Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 August 7

= August 7 =

06:56:30, 7 August 2021 review of submission by Mr. Hailo
Mr. Hailo (talk) 06:56, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

This article is the translated version from the german article of Oscar Leonardo Franco Vivas. He is an well known artist in Colombia and the informations standing in the article are coming directly from Oscar Franco.

German article: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscar_Leonardo_Franco_Vivas

Mr. Hailo (talk) 06:56, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * de.wp and en.wp are separate projects with separate standards, and one standard en.wp has that de.wp does not is WP:Biographies of living people. Completely unsourced biographies about living people are not only grossly unacceptable here, but at risk for deletion. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 07:12, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

11:32:30, 7 August 2021 review of submission by Shoki2021
Shoki2021 (talk) 11:32, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected and deleted as blatant promotion and a copyright violation. 331dot (talk) 12:10, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

12:34:30, 7 August 2021 review of draft by Elisafrag
Elisafrag (talk) 12:34, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question. 331dot (talk) 12:38, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Dear, 331dot It took a long week for me to compile all the information on my recent draft that I submitted for approval but it got rejected. The article was about Anthony B. Catachanas a well-known personality in the UK investment market back in the 1920s his father and grandfather have also contributed to the Greek community a lot which I am preparing an article it will take around a month more to publish about his father. I have used all the authentic resources in the article but still the article of Anthony B. Catachanas ‎is been rejected I would like you to review the article again and suggest me the best thing to do with the artcile to get this published. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elisafrag (talk • contribs)
 * The draft is sourced almost completely to press release-type articles or sources that hardly mention Mr. Catachanas, if they mention him at all. A person merits a Wikipedia article if they receive significant coverage in independent reliable sources that show how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person.  He himself needs to get coverage, not just things he is associated with.
 * If you work for Mr. Catachanas or are otherwise associated with him, you must review paid editing and conflict of interest for information on required formal disclosures. 331dot (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

16:25:34, 7 August 2021 review of submission by FlowerMoon593
Hi, I recently sought advice via the live help chat. I have made all changes advised...would it be possible to request a re-review please? Much appreciated.

FlowerMoon593 (talk) 16:25, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * You will need to ask the reviewer that rejected the draft directly, describing the new information you have. 331dot (talk) 17:10, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

18:39:55, 7 August 2021 review of submission by Brshipley
I recently submitted an article on a relatively new World Heritage site in Greenland that contains several distinct and important archeological locations, including the site on Nipisat Island. It was rejected because Nipisat Island currently has the infobox of the entire World Heritage Site, and it was suggested that I simply include the information in my draft into the Nipisat Island page. While I somewhat agree that the draft I wrote needed more content (and have added more information since the earlier submission), I disagree that it should be merged with Nipisat Island, given that 6 out of the 7 archeological sites protected by the World Heritage Site are not, in fact, on Nipisat Island. In my opinion, that would be somewhat misleading, similar to not including the Yellowstone National Park article because there exists an article on any one of the many geysers within the park. Is there a way I can resubmit the draft without having to merge it with Nipisat Island, as the reviewer's comments suggest I do? Thank you! Brshipley (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2021 (UTC)


 * @Brshipley Start by having this conversation with the reviewer who suggested the merge Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 07:21, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

23:56:27, 7 August 2021 review of submission by Supermann
Nobody has since chimed in on the new edits related to the actor's stage performance and notability. The discussion was archived without any response. Not sure if this was intentional snub or what. Thanks.

Supermann (talk) 23:56, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. If you have new information that establishes notability that the reviewer did not consider, you will need to approach them directly. 331dot (talk) 07:49, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I already did. As I wrote, nobody gave new comments on the stage performance context that I added. It can't be that bad. Thanks Supermann (talk) 18:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)