Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 July 22

= July 22 =

01:11:47, 22 July 2020 review of submission by Screaming Bloody Marys
Please give me feedback on what I can do to make this page acceptable for publication. I was not trying to promote or violate Andy wiki standards. I was trying to follow the format, but I am very willing to make efforts and changes that will satisfy the editors and staff at wikipedia, Thank you. Screaming Bloody Marys (talk) 01:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has no staff, just editors. Your draft was rejected, not just declined, meaning that it will not be considered further.  Your band only merits an article if it receives significant coverage in independent reliable sources showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable band.  Furthermore, you have a conflict of interest in editing about the band, and if you are a member or employee, you must comply with the paid editing policy.  You will also need to change your username. 331dot (talk) 07:03, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

02:18:25, 22 July 2020 review of submission by Jerianne20
Hi! I would like to request for reconsideration on rejected article.Can it be moved to subject for revieew? Since the band's existence may not be notable per Wikipedia rules (since I cannot cite the Gaon sources etc yet) but the band is officialy set to debut in August. I don't want the draft to be deleted since they will be relevant in the future.

Need your advise on this. Thank you.

Jerianne20 (talk) 02:18, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Drafts are deleted after six months of inactivity. However, your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further, so you will need to start from scratch.  I highly doubt that the band will be notable the moment they debut, they need to receive significant coverage in independent reliable sources showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable band; that is usually difficult for new bands to do. 331dot (talk) 07:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

02:57:04, 22 July 2020 review of submission by Jbsparrow9
I have edited the article and added an infobox, making it look much nicer and like many larger articles. Thank you for your time. Jbsparrow9 (talk) 02:57, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , your draft states that the streamer has 857 followers, which essentially means that he is nowhere near notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia. Even streamers with millions of followers often fail to attract enough media coverage to meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines, which require there to be extensive discussion of the article subject in reputable sources like news articles and published books. For this reason, the draft has been rejected, meaning it will not be reviewed again. I suggest you find another topic to write about as this one is unlikely to be a viable article anytime soon. Spicy (talk) 11:41, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

05:10:03, 22 July 2020 review of submission by CareAtya
CareAtya (talk) 05:10, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Why you guys deleted page I need clarification. because im not satisfied with your action .. its look like you are doing worng thing...
 * Your draft merely told about the company, and offered no independent reliable sources to support its content. A Wikipedia article must primarily summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen to say about a company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company.  Wikipedia is not interested in what a company wants to say about itself. The fact that this company might do good work does not mean it gets a Wikipedia article, as Wikipedia is not for telling the world about good works.
 * If you work for this company, you must read and comply with WP:COI and WP:PAID. The latter is a Terms of Use requirement for paid editors/company employees. 331dot (talk) 06:57, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

09:41:19, 22 July 2020 review of submission by 100.11.60.158
100.11.60.158 (talk) 09:41, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Hey, what do I need to do to make this article eligible? I didn't make it, but it looks correct.


 * ❌ This has to do with paid editing and WP:NPOV. Keep in mind it may need a rewrite to fix these problems. Eternal Shadow   Talk  17:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

10:38:08, 22 July 2020 review of draft by Wkigenyi
I tried to write an article but on several occasions it failed to meet the required standards (Draft: Andrew_Nai, Draft: Andrew Naimanye). However an article about the same subject has been written another editor. I now wish to delete permanently delete my drafts as I believe they are nolonger useful to the wikipedia project. How do I go about this ? Wkigenyi (talk) 10:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Wkigenyi (talk) 10:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi . There is no way to permanently delete anything on Wikipedia, deletion merely hides content from most users. The simplest thing would be to do nothing, in which case the draft would be deleted after six months of not being edited. You are not the sole author, so you may not request speedy deletion on those grounds. No one is likely to object if you replace the content of Draft:Andrew Nai1 with a redirect to Andrew G Naimanye, if that would be appealing to you. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:28, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

12:15:00, 22 July 2020 review of submission by Mujeebuddin1543
this application has a potential to grow world wide and help all the unemployed and underpaid employees out there, everyone has a right to know about something which can change their day to day lives. please publish or suggest Mujeebuddin1543 (talk) 12:15, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi . That is not the purpose of Wikipedia. You may wish to consider alternative outlets for what you've written; it will not be published here. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

12:41:38, 22 July 2020 review of submission by Dvaas
My article has been declined, although I have added quotes and do not see where there are fewer quotes here than in other articles I just hope it's not because it deals with Judaism in the broadest sense... I would like to try to change the article so that it is accepted, because the author is important. Dvaas (talk) 12:41, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi . You write "Gunda Trepp’s work focuses on ...", "Trepp was eager to familiarise readers with lesser-known Jewish life aspects", and "Trepp wrote the book as a reflection on her first husband’s death and called upon readers to face death in all sincerity and, in doing so, to actively make the most of the remaining time each of us has." How do you know those things, whose opinions are they? Are those your assessments from reading her works, opinions of a professional book critic, or things Trepp said about her own feelings and intentions? See WP:WIKIVOICE for guidance on how to write about opinions.
 * Wikipedia does not usually list a journalist's articles. Unless these particular articles are essential to understanding her biography, they should be removed. If they are kept, you need to make the selection criteria explicit. Also see Writing better articles for broader advice on how to improve the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:07, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

14:48:26, 22 July 2020 review of submission by Edward Roberts Editor
Edward Roberts Editor (talk) 14:48, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

❌ Non notable. Eternal Shadow  Talk  17:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

16:08:45, 22 July 2020 review of submission by Taushif123
Taushif123 (talk) 16:08, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Please specify a draft. Eternal Shadow  Talk  17:15, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

17:24:35, 22 July 2020 review of submission by 152.32.110.113
Sellbeta is a notable company in Nigeria and I believe it deserve to be on wikipedia, just like efritin.com it serves same purpose but a different company. I cited this article you can see all from the references and the fundraising part has been removed please kindly review and approve this article, with time it will be developing with more and more citations.

Thank you 152.32.110.113 (talk) 17:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Please create an account. There is a suspicion of paid editing. IT is easier to confirm or refute it with an account
 * It is your job to prove notability. This can only be done by referencing. But all about the organisation seems to be some sort of future potential. There is no deadline, so wait until it is notable and start from the beginning Fiddle   Faddle  19:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * It is your job to prove notability. This can only be done by referencing. But all about the organisation seems to be some sort of future potential. There is no deadline, so wait until it is notable and start from the beginning Fiddle   Faddle  19:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

19:51:03, 22 July 2020 review of submission by 1.186.197.157
1.186.197.157 (talk) 19:51, 22 July 2020 (UTC)


 * ❌ Promotional draft. Eternal Shadow   Talk  15:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)