Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 December 29

= December 29 =

11:07:27, 29 December 2021 review of submission by Bobe8q8661
What is wrong with my draft, I need a reason for it. So that, I can improve it. Bobe8q8661 (talk) 11:07, 29 December 2021 (UTC)


 * @Bobe8q8661 there is nothing right about it. Please read Help:Your first article. In addition it contains major copyright violations. I have asked that it be deleted. Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 11:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

11:51:20, 29 December 2021 review of submission by Avi Sindhu
Avi Sindhu (talk) 11:51, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I have added more citations, if that's what was needed. Please check it.


 * Avi Sindhu, it was not. The draft has ben rejec ted. It will not be considered further. Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 12:07, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

12:03:02, 29 December 2021 review of submission by Youngcryptomax
Hi, I have added in their history, information, partnerships, Notability and References. They are pretty big in the crypto world. I also had a look at other wikipedia pages such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YWN to see which sort of information was needed. Thank you for your time, Max Youngcryptomax (talk) 12:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)


 * @Youngcryptomax regrettably there is nothing that you have added to change the rejection Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 12:05, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for your responce. Do you have any advice of what I should add / change in order to get this approved? thank you very much, Max Youngcryptomax (talk) 13:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * For additional comment, please edit this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. This is easier to do in full desktop mode in a browser, the mobile and app versions do not have full functionality. As noted, once a draft is rejected, it will not be considered further. No amount of editing can confer notability on a topic. You have also chosen to edit in a contentious area, which has its own special rules, I posted information about this on your user talk page. 331dot (talk) 13:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

12:32:36, 29 December 2021 review of submission by Krisperp
Im here requesting why i was declined and if its possible to make it better to be eligible for approval I want to make new wikipedia pages about small content creators that dont get the recognition they deserve
 * Your draft was rejected, not just declined, meaning that it will not be considered further. It is completely unsourced. Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about someone, and topics must already be recognized and received significant coverage in independent reliable sources to merit an article. You cannot create an article to establish recognition. Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 13:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

17:29:57, 29 December 2021 review of submission by Cessnabroon
In what way do you feel is my article contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia? I shall edit my article to ensure that it does. Cessnabroon (talk) 17:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * It is a promotional essay almost exclusively sourced to the company itself. A Wikipedia article summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own, and not prompted by any materials put out by the company, to say about it, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company. If you work for or represent this company, please read WP:COI and WP:PAID for information on formal disclosures you must make. 331dot (talk) 17:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

17:32:20, 29 December 2021 review of draft by TSventon
Hi, I have found a draft on Brindisa submitted by Derekguthrie on 29 October 2021‎ and rejected as not notable by Curb Safe Charmer. Coincidentally, I have recently written an article on a neighbouring business, Monmouth Coffee Company. I have looked for independent references and have found several newspaper articles Also several mentions in a book
 * Financial Times
 * The Independent
 * The Times (partial access)

Are those sufficient to pass AfC notability? If so I will edit the article based on independent sources and resubmit. As I did not start the article I would prefer not to publish it myself.

TSventon (talk) 17:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Apologies again, I replied to you a moment ago on another page, as the author of the original draft submission. As I said there after the article I wrote was rejected I started to look for more authoritative, independent sources to use and have found several, including those you have cited. There are several more which I have access to but are not publicly online. I intend to restart the article and submit an acceptable version soon. The Holidays have interrupted matters! Kind regards DerekguthrieDerekguthrie (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Derekguthrie I am happy to leave the writing to you. However, please can you answer Curb Safe Charmer's question from 29 October about paid editing on your talk page? TSventon (talk) 18:49, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

TSventon Thankyou for your note(s). I will return to this project in the New Year when time allows. I thought I had answered the question about paid editing but will check and do so if it's not clear. DerekguthrieDerekguthrie (talk) 14:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Derekguthrie, I see you said you were "emphatically NOT paid for the submission" on another page, it would be helpful to answer on your talk page as well to make the answer easier to find. Also please could you confirm whether you have any Conflict of interest relating to Brindisa? TSventon (talk) 14:45, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

22:43:30, 29 December 2021 review of submission by Caraghm
I recently submitted a page for https://thinkinvestments.com/ as there was no information available on this company but it was rejected and I'd love to get further clarification as to why?

Thanks, caraghm Caraghm (talk) 22:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Caraghm (talk) 22:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi . Wikipedia doesn't aim to have articles about everything. Its inclusion criteria are set out in notability guidelines. Nothing in the draft suggests that Think Investments should have an encyclopedia article about it. Furthermore, Wikipedia may not be used for any form of publicity, promotion, or public relations. You may find WP:BFAQ informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:31, 30 December 2021 (UTC)