Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 July 28

= July 28 =

00:21:53, 28 July 2020 review of submission by ChanieH
Thank you so much for re-reviewing this content. I have some confusion as how it has not met notability requirements? It has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources (as referenced). All the content is verifiable.

There are pages with less or a similar amount of external references that have been published in the same space such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usersnap, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biteable & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aha!_(company)

Thanks again.

ChanieH (talk) 00:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:ChanieH. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:04, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your paid editing declaration. I've nominated Usersnap for deletion, and proposed that Biteable be deleted as well. Neither is notable. That's all I have time for, but other readers of this page will no doubt consider whether Aha! (company) should be deleted too.
 * Draft:BugHerd, like Biteable, depends heavily on articles about raising venture capital. Such articles are explicitly excluded by the notability guideline from those that can demonstrate notability. They are considered trivial coverage. The Articles for Creation reviewer concluded that the topic does not meet the encyclopedia's inclusion criteria, so reviewers do not intend to review the draft again in the foreseeable future. Reconsider the situation in a year or two, by which time the company's circumstances may have changed (it may have gone public, for example), and more may have been written about it in reliable independent sources. You may find WP:BFAQ informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:47, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

05:12:26, 28 July 2020 review of submission by Jaisonabraham2020
Jaisonabraham2020 (talk) 05:12, 28 July 2020 (UTC) Please help me understand why my article was rejected ? Thank you

why was the article which i submitted rejected ? could you advise please.

Jaisonabraham2020 (talk) 05:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

can i resubmit the article. This is not a promotional content. This is the life story of a person who is Imran Faiz. I can edit it and resubmit. Kindly give more chance to do it. Please i kindly request. This is actually the life story of a person who has become a entrpreneur in his young age. I can really re edit and send all the links properly. Please accept it. Jaisonabraham2020 (talk) 05:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi . Rejection is meant to convey that you should stop, not create a new version, because the topic is hopeless. No amount of editing would make the draft acceptable. So volunteers do not intend to review the subject again. You may wish to consider alternative outlets, with different inclusion criteria, for your writing. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:16, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

07:58:18, 28 July 2020 review of submission by AL-Hassan.M.S
AL-Hassan.M.S (talk) 07:58, 28 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi . Editors may create a user page containing limited autobiographical information for the purpose of collaboration with other editors. If that was what you were trying to do with Draft:ALHASSAN_SHALIBAN, then you do not need to submit it for review. Simply write at User:AL-Hassan.M.S.


 * It is draft articles that need to be submitted for review before being published as encyclopedia articles. If that is what your sandbox submission was intended as, then please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space, blog, or social networking site. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

21:05:40, 28 July 2020 review of submission by Dpgame
Dpgame (talk) 21:05, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

hello our company is located in steam why not approved.
 * Because your company is not notable in Wikipedia's sense of the word, your draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 21:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

21:14:54, 28 July 2020 review of submission by Dpgame
Dpgame (talk) 21:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

23:00:32, 28 July 2020 review of draft by Giakuan
newer to submitting wiki though I believe all my references are correct, and would love to get approval on process faster.

Giakuan (talk) 23:00, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

23:15:21, 28 July 2020 review of submission by Wikintastic
Dear Wikipedia Admins,

I've created my first article with all my passion to this source and I've tried my best to do the article similar to ones which are already existed. However it was rejected due to several reasons, which I found objective and made another editing. I was sure that this time everything will be ok, because I changed everything according to mentioned rejection comments and informed the same user to re-review it. But the article was rejected again and this time with two new comments: - using of too many bold - DOUBT that notable for wiki

If these comments are right, why he didn't mentioned these one as well during first rejection? anyway, I removed all those bolds (just wanted article to look nice with that bolds), but how can user can reject an article due to his own doubt?

I've created article about a rising EDM producer and dj from Azerbaijan, who is local star and Internationally well known remixer with releases for big artists by big labels. There are no logic to reject this article, while there are several other wikipedia pages dedicated to other Azerbaijani dj producers and musicians who are even unknown internationally.

Please review it again and I Hope for your right decision and support. If there is a need for additional information or proof, I'm happy to provide.

Thank you!

Wikintastic (talk) 23:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)