Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 July 9

= July 9 =

07:53:44, 9 July 2020 review of submission by JuergenDoran
Dear Loksmythe,

thank you for reviewing my first article "PHYNE". I was wondering why you see my sources as unreliable? Beforehand, I looked at other fashion brands, as they used a lot of articles. That's exactly what I did. I would like to understand, how I can improve the reliability of the sources? As the goal of a Wikipedia Article is to be objective, I only wrote down information, which is objective.

Kind regards Juergen DOran JuergenDoran (talk) 07:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * First of all, we're gonna notify of this discussion. I'm not entirely sure on the reability of the sources, Howewer, not all appear to be significant coverage of the subject. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 09:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Good morning , I wanted to ask you whether you already had time to review my question?

Kind regards Juergen

08:14:57, 9 July 2020 review of submission by Ralamad
I have created the first draft which I had copied from NSSA.gov.bh and added references, which got rejected. I then created a new draft, all re-written by me. How do i know its under review? how do i publish it? Or if it gets approved it will be published automatically?

Ralamad (talk) 08:14, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I have added the submission template to allow you to submit the draft for review. However, you have no independent reliable sources to support the content of the draft, so if you were to submit it now, it would be rejected quickly. A Wikipedia article should primarily summarize what independent sources state; please see Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 08:24, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Request on 11:42:37, 9 July 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Tycheana
Hi, my submission - Draft:Kapil Sankhla - was rejected by reviewer DGG, and the reason cited was 'the cases do not seem important enough to justify an article', which I feel is unfair. In fact one of the cases, Gopal Goyal Kanda, is also mentioned on Wikipedia on the page Gopal Goyal Kanda, which proves that it is noteworthy. Every bit of information that I have put is verified through information provided in well-known Indian tabloids, all of which are listed on Wikipedia, and if the cases would not have been as well-known, they would not have received as much coverage in the media. The fact that I managed to find so many independent references is indicative of the fact that the issues made headlines at the time.

My presumption on coming across this person on media was that a lawyer's notability is best proved through his cases, especially those that have found mention in all the leading tabloids and also on some of the Wikipedia pages. That is why I have drafted the content as per the info that is readily available on the Internet under several newspapers which are also listed on Wikipedia. Requesting guidance from seasoned Wikipedians, veterans and reviewers on how to best resolve the matter, thanks & regards, Tycheana (talk) 11:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Tycheana (talk) 11:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

12:19:44, 9 July 2020 review of submission by Dwaynex18
Dwaynex18 (talk) 12:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Are local publications not considered as good citable sources? Does the subject matter need to be written by big publications that are mostly western to be considered a good source? MPL is big in Southeast Asia and just because it doesn't happen in the west doesn't mean it is not fit for Wikipedia or else Wikipedia is only for western stuff written for by big western publications. I now see Wikipedia to be more exclusive to western stuff only and not to localized stuff. MPL is mentioned by ABS-CBN news and have been broadcasted by its ABS-CBN sports channel in the Philippines and that's just our country not mentioning other southeast Asian countries with this esport happening. Mind you, ABS-CBN is the biggest media company in the Philippines. Or maybe, it has to be written by the biggest media company in the west to be allowed in Wikipedia. My problem is you put it to stop even if there can be room for improvement and given a chance.

15:56:43, 9 July 2020 review of draft by Agneslesti1
Hello, I have attempted to create the above page - Draft:Hopster - for Hopster, the preschool entertainment platform, however, it got rejected. I believe I've met the guidelines at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Common_sourcing_mistakes_(notability) but if there's anything specific I'd need to change/add, please let me know so I can make these changes. The company is recognised in the children's media industry, hence the industry-recognised article citations, and it has been nominated for the Children's BAFTA in 2018 and 2019 so I believe the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. It is also referenced on a number of different Wikipedia pages, such as these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TalkTalk_TV https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Pictures_Television https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children%27s_interest_channel

I have attempted to contact the reviewers (DGG and CommonsDelinker) directly, however I can’t see a way to talk to them. Could you please help? Thank you in advance for your assistance, Agnes

Agneslesti1 (talk) 15:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Request on 16:10:28, 9 July 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by B.n1995
Hi! I just created the article "Lukas Meyer" and it says it has copyrighted content in it, but I am not sure which part is meant here cause I think there are no copyrighted parts. Could anybody help me here?

Best

B.n1995 (talk) 16:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Since it appears that that was already deleted from the history, I can no longer check that. I will therefore inform the deleting admin of this section. I can howewer see from the page history that 909 bytes where removed, which is about a lengthely paragraph. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Significant text was copied from https://trustlaws.academia.edu/LukasMeyer/CurriculumVitae as should not have been done. But another editor has removed the copyrighted text, and an admin has hidden the revisions that included it in the history, so the issue is now fixed. The current issue with Draft:Lukas Meyer is the need for additional sources, and particularly for reliable sources which are Independent and include significant coverage of Meyer. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 16:27, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi! Great. Thanks for the help. I added some more sources now. Hope that helps.

Best

17:09:21, 9 July 2020 review of submission by JosiahMarist2
I don't understand why my article was declined. The reason that was given was not true as this person has been covered in Forbes (twice), Entrepreneur.com, TV coverage, local news stations, and other entrepreneurship websites (entrepreneurmindz.com, teenagerstartups.com etc.) It is evident that this entrepreneur has the coverage to have a wikipedia page. Please fix this mistake made by the editor. thank you!

JosiahMarist2 (talk) 17:09, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Courtesy link: Draft:Brendan Cox (Entrepreneur)
 * I went to review the sources to respond here, and decided that, after some clean up, they were sufficient, so I have accepted the draft into the main article space. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 19:50, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

18:20:25, 9 July 2020 review of submission by 197.192.122.92
New additions: news source for Egyptian actor and for tour guide. --197.192.122.92 (talk) 18:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

197.192.122.92 (talk) 18:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 20:48, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Request on 18:52:05, 9 July 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Whistleblower84
My article, "Mental Illness Policy.org was rejected. The reason given was that it was not consistent with the mission of Wikipedia.  I was hoping to get more detail, so that I can review and resubmit the article, if that is appropriate.

Whistleblower84 (talk) 18:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Copying and pasting an organization's description of itself is indeed not in keeping with the mission of Wikipedia. That mission is to summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about article subjects, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of notability(in this case, the definition of a notable organization. Please see Your First Article for more information.
 * If you are associated with this organization, please read and comply with WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Request on 20:39:39, 9 July 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Krupa Bhalerao
Krupa Bhalerao (talk) 20:39, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The draft was deleted as a blatant hoax. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:50, 9 July 2020 (UTC)