Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 October 17

= October 17 =

02:20:41, 17 October 2020 review of submission by S.H.I.V.A.M.P.A.N.D.E.Y12
S.H.I.V.A.M.P.A.N.D.E.Y12 (talk) 02:20, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * no sources ? Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

02:21:09, 17 October 2020 review of draft by Esther KATO
Esther KATO (talk) 02:21, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every biographical claim the draft makes must be cited to a strong secondary source. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Takes a strong man to deny... 19:27, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

02:53:17, 17 October 2020 review of submission by 85.210.104.25
85.210.104.25 (talk) 02:53, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * This is a resume, not an encyclopedia article. -- Kinu t/c 06:40, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

06:45:51, 17 October 2020 review of submission by Fade258
Hello administrator ! I recently created the page called Birendra Multiple Campus and that page was deleted. I don't think so that i had made any mistake to create this page and after the deletion i had made an few changes to my page.If that was correct then kindly moved this article to articles mainspace. (Fade258 (talk) 05:16, 17 October 2020 (UTC))
 * First, I need to correct you: Its not "your page" in the sence that you can decide who is doing what with it. After a first look at the draft I detected that it uses two pages as a source, which both end up at 404 Not Found error pages. as such, the draft currently fails WP:V and will not be accepted. Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:45, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

07:14:53, 17 October 2020 review of submission by Hari4123
Hari4123 (talk) 07:14, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The page has been rejected (and subsequently deleted) and will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a billboard. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Takes a strong man to deny... 19:31, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

08:43:27, 17 October 2020 review of submission by Fade258
Fade258 (talk) 08:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Theroadislong ! If i add 50% same this content and 50% other with strong sources and good category then can i  create the article again. (Fade258 (talk) 08:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC))

08:46:33, 17 October 2020 review of submission by Fade258
Fade258 (talk) 08:46, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Theroadislong ! If i add 50% same content and 50% other with strong sources and good category then can i create this page again. (Fade258 (talk) 08:46, 17 October 2020 (UTC))
 * If you add 50% same content again, 50% of the draft will still not meet Wikipedia's rules. Please be aware that no amaount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. What would be required right now is your WP:THREE take as much time as you need. Victor Schmidt (talk) 08:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Hellor it's me there again .That means noone can't create this page with this name. (Fade258 (talk) 09:05, 17 October 2020 (UTC))
 * If no sources that meet WP:THREE can be found, yes, then an article with this topic cannot be created, at least today or tomorrow. What happens in the future cannot be determined. Victor Schmidt (talk) 09:24, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

10:30:03, 17 October 2020 review of draft by Cairek007
I would like to ask for your help with writing of the wikipedia article. I try it for the first time and I choose topic about the use of smart phone to determine the quality of food. The name of the article is FoodSmartphone and that is the name of European public project, so as I wrote the wiki article for my first time (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:FoodSmartphone), I was inspired in other wiki articles, which write about some type of projects. I also read all kinds of FAQ, advices for beginners, technical help, mistakes to avoid etc., but it did not help me. When I tried to submit it, Wiki-reviewers had problems with this topic. I am looking for a way how to write this article correctly, how to show your reviewers, that the topic is not commercial. I have no personal interest on it, but I am convinced that this topic could be interesting for the wiki users. Cairek007 (talk) 10:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * It reads more like it's advertising or promoting the subject. There is such a thing as being too detailed, and lists of objectives, number of associated groups, etc. is utterly irrelevant to the sort of person that would be looking in a general encyclopaedia for background information on the topic. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Takes a strong man to deny... 00:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

16:13:19, 17 October 2020 review of submission by 1pragnan
1pragnan (talk) 16:13, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Procedural Note: Deleted by Materialscientist for failing Wikipedia's purpose as an advert. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

16:41:47, 17 October 2020 review of submission by OMGShay 92
OMGShay 92 (talk) 16:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC) 16:41:47, 17 October 2020 review of submission by OMGShay 92 Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/OMGShay 92 Why was my Wikipedia article unaccepted just because I don't know how to add references? OMGShay 92 (talk) 16:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

21:49:34, 17 October 2020 review of draft by Naijabroads
I need help on adding tags to a draft

Naijabroads (talk) 21:49, 17 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Appropriate WikiProject tags have been added to Draft:Icon Spielberg. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:36, 18 October 2020 (UTC)