Beth Wimmer (talk) 19:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC) Beth Wimmer Beth Wimmer (talk) 19:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The "Edit source" button is the one to click if you want to edit. Theroadislong (talk) 21:22, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

21:31:15, 1 July 2020 review of submission by FrankWS875
Hello, I am trying to submit the Draft:Straight Talk Wireless|Straight Talk Wireless]] draft for review. I have edited the page to comply with Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and verifiability, and have declared all conflicts of interest in keeping with Wikipedia's guidelines. I believe that the page is now up to standards and is a useful article.

My previous attempts to submit the page failed, because I didn't understand Wikipedia's guidelines as well as I thought. Getting feedback from New Page Reviewers helped some, since I was not fully aware of the errors I had made the first time around.

I have taken the time to contribute to the project by creating and editing unrelated pages about history and the sciences, and I think I have a much better grasp on how to edit and write for Wikipedia now.

Now that I have edited the Straight Talk Wireless page draft, I am ready to submit for review again. How can I submit the draft for review by New Page Reviewers? FrankWS875 (talk) 21:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

23:46:37, 1 July 2020 review of submission by Christinedkg
Hi, could you provide more details regarding why this is not approved? I see many people with less impressive breadth and reach on Wikipedia. I will appreciate specific feedback please.

Christinedkg (talk) 23:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)