Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 November 8

= November 8 =

04:30:55, 8 November 2020 review of submission by 2607:FCC8:6EC6:6000:D1D2:DE5B:3C63:FA4A
2607:FCC8:6EC6:6000:D1D2:DE5B:3C63:FA4A (talk) 04:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * nothing even remotely looking like WP:NPERSON or WP:NACTOR. Instagra is not a relable source. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Request on 07:56:05, 8 November 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by AleksandrAAdamov
The article was declined because of "using PEACKOCK terms", which I never used anywhere in the article. This article not being accepted may very well be an expression of Russophobia that is extremely common these days, and not rational thinking. Please take a look.

AleksandrAAdamov (talk) 07:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi I have accepted the article and made a few minor changes. Please try to add some works in English to the Bibliography, I found several good ones with a Google Scholar search. Some of the templates you have used directly from the Russian Wikipedia, they need to be changed to the English equivalents. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:32, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

09:07:43, 8 November 2020 review of submission by Untr0
Untr0 (talk) 09:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

13:16:24, 8 November 2020 review of draft by Robert Kerber
This article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hunting_Rifle_(film) has been declined submission by user Gpkp for "lacking reliable sources". My question to be more precise which information/section should be verified was not answered. I've given my sources (IMDB and JMDB plus 2 film books) for release date etc. in the sections Bibliography and External links. Precise information which section(s) should be explicitly referenced would be appreciated. PS. I've been doing this for 10 years now so I'm not a beginner. Thank you. Robert Kerber (talk) 13:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Robert Kerber (talk) 13:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * IMDB is not considered to be a reliable source as it is user-editable. 331dot (talk) 13:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

13:24:33, 8 November 2020 review of submission by Vit-ali-yan
Victor Yanin 13:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

I tend to disagree that the list of books and journals does not meet the notability requirements, see the list below: I hope the overall list with addition of computer science books meets notabilty requirements:
 * TechCrunch editorial,
 * BetaKit editorial,
 * Inc Russia (chapter of the international independent business media),
 * VC.ru (we may call it Techcrunch of Russia, it's editor's article describes the venture-backed startup stories),
 * If24.ru (it's Investment Foresight media in Russian, independent media with editor's interview describes the venture-backed startup story as well, the media has got around half million visits a month) - added,
 * Crunchbase company's data (seems to be verifiable and legit) - added.
 * Handbook of Multimedia Information Security: Techniques and Applications,
 * Jump Start Web Performance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vit-ali-yan (talk • contribs) 13:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

15:15:18, 8 November 2020 review of submission by Serbelloni
Dear Helpdesk, can you explain to me : 1. whether I made a correct link to the article Civitella d'Agliano in Wikipedia Italian? 2. how to add a Google map under the Location chapter? 3. how to edit my style in order to improve the article?

many thanks to you

Serbelloni (talk) 15:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

16:29:18, 8 November 2020 review of draft by WikiWoggle
Hi, I'm not sure why my submission got flagged as an ad. I've stated plain facts from articles published by verified independent publications. Some were event-based while others were interviews. Please let me know where I'm going wrong with it, because there's hardly any content in the article either.

WikiWoggle (talk) 16:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It was considered an advertisement because it does little more than tell about the person and what they do. Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. Press releases, routine announcements, brief mentions and other primary sources do not establish notability. 331dot (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

This article mentioned in the sources goes into significant coverage on the person - https://www.ft.com/content/38d02382-f809-11e4-962b-00144feab7de. He's also the son of Jim Blanchard, who has a Wikipedia page as well - Jim Blanchard

Although Anthem's Anthem Vault isn't related to his father's company, his family history with gold and libertarianism and his current work with gold-backed cryptocurrencies is of notability in my opinion. Please let me know if I can frame it better or if it's still not notable enough. I will stop pursuing this draft. WikiWoggle (talk) 20:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * People do not merit articles because their family members do. Most reviewers want to see at least three sources with significant coverage. 331dot (talk) 20:43, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

16:53:50, 8 November 2020 review of submission by 2601:249:880:AB30:1903:8276:47BE:F5B3
Gowri Nadella is a professional model. She has been published in several different magazines and newspapers. The content within the Wikipedia article is factual and supported by the sources I cited. In addition, these sources are all neutral third party and reliable/ well-known publications that have interviewed Gowri or wrote about Gowri. Her career is widespread and is represented in all forms of traditional media. 2601:249:880:AB30:1903:8276:47BE:F5B3 (talk) 16:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The draft does not summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about her, showing how she meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. Interviews do not establish notability.  331dot (talk) 17:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * and Wikitia.com is not a reliable source and neither is Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 17:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

18:28:22, 8 November 2020 review of submission by Publicspeaker2020
please delete the previous article from wikipedia

Publicspeaker2020 (talk) 18:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It is unclear what you mean by "previous article". If you're requesting that we delete Draft:Maharashtra Students Welfare Association, there's no need for that at present. If it is not edited for six months, it will be deleted then. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:23, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note that this request came minutes after a different account with a similarly-patterned username created the same article in mainspace, now up for PROD (looks like clear A7-bait to me, but I'll leave it alone for now). --Finngall talk  21:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Noted! Added to watchlist. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:40, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

21:20:52, 8 November 2020 review of submission by 2603:8081:500:F700:598C:C0F0:7E34:AFD2
2603:8081:500:F700:598C:C0F0:7E34:AFD2 (talk) 21:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * You didn't ask a question, so we can't help. It looks like draft contributors failed to demonstrate that the subject is notable. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

22:40:07, 8 November 2020 review of submission by Lemböölä
Lemböölä (talk) 22:40, 8 November 2020 (UTC) why your article submission was declined
 * Since you didn't mention an article, I have to assume you're talking about Draft:Pauli Matalamäki. It was declined because you did not demonstrate that the subject meets our general notability guideline. See the large box at the top of the article draft. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:40, 8 November 2020 (UTC)