Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 October 15

= October 15 =

01:06:05, 15 October 2020 review of submission by Naeem95
I am requesting a review because this player is a professional soccer player and have played for 3 professional teams in the USA and 1 pro club in Germany. He has sufficient articles that was provided and connections to professional clubs as seen on their wiki page. Thank You ! Naeem95 (talk) 01:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Unless any of those professional teams were in a top-level national league (i.e. MLS or Bundesliga) or on this list, WP:NFOOTY is not satisfied. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Takes a strong man to deny... 06:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC) (edited 06:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC))

01:44:37, 15 October 2020 review of submission by Sahnilbigfan
Please I want you to review this Draft again because someone else interrupted this draft. Please review it again as Sahnil is a social media influener as well as an India tv actor. Hoping the best from you! Thank you for understanding!

Sahnilbigfan (talk) 01:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

02:02:57, 15 October 2020 review of draft by Trndsettr4fire
I requested a page Trndsettr4fire (talk) 02:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC) Trndsettr4fire (talk) 02:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is a volunteer project. People have to endeavor to build articles, not just request them. The draft linked above lacks most details, so it's not particularly useful. Sorry. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

05:43:11, 15 October 2020 review of submission by FamdomFom76
FamdomFom76 (talk) 05:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC) 05:43:11, 15 October 2020 review of submission by FamdomFom76 FamdomFom76 (talk) 05:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Hi How can I Create a Article That Meets The Wikipedia Community Standards?

05:43:11, 15 October 2020 review of draft by FamdomFom76
,
 * You are goign to need several reliable (no user-generated content) independent(no press releases or interviews) sources with significant coverage(not yust passing mentions) to show that the subject meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:56, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

07:00:38, 15 October 2020 review of draft by Jener13
Hello, can you pleaes review the new page "Jos. Kraus & Co." At the moment only exist in german language, I try to create an english page. Thank you very much for your help. jener13

Jener13 (talk) 07:00, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

07:48:12, 15 October 2020 review of submission by Katdot89
Hi. The previous post was created by another user. I am a totally independent reviewer interested in writing about Gaming companies in Malta. I have edited the existing draft to a totally unbiased view of the company. The comment by the first Wikipedia reviewer, was based on the first submitted draft by the other user. I'd appreciate if I can better understand what falls under 'contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia'. Thanks Katdot89 (talk) 07:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * It is not easy to find a draft unless you know where specifically to find it, and you have not edited about any other topics. How did you come to be interested in this topic if you are "totally independent"?
 * The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It just tells about the organization and what it does.  Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the organization, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. "Significant coverage" is in depth and goes beyond brief mentions, name drops, announcements of routine business, staff interviews, and other primary sources. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

08:34:39, 15 October 2020 review of submission by Aie555
I've take the time to go through this draft article and made several improvements: I've removed trivial sources, removed unsourced statements, and added new authoritative sources that were not available at the time of the last review. Some of the sources from outlets that are authoritative in the language technology industry or in the Czech Republic. On the suggestion of the last reviewer, I am submitting this for an additional review.

For the sake of full disclosure, I do have a potential conflict of interests: I work in the language technology sector and have had a professional relationship with Memsource.

Aie555 (talk) 08:34, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The draft has been rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. Please review the comments given in the draft. 331dot (talk) 08:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, based on your advice from my last submission I reached out to who reviewed and rejected the draft previously, and he suggested that I submit it for review again. Is this not possible? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aie555 (talk • contribs) 09:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If the reviewer that rejected the draft believes you should resubmit it, then I would ask them to reverse their rejection. 331dot (talk) 14:19, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

16:03:48, 15 October 2020 review of submission by Mohd Hamdaan Ansari
Mohd Hamdaan Ansari (talk) 16:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * This draaft currently lacks reliable independent sources with significant coverage and as such currently fails WP:NPERSON. Apart from that, its also written in a promotional manner. Thats the exact reason why we strongely discourage autobiographys. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

17:53:50, 15 October 2020 review of draft by Rubiesar
Rubiesar (talk) 17:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC) Please I need to tag reviewers to my contribution https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BJ_Sam

18:01:54, 15 October 2020 review of draft by 2601:243:80:E3B0:8CB3:1DDF:6C53:A4BD
Having trouble getting the article approved because there was a second Landline film that was already given the subject heading in 2017. This is a different Landline film with different credentials and articles related. I'd love to know how we can get this one approved after the previous editor denied us for having the same subject as another film. Thank you so much.

2601:243:80:E3B0:8CB3:1DDF:6C53:A4BD (talk) 18:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are the author of the article,, please remember to sign in when editing Wikipedia. Since it is a different film from Landline (film), I recommend simply resubmitting the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

18:49:53, 15 October 2020 review of draft by Rubiesar
Rubiesar (talk) 18:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Please kindly Singer-songwriters to my contribution https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BJ_Sam
 * It is unclear what you are asking. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not social media and does not do tags. Drafts do not get categories appended to them as a general rule. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Takes a strong man to deny... 20:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

20:09:13, 15 October 2020 review of submission by 2A02:C7D:14D2:3C00:B91C:1791:C4B8:7BFC
2A02:C7D:14D2:3C00:B91C:1791:C4B8:7BFC (talk) 20:09, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Rejected drafts will not be considered further. Repeatedly submitting a draft without making any substantial changes to it is a waste of the submitter's time and ours. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Takes a strong man to deny... 20:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

21:00:57, 15 October 2020 review of submission by Acidskater
I would like to request a review of draft:Israel Weinstein as I believe it was incorrectly denied. While there was some problematic wording which I have since cleaned up, I believe that the admin's ruling is incorrect. In asking the admin to expand on their reasoning so that I could assist the creator in editing the draft to get it published I was given nothing of substance and instead told that the admin suspected the creator of violating WP:COI "due to the article creator's contribution", which is even more vague and feels like the admin is leaning into not assuming good faith. I would be interested to hear from others, especially if anyone agrees with the original admin and can point out areas they believe are problematic. Questions to the admin who denied the draft and their responses can be found here. Acidskater (talk) 21:00, 15 October 2020 (UTC) Acidskater (talk) 21:00, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

21:10:26, 15 October 2020 review of submission by Picvdo
Picvdo (talk) 21:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft was blatant promotion which is not permitted on Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 21:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)