Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 March 14

= March 14 =

00:29:15, 14 March 2020 review of submission by Frank Marrows
Frank Marrows (talk) 00:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Verification is apextv.net instagram.com/apextvofficial Google ApexTV and you'll find it.
 * I'm assuming you're wondering why your article was declined. To merit inclusion into Wikipedia, the subject of an article must not just exist. It must comply with WP:Notability. That is, it must be supported by multiple independent, reliable sources that mention the subject of the article significantly (that is, not just trivial coverage). An instagram page and the company page aren't independent of the source (nor reliable), so they don't count towards the notability criteria for inclusion into Wikipedia. Your article has been rejected, which means AFC reviewers have made the determination that this subject isn't notable for inclusion into Wikipedia. I recommend that, if you enjoy editing Wikipedia, you edit one of the many articles already created or create a new article of a subject others have deemed to be likely notable (you can find a list at WP:Requested Articles). Let me know if you have any other questions! Sam-2727 (talk) 01:01, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

03:17:34, 14 March 2020 review of submission by Fyodor Sam Brook
Give me some advice Fyodor Sam Brook (talk) 03:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Fyodor Sam Brook. You've already started this article at Samkutty Pattomkary. There's a lot more information in the new draft article, but it's mostly unsourced, and we can't have two articles about the same person. Please continue adding reliably sourced information to Samkutty Pattomkary. You're welcome to ask for help on improving that, either here or at my talk page. Thanks, Capewearer (talk) 03:46, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Request on 07:30:35, 14 March 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Mohammad Faiq Shah
Mohammad Faiq Shah 07:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You essentially wrote your resume; that is not what Wikipedia is for. Please review the autobiography policy as to why writing about yourself is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia.  Wikipedia is not for telling the world about yourself; Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage state about article subjects that show how the subject meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability(in this case, the definition of a notable person).  If you meet that definition of notability, you shouldn't be the one to write the article about you.  Also note that a Wikipedia article is not necessarily desirable. 331dot (talk) 09:10, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

10:35:42, 14 March 2020 review of submission by Prasad3455
Prasad3455 (talk) 10:35, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Your draft has zero independent reliable sources and has been rejected as not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 10:40, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

20:07:43, 14 March 2020 review of submission by Capo7~nlwiki
My article was rejected. For the creation of it, I based myself upon the content of other record labels in the list electronic music. I would like to know what extra needs to be done to get this article approved?

If I need to add more reference then I can add the info of some releases on external media: Bouzidi - Lazy Monday North South Project - Phoenix Simpatiek - Auwey

Capo7~nlwiki (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Capo7~nlwiki. Your article was rejected which means unfortunately an editor has determined that it is likely not notable enough for inclusion into Wikipedia. Although your article has the general format of a Wikipedia article, you should look at the sources you have. To qualify as a Wikipedia article, a subject must be mentioned in multiple independent, reliable sources that cover the subject significantly (not just trivial coverage). For more on this, see WP:Notability. Some subjects simply aren't inherently notable. That is, no amount of research could make the article to a level acceptable for inclusion in Wikipedia. I would encourage you, if you want to continue creating articles, to create one from a list of subjects that other editors have determined to likely meet the notability criteria of Wikipedia. Feel free to let me know if you have any other questions! Sam-2727 (talk) 00:25, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

20:37:11, 14 March 2020 review of submission by Ness 129
Hello,

I submitted an article about the sailor Pip Hare (linked above) in February and received some really useful feedback which I applied.

I regularly check to see if the corrections have been accepted yet, but I just noticed that my Pip Hare article doesn't appear in the list of articles awaiting review.

So I just wanted to check that it is still in the queue to be reviewed. This is the first time I have created a wikipedia article so I'm very new to the source coding aspect!

Thank you in advance.

Best wishes,

Ness

Ness 129 (talk) 20:37, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi . The draft has been in the pool to be reviewed since 3 February. The current backlog is 3-4 months, so you can anticipate a review by some time in May. Neither The Daily Mail nor the Forbes site by the same contributing writer is a reliable source. You'll need to remove both of those to have any hope of acceptance. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I would also like to add that a lot of the language in your article has a promotional tone. Articles should be written in a neutral tone to qualify as Wikipedia articles. Sam-2727 (talk) 00:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

20:39:15, 14 March 2020 review of submission by Cerrenfly
The page I created for a photographer was rejected twice, saying that the page was created with copy-paste from the advertising contents. However, almost all of the sources shown on the page are major independent reliable national news sources. Today I made another small edits on the page with adding two news sources. I also checked the sought-after conditions for creative people for wikipedia and I think this artist meets all these requirements. Before I resubmit the page for approval, I would like to get help here because I am not an experienced wikipedia writer. Thank you and best wishes.

Cerrenfly (talk) 20:39, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

23:35:57, 14 March 2020 review of draft by Lemieuxn
How much context do I need to provide for a list of ... article? I have adapted the text of the article from that of List of social networking websites, granted that stakeholder engagement is less broadly known than social media. If I add three lines explaining the reasons why people turn to software to manage their stakeholders, would that be enough? And then again, this is not an article about stakeholder engagement software... Please help! Lemieuxn (talk) 23:35, 14 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi It is almost impossible to justify the existence of a "List of X products" page if an article about X does not already exist. So I think you should change it to an article about stakeholder engagement software, which can possibly contain a list of such software products.  Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks, I will take this under advisement. Lemieuxn (talk) 00:14, 17 March 2020 (UTC)