Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 March 11

= March 11 =

03:28:13, 11 March 2020 review of submission by HarveyYaz
I have been earnestly trying to prepare an entry on Boris Berenfeld that conforms to Wikipedia's standards. A prior reviewer said, "Still not *quite* neutral, though you seem to be putting effort into getting there." Never having submitted a Wikipedia entry before, I felt I was making progress. My last reviewer, however, said of my latest draft, "This remain PR after several resubmissions. Please stop." Moreover, I was told that if I "use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice." Can someone please give me some tangible guidance by providing an example in my entry of what is unacceptable? So informed, I'll then make any edits necessary to ensure my entry meets Wikipedia's standards. Thank you. Harvey Yazijian HarveyYaz (talk) 03:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , Your article has been rejected and will not be considered further. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:50, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

04:47:04, 11 March 2020 review of submission by Playlikeastar
please let me know what i have to do ? do you want me to delete ? provide lot of information also thier is nothing like self created document i have provided the details what ever avialable in the web

Playlikeastar (talk) 04:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , Your submission has been rejected which means it will not be considered further. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:49, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Request on 05:15:00, 11 March 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by MeeraShankar123
My name is Meera and I work as an inbound marketer at Social Beat. We are currently partnered with Assetz Property Group for their digital marketing campaigns. I had submitted an article describing the work of Assetz Property Group and cited the relevant references. However, it was rejected on the grounds that the references do not show significant coverage of the subject and that the article does not fully follow a neutral tone. I am requesting for assistance as I would like to know how I can improve the article and the type of references that need to be quoted. Thank you.

MeeraShankar123 (talk) 05:15, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , You need to properly disclose your paid for editing. I've commented on your talk page on how to do this. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:49, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

05:32:19, 11 March 2020 review of submission by Sabagull777
It's a very popular company have based in Dubai and providing and providing a lot of job opportunities to people of India and Pakistan and I want to create a wiki page for it. Comparing to this I have created a page for a local politician it's been accepted I am not sure why a company who is helping to feed a lot of families doesn't get the same opportunity.

Sabagull777 (talk) 05:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * How many families a company feeds has no bearing on showing notability. Please review the guidelines outlined in your decline message. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

06:55:02, 11 March 2020 review of submission by 2409:4066:B:1495:93A:C3C0:7A0C:695E
2409:4066:B:1495:93A:C3C0:7A0C:695E (talk) 06:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

08:42:35, 11 March 2020 review of draft by ArunasG
Hi,

What kind of other sources you need for the article? I have put two links - one with Lithuanian department of statistics on data of Lithuania, another - with wikipedia article on countries GDP. For me this looks perfectly enpough.

ArunasG (talk) 08:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , The issues were already listed in the decline message. Wikipedia cannot be used as a source. You also need to properly format your article (see Sulfurboy (talk) 14:35, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

13:54:01, 11 March 2020 review of submission by ساندرا
I would like to ask for the reason for not publishing Islam Bibi article, it does not contain anything against wikipedia article rules. Waiting for answer ASAP --ساندرا (talk) 13:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC) ساندرا (talk) 13:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You didn't link to any article. Sulfurboy (talk) 14:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The draft Islam Bibi was moved to main space by it's creator. Theroadislong (talk) 14:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

14:05:15, 11 March 2020 review of draft by NogardSg
I would like to know why my page has been rejected several times by the same person, I have tried to follow the guidelines of the other Wikipedia school pages and they continue to reject it. I really need your help to do it the right way and be able to publish it. I'd be really grateful

NogardSg (talk) 14:05, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , From what I see it has only been rejected once. For private schools we need to see how it passes either WP:GNG or WP:ORG, so far this is not shown. Sulfurboy (talk) 21:23, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

15:44:46, 11 March 2020 review of submission by Anonys11
Because i think you people should give a chance for a modelvwe all know to be popular too Anonys11 (talk) 15:44, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , The article has been rejected which means it will not be considered further. Your or our opinion on their popularity has no bearing on proving notability. Sulfurboy (talk) 21:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

16:45:35, 11 March 2020 review of submission by Annisd
Hi, added more significant coverage from multiple independent reliable sources.

Let me know that this is enough coverage.

Thanks! Annisd (talk) 16:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

19:36:11, 11 March 2020 review of submission by 4kingly
Becouase i changed it a lot added the logo of the company and I talk about its product I show sourses and I think it is better then it was when I began. 4kingly (talk) 19:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , The article has been rejected and will not be considered further. Additionally, the edits performed and sources added would indicate that you have not yet read our policies surrounding WP:GNG, WP:NCORP and WP:RS Sulfurboy (talk) 21:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

21:14:52, 11 March 2020 review of submission by 82.10.37.178
I need some help on this please

82.10.37.178 (talk) 21:14, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * What did you need help with? Sulfurboy (talk) 21:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

21:41:35, 11 March 2020 review of submission by Jedi2be
With help of user LittleBlueBori from #wikipedia-en-help i have removed all the the dubious elements from the article. I tried to write a quality neutral article. Please, review it again.

Jedi2be (talk) 21:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

21:53:08, 11 March 2020 review of draft by Shoshana9197
Hello, I am trying to edit this article that was submitted to wikipedia and rejected. When trying to save my work at the end of an editing session, I couldn't find a Save button, only a Publish button... I'm in the middle of editing this, and it still needs a lot of work. It's going to take more than one session to fix it before submitting it to the editors for review. I don't want the editors to think that by clicking on Publish I'm trying to resubmit. Is there a way to save during multiple editing sessions without resubmitting the article? Thanks very much for your help!

Shoshana9197 (talk) 21:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * In this context, "publish changes" is equivalent to "save changes". It does not mean "publish your draft to the encyclopedia ". It used to say "save changes" but was changed for legal reasons, to emphasize that the changes are publicly visible regardless of what is being edited. 331dot (talk) 22:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

22:14:48, 11 March 2020 review of submission by SymICiEl
It has been suggested the article does not align with the fundamental principles of Wikipedia. I have read these and they are summarized in five "pillars":

1. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia 2. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view 3. Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute 4. Wikipedia's editors should treat each other with respect and civility 5. Wikipedia has no firm rules

It is not specified which of these five pillars the article does not align with. In fact, the article is aligned with each of these purposes. It is scholarly, and as such, written from a neutral point of view. SymICiEl (talk) 22:14, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * First and foremost, it was a copyright violation, and I have deleted it as such. Second, it was essentially an essay of original research and not an encyclopedia article. 331dot (talk) 22:31, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

23:54:04, 11 March 2020 review of submission by Ima100k
Ima100k (talk) 23:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)