Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 October 13

= October 13 =

00:43:01, 13 October 2020 review of submission by 122.177.102.44
Sir, please check any of the companies / links / directly or on Google Digicodes (www.digicodes.in) iVoucher (www.ivoucher.in) Indiacompute (Www.indiacompute.com) Myopencademy (www.myopenacademy.com) Prepaidvirtual (Www.prepaidvirtual.com) Indiweb Holdings (www.indiwebholdings.com)

Digicodes is India's largest digital gaming and e-goods store for example. The company has 3000+ customer reviews and you can find the same on Google also. To be honest it deserves its own Wikipedia page. The same goes for some of the other brands.

Google itself is showing us in the same league as Steam, Gamestop, and other game stores in the 'People also search for' category.

So this page is for the parent organization which is even bigger and incorporates the other brands too.

Please assess basis these facts provided.

122.177.102.44 (talk) 00:43, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Article X's status, existence, or absence is irrelevant to that of Article Y. If anything, you're helping to show the G11 was justified. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 06:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

09:04:17, 13 October 2020 review of submission by GianoM
Hello, what kind of cleanup does this draft need?

GianoM (talk) 09:04, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

11:41:31, 13 October 2020 review of submission by 2001:8F8:1B21:AECE:2061:D510:B7B5:419
2001:8F8:1B21:AECE:2061:D510:B7B5:419 (talk) 11:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

15:36:10, 13 October 2020 review of draft by Mbounthavong
I want to request a review of the article to determine if it meeting eligibility criteria.

I have included independent references to support statements made about the subject of the article. Of note, I want to highlight the FDA's use of the subject's guidelines to clear develop and use patient report outcome instruments for evaluations.

Thanks for your time and please let me know if there's more that I can do.

Mbounthavong (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Mbounthavong (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

20:11:35, 13 October 2020 review of submission by Djb2183
I believe the subject is indeed notable, and I do not believe anything in the article is promotional. It is just basic facts with nothing more. I removed a couple sources and added a couple more that I think are more in line with what the editor is looking for. Thank you.

Djb2183 (talk) 20:11, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Your draft was rejected as not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia, it won't be re-considered. Theroadislong (talk) 20:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

22:54:43, 13 October 2020 review of submission by JPSilvaggio
Greetings,

Was confused by the reviewers comments that I need 'reliable sources', am I suppose to link to the independant news articles relating to me. If so, should I also delete the references I made within the article to the scanned documents proving what I am saying? Google and Bing's 'Knowledge Panel' lists me as a politican should I include them sources as well? Please advise.

-John Silvaggio JPSilvaggio (talk) 22:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * First, We don't care about whatever you have to say about yourself. Second, you need to cite those independent news sources, and you need a news source for EACH AND EVERY SINGLE CLAIM the article makes. The Knowledge Graph and its imitators are never a useful source (since most of the time they pull from Wikipedia). —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 23:46, 13 October 2020 (UTC)