Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 August 6

= August 6 =

06:32:45, 6 August 2021 review of submission by Shekhar Aman
I have removed all the external links. I have kept all the point as neutral. Also, I have mentioned all the valid sources. Shekhar Aman (talk) 06:32, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No amount of editing can make a subject notable. Your submission was rejected out of a lack of notability. It still has many issues, even after improvement. Eternal Shadow   Talk  16:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

13:41:08, 6 August 2021 review of draft by Pompancake
I was wondering about the requirement of notability. I tried to create an article about the murder of Lorraine Cox in Exeter, UK. It was declined with the response of "NCrime". I was wanted to create a page to inform others of her violent death in the aftermath of Sarah Everard. There were many vigils around the country in response to her death and in the city of Exeter there was a large number of people also mourning Lorraine Cox. Is notability just based on how publicised the death is? Or is it due to the status of the murderer i.e the number of people they kill? I can't seem to find a definition of what NCrime means specifically. Sorry if someone has responded to me before I cannot find it.

Pompancake (talk) 13:41, 6 August 2021 (UTC) Pompancake (talk) 13:41, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ”NCRIME” refers to WP:NCRIME. Perhaps the reviewer may have explained it better. Notability has to do with the coverage in sources, which is ok in this article. Eternal Shadow   Talk  16:36, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

15:11:09, 6 August 2021 review of submission by AlamaHamidAksar
AlamaHamidAksar (talk) 15:11, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ❌ You didn’t ask a question but your submission was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. Only a few months have passed since deletion and the submission still fails WP:GNG and is still written relatively promotionally. Eternal Shadow   Talk  16:30, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

17:38:40, 6 August 2021 review of draft by Enrico Bartoccioni
To. Mr. Paul W

Elisabetta Campus ".....This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)......"

Dear Sir, this article about Elisabetta Campus has already been published in the Italian version of Wikipedia. So the sources have already been verified by your colleagues. However, I am available to translate them for you as well. In this link there is the italian version: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elisabetta_Campus

The problem is that I have not been able to use your translation systems and your program did not allow me because I had no experience.

The sources refer to the achivistic superintendency of Umbria, which is a state institution.

I can certainly modify the article according to your instructions, if you agree with the points above.

Thank you for your work

Enrico Bartoccioni--Enrico Bartoccioni (talk) 17:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Enrico Bartoccioni (talk) 17:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Whether or not it.wp accepted the sources or not is immaterial, as en.wp and it.wp are different projects which set their own standards for sourcing, and as far as living people go en.wp is one of the stricter ones. I suggest reading en.wp's sourcing policies, not least the two I linked, as opposed to judging the article by it.wp's. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 20:54, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Request on 18:14:01, 6 August 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Kunal0702
Thank you so much for your quick review, but I'm a little bit disappointed here because I followed all rules and mentioned all reputed sources like LinkedIn. so as you mentioned, "Current sources are too reliant upon press releases" may I know this article sources are eligible, which is already approved by the Wikipedia team? "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumio"

Kunal0702 (talk) 18:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * It wasn't "approved by (reviewers)". LinkedIn is not acceptable as a source, the Yahoo Finance article is marked as coming from Cision/PR Newswire, and PRNAsia is likewise attributed to Cision/PR Newswire. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 20:57, 6 August 2021 (UTC)