Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 April 25

= April 25 =

00:39:53, 25 April 2021 review of submission by Mattedia
The term "cycloatom" was created in the US English as new and by original research published in the United States science journal and it is sufficient for the new term to be known through the encyclopedia. The term was never used before at the best of my knowledge and also there no any reason to hide the new word in the US English and that it was created.
 * That's an argument for not including it. We're an encyclopaedia, not a dictionary, and if there's a distinct lack of sources we can't have an article on the topic. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 18:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

06:28:40, 25 April 2021 review of draft by 124.123.80.139
124.123.80.139 (talk) 06:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * We do not accept material that has been plagiarised, full stop. This is not negotiable, as it potentially puts Wikipedia and any editors introducing the material in legal jeopardy. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 18:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

10:31:25, 25 April 2021 review of submission by Syedfardeen2929
Syedfardeen2929 (talk) 10:31, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, please see the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 11:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

13:27:51, 25 April 2021 review of submission by Ancy Cha
Ancy Cha (talk) 13:27, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

not in mind
 * This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. We are not a personal webspace for you to attempt creative writing or pontificate on the meaning of things. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 18:27, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

19:18:42, 25 April 2021 review of submission by Bruhmaster15
Its not a hoax its a real thing based on my research theres many people having pantosexuality, (and im one of them). Bruhmaster15 (talk) 19:18, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Come back when this term is widely used and discussed in independent reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 19:24, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * @Bruhmaster15 There exist absolutely 0 evidence for this term, this is (was) a hoax. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:11, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

19:35:09, 25 April 2021 review of submission by Leonardo Demi-God
Leonardo Demi-God (talk) 19:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)


 * @Leonardo Demi-God It has already been explained by me and User:Theroadislong, please read the decline messages carefully. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:10, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Why was my article declined?
 * its described in the large light blue box at the top of Draft:Browzan. For reference, I copy it here (without the explanatory links included into the original) Victor Schmidt (talk) 05:52, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

21:40:47, 25 April 2021 review of submission by Kaifraza786
How you say that this topic is not notable. This topic is notable because Muhammad Kaif Raza Khan Qadri is representing all over the world Sunni Muslim"s how can you say that shit. Kaifraza786 (talk) 21:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * This draft has been rejected, is at Miscellany for Deletion, and will not be considered further. What is your connexion to the subject? —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 06:04, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

22:10:14, 25 April 2021 review of submission by Onlyyou1
Good day. This page is not fake, there is a link to watch the movie on IMDB. I can only provide you with Russian-language links to this film. What's the problem with publishing this article? I can also provide information about the director of this film (he is also an actor), he is a fairly well-known personality in Belarus as a theatrical figure.

Onlyyou1 (talk) 22:10, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * IMDB is not considered a reiable source because it is user-generated. the existence of other inappropiate articles doesn't mean you can create another one. It means that those articles should either be edited or deleted. Victor Schmidt (talk) 05:49, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * To add to Victor's responce, article drafting was not a major part of Wikipedia until ca. 2011 and wasn't made mandatory until 2018; any articles created prior to those dates (the 2011 one especially) are unlikely to have been put through the AfC process. Our standards, and enforcement of same, have only toughened over the years, and what would have been acceptable even back in 2015 would be problematic today. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 06:07, 26 April 2021 (UTC)